The new vital sign: Where do you live?

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 581-582

  Paskett, Electra D ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD PRESSURE; CANCER RISK; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH DISPARITY; HUMAN; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; NEIGHBORHOOD; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO; VITAL SIGN; GEOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY;

GEOGRAPHY; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS;

EID: 84962345524     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0146     Document Type: Note

References (16)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC health disparities and inequalities report-United States, 2013; 2013. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6203.pdf.
2. Lee JG, Henriksen L, Rose SW, Moreland-Russell S, Ribisl KM. A systematic review of neighborhood disparities in point-of-sale tobacco marketing. Am J Public Health 2015;105:e8-18.
3. Mortel M, Rauscher GH, Murphy AM, Hoskins K, Warnecke RB. Racial and ethnic disparity in symptomatic breast cancer awareness despite a recent screen: the role of tumor biology and mammography facility characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24:1599-606.
4. Barbeau EM, Krieger N, Soobader MJ. Working class matters: socioeco-nomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender, and smoking in NHIS 2000. Am J Public Health 2004;94:269-78.
5. Barbeau EM, Leavy-Sperounis A, Balbach ED. Smoking, social class, and gender: what can public health learn from the tobacco industry about disparities in smoking? Tob Control 2004;13:115-20.
6. Peipins LA, Graham S, Young R, Lewis B, Foster S, Flanagan B, et al. Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area. J Community Health 2011;36:675-83.
7. Dubowitz T, Heron M, Bird CE, Lurie N, Finch BK, Basurto-Davila R, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and fruit and vegetable intake among whites, blacks, and Mexican Americansin the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:1883-91.
8. Merkin SS, Basurto-Davila R, Karlamangla A, Bird CE, Lurie N, Escarce J, et al. Neighborhoods and cumulative biological risk profiles by race/ethnicity in a national sample of U.S. adults: NHANES III. Ann Epidemiol 2009;19:194-201.
9. US Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration. The code of federal regulations of the United States of America; 2007. Available from: https://www.eda.gov/pdf/EDAs-regs-13-CFR-Chapter- III.pdf.
10. Freeman HP, Muth BJ, Kerner JF. Expanding access to cancer screening and clinical follow-up among the medically underserved. Cancer Pract 1995; 3:19-30.
11. Burhansstipanov L, Dignan MB, Schumacher A, Krebs LU, Alfonsi G, Apodaca CC. Breast screening navigator programs within three settings that assist underserved women. J Cancer Educ 2010;25:247-52.
12. Wang X, Fang C, Tan Y, Liu A, Ma GX. Evidence-based intervention to reduce access barriers to cervical cancer screening among under-served Chinese American women. J Womens Health 2010;19:463-9.
13. Battaglia TA, Bak SM, Heeren T, Chen CA, Kalish R, Tringale S, et al. Boston Patient Navigation Research Program: the impact of navigation on time to diagnostic resolution after abnormal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21:1645-54.
14. Hoffman HJ, LaVerda NL, Young HA, Levine PH, Alexander LM, Brem R, et al. Patient navigation significantly reduces delays in breast cancer diagnosis in the District of Columbia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21:1655-63.
15. Luckett R, Pena N, Vitonis A, Bernstein MR, Feldman S. Effect of patient navigator program on no-show rates at an academic referral colposcopy clinic. J Womens Health 2015;24:608-15.
16. Percac-Lima S, Benner CS, Lui R, Aldrich LS, Oo SA, Regan N, et al. The impact of a culturally tailored patient navigator program on cervical cancer prevention in Latina women. J Womens Health 2013;22:426-31.