Mining social media data for opinion polarities about electronic cigarettes

Tobacco Control

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 175-180

  Dai, Hongying ^a,b,c   Hao, Jianqiang ^d  

^a CHILDREN S MERCY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d BELLEVUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; DATA MINING; ECONOMICS; ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PUBLIC OPINION; SMOKING PREVENTION; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VAPING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BAYES THEOREM; DATA MINING; ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PUBLIC OPINION; SMOKING PREVENTION; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; VAPING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84962272211     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052818     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. E-cigarette use triples among middle and high school students in just one year, 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2015/p0416-e-cigarette-use.html
2. King BA, Patel R, Nguyen KH, et al. Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among US adults, 2010-2013. Nicotine Tob Res 2015;17:219-27.
3. Cohen J. Voices: Are e-cigs bad for you? I’m not sure. USA Today, 2015. http://wwwusatodaycom/story/opinion/2015/09/29/voices-e-cigs-bad-for-you-not-sure/72811856/
4. Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Cibella F, et al. EffiCiency and Safety of an eLectronic cigAreTte (ECLAT) as tobacco cigarettes substitute: a prospective 12-month randomized control design study. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e66317.
5. Caponnetto P, Russo C, Bruno CM, et al. Electronic cigarette: a possible substitute for cigarette dependence. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2013;79:12-19.
6. McNeill A, Bross LS, Calder R, et al. E-cigarettes: an evidence update. Public Health England, 2015. https://wwwgovuk/government/publications/e-cigarettes-anevidence-update
7. Leventhal AM, Strong DR, Kirkpatrick MG, et al. Association of electronic cigarette use with Initiation of combustible tobacco product smoking in early Adolescence. JAMA 2015;314:700-7.
8. Huang J, Kornfield R, Szczypka G, et al. A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter. Tob Control 2014;23(Suppl 3):iii26-30.
9. Jo CL, Kornfield R, Kim Y, et al. Price-related promotions for tobacco products on Twitter. Tob Control 2015;Published Online First: 30 Jun 2015. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052260
10. Cavazos-Rehg P, Krauss M, Grucza R, et al. Characterizing the followers and tweets of a marijuana-focused Twitter handle. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e157.
11. Cavazos-Rehg PA, Krauss M, Fisher SL, et al. Twitter chatter about marijuana. J Adolesc Health 2015;56:139-45.
12. Krauss MJ, Sowles SJ, Moreno M, et al. Hookah-related twitter chatter: a content analysis. Prev Chronic Dis 2015;12:E121.
13. Murthy D. Twitter: social communication in the Twitter age. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.
14. Young SD, Rivers C, Lewis B. Methods of using real-time social media technologies for detection and remote monitoring of HIV outcomes. Prev Med 2014;63:112-15.
15. Ram S, Zhang W, Williams M, et al. Predicting asthma-related emergency department visits using Big Data. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2015;19:1216-23.
16. Rodriguez D, Carlos HA, Adachi-Mejia AM, et al. Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysis. Tob Control 2013;22:349-55.
17. Peterson NA, Lowe JB, Reid RJ. Tobacco outlet density, cigarette smoking prevalence, and demographics at the county level of analysis. Subst Use Misuse 2005;40:1627-35.
18. Schneider JE, Reid RJ, Peterson NA, et al. Tobacco outlet density and demographics at the tract level of analysis in Iowa: implications for environmentally based prevention initiatives. Prev Sci 2005;6:319-25.
19. Hyland A, Travers MJ, Cummings KM, et al. Tobacco outlet density and demographics in Erie County, New York. Am J Public Health 2003;93:1075-6.
20. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, et al. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012;1248:107-23.
21. Chen X, Vorvoreanu M, Madhavan K. Mining Social media data for understanding students’ learning experiences. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 2014;7:246-59.
22. Salathé M, Khandelwal S. Assessing vaccination sentiments with online social media: implications for infectious disease dynamics and control. PLoS Comput Biol 2011;7:e1002199.
23. Duggan M, Ellison NB, Lampe C, et al. Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/01/PI_SocialMediaUpdate20144.pdf
24. Etter JF, Eissenberg T. Dependence levels in users of electronic cigarettes, nicotine gums and tobacco cigarettes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015;147:68-75.
25. Meier EM, Tackett AP, Miller MB, et al. Which nicotine products are gateways to regular use? First-tried tobacco and current use in college students. Am J Prev Med 2015;48(1 Suppl 1):S86-93.
26. Jensen RP, Luo W, Pankow JF, et al. Hidden formaldehyde in e-cigarette aerosols. N Engl J Med 2015;372:392-4.
27. McRobbie H, Bullen C, Hartmann-Boyce J, et al. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cession and reduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;12:CD010216.
28. Backgrounder on WHO report on regulation of e-cigarettes and similar products. World Health Organization, 2014. http://wwwwhoint/nmh/events/2014/backgrounder-e-cigarettes/en/
29. Künzli N. To e-smoke or not to e-smoke: is that a question? Int J Public Health 2014;59:679-80.
30. Tan AS, Bigman CA, Sanders-Jackson A. Sociodemographic correlates of self-reported exposure to e-cigarette communications and its association with public support for smoke-free and vape-free policies: results from a national survey of US adults. Tob Control 2015;24:574-81.