Governance of Ecosystem Services: Lessons learned for sustainable institutions

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 16, Issue , 2015, Pages 275-281

  Mann, Carsten ^a   Loft, Lasse ^b   Hansjürgens, Bernd ^c  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

^c HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actors; Ecosystem services; Governance; Institutions; Policy process; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962163784     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alberti Adriana, Bertucci Guido Replicating Innovations in Governance: An Overview 2006, United Nations Publication, New York (N.Y.).
2. Ban Natalie C., Mills Morena, Tam Jordan, Hicks Christina C., Klain Sarah, Stoeckl Natalie, Bottrill Madeleine C., Levine Jordan, Pressey Robert L., Satterfield Terre, et al. A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2013, 11(4):194-202.
3. Borrini-Feyerabend Grazia Governance of protected areas-innovation in the air. Policy Matters 2003, 12:92-115.
4. Folke Carl Social-ecological systems and adaptive governance of the commons. Ecol. Res. 2006, 22(1):14-15.
5. Folke Carl, Hahn Thomas, Olsson Per, Norberg Jon Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30(1):441-473.
6. Freeman A.Myrick The ethical basis of the economic view of the environment. People, Penguins and Plastic Trees: Basic Issues in Environmental Ethics 1986, 218-227. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, CA. Donald van der Veer, C. Pierce (Eds.).
7. Galaz Victor, Olsson Per, Hahn Thomas, Folke Carl, Svedin Uno The problem of fit among biophysical systems, environmental and resource regimes, and broader governance systems: insights and emerging challenges. Institutions and Environmental Change 2008, 147-186. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA. O.R. Young, L.A. King, H. Schroeder (Eds.).
8. Hauck J., Görg C., Varjopuro R., Ratamäki O., Jax K. Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 25:13-21. 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.001.
9. Jax K., Barton D.N., Chan K.M.A., de Groot R., Doyle U., Eser U., Görg C., Gómez-Baggethun E., Griewald Y., Haber W., Haines-Young R., Heink U., Jahn T., Joosten H., Kerschbaumer L., Korn H., Luck G.W., Matzdorf B., Muraca B., Neßhöver C., Norton B., Ott K., Potschin M., Rauschmayer F., von Haaren C., Wichmann S. Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 93:260-268.
10. Lebel Louis, Anderies John M., Campell B., Carl Folke S., Hatfield-Dodds T.P., Hughes, Wilson James Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11(1). [www document]. URL. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=sms_facpub.
11. Leslie, Heather, M., Xavier Basurto, Mateja Nenadovic, Leila Sievanen, Kyle C. Cavanaugh, Juan Jose Cota-Nieto, Brad E. Erisman, Elena Finkbeiner, Gustavo Hinojosa-Arango et al. 2015. Operationalizing the socio-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States. [www document]. URL http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/04/23/1414640112.full.pdf.
12. Matzdorf B., Meyer C. The relevance of the ecosystem services framework for developed countries' environmental policies: a comparative case study of the US and EU. Land Use Policy 2014, 38:509-521. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.011.
13. Max-Neef Manfred A. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 53(1):5-16.
14. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment 2003, Island Press, Washington (DC).
15. Muradian, Roldan, Laura, Rival, 2013. Ecosystem Services and Environmental Governance: Some Concluding Remarks. In: Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services, Springer, 465-71.
16. Ostrom Elinor Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud. J. 2011, 39(1):7-27.
17. Ostrom Elinor A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 2009, 325(5929):419-422.
18. Ostrom Elinor, Basurto Xavier Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. J. Inst. Econ. 2011, 7(3):317-343.
19. Potschin M.B., Haines-Young R.H. Ecosystem services. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2011, 35(5):575-594.
20. Rival Laura, Muradian Roldan Introduction: governing the provision of ecosystem services. Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services 2013, 1-17. Springer, Heidelberg, New York, London. Roland Muradian, L. Rival (Eds.).
21. Spash Clive L. Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 34(2):195-215.
22. Star L.S. This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2010, 35:601-617. 10.1177/0162243910377624.
23. Wilkinson C., Saarne T., Peterson G.D., Colding J. Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept-an historical exploration. Ecol. Soc. 2013, 18(1). 10.5751/ES-05368-180137.
24. Yin R., Liu S., Yao S., Zhao M. Designing and implementing payments for ecosystem services programs: lessons learned from China's cropland restoration experience. For. Policy Econ. 2013, 35:66-72.
25. Young Oran R. Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2010, 20(3):378-385.
26. Young Oran R. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge.