Evaluation of nine somatic variant callers for detection of somatic mutations in exome and targeted deep sequencing data

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Krøigård, Anne Bruun ^a,b   Thomassen, Mads ^a,b   Lænkholm, Anne Vibeke ^c   Kruse, Torben A ^a,b   Larsen, Martin Jakob ^a,b  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c SLAGELSE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXOME SEQUENCING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INDEL MUTATION; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE VARIANT; SOMATIC MUTATION; TARGETED DEEP SEQUENCING; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; EVALUATION STUDY; EXOME; FEMALE; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MUTATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; BASE SEQUENCE; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EXOME; FEMALE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MUTATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84962159505     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151664     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kim SY, Jacob L, Speed TP. Combining calls from multiple somatic mutation-callers. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014; 15: 154. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-154 PMID: 24885750.
2. Pabinger S, Dander A, Fischer M, Snajder R, Sperk M, Efremova M, et al. A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data. BriefBioinform. 2013; doi:10.1093/bib/bbs086.
3. Roberts ND, Kortschak RD, Parker WT, Schreiber AW, Branford S, Scott HS, et al. A comparative analysis of algorithms for somatic SNV detection in cancer. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 2223-2230. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt375PMID: 23842810.
4. Stead LF, Sutton KM, Taylor GR, Quirke P, Rabbitts P. Accurately Identifying Low-Allelic Fraction Variants in Single Samples with Next-Generation Sequencing: Applications in Tumor Subclone Resolution. HumMutat. 2013; doi:10.1002/humu.22365.
5. Wang Q, Jia P, Li F, Chen H, Ji H, Hucks D, et al. Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: A comparison of mutation callers. Genome Med. 2013; 5: 91. doi:10.1186/gm495 PMID: 24112718.
6. Xu H, DiCarlo J, Satya RV, Peng Q, Wang Y. Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data. BMC Genomics. 2014; 15: 244doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-244 PMID: 24678773.
7. Wang Q, Zhao Z. A comparative study of methods for detecting small somatic variants in disease-normal paired next-generation sequencing data. Int Workshop Genomic Signal Process Stat GENSIPS. December 2-4, 2012.
8. Cibulskis K, Lawrence MS, Carter SL, Sivachenko A, Jaffe D, Sougnez C, et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. NatBiotechnol. 2013; 31: 213- 219. doi:10.1038/nbt.2514.
9. Nakamura K, Oshima T, Morimoto T, Ikeda S, Yoshikawa H, Shiwa Y, et al. Sequence-specific error profile of Illumina sequencers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39: e90. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr344PMID: 21576222.
10. Nielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A, Song YS. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. NatRevGenet. 2011; 12: 443-451. doi:10.1038/nrg2986.
11. Saunders CT, Wong WSW, Swamy S, Becq J, Murray LJ, Cheetham RK. Strelka: Accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28: 1811- 1817doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts271 PMID: 22581179.
12. Shiraishi Y, Sato Y, Chiba K, Okuno Y, Nagata Y, Yoshida K, et al. An empirical Bayesian framework for somatic mutation detection from cancer genome sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41: e89. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt126 PMID: 23471004.
13. Larson DE, Harris CC, Chen K, Koboldt DC, Abbott TE, Dooling DJ, et al. SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28: 311-317. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr665 PMID: 22155872.
14. Christoforides A, Carpten JD, Weiss GJ, Demeure MJ, Von Hoff DD, Craig DW. Identification of somatic mutations in cancer through Bayesian-based analysis of sequenced genome pairs. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14: 302. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-302 PMID: 23642077.
15. Kim S, Jeong K, Bhutani K, Lee JH, Patel A, Scott E, et al. Virmid: Accurate detection of somatic mutations with sample impurity inference. Genome Biol. 2013; 14: R90doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-8-r90 PMID: 23987214.
16. Hansen NF, Gartner JJ, Mei L, Samuels Y, Mullikin JC. Shimmer: detection of genetic alterations in tumors using next-generation sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29: 1498-1503. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt183PMID: 23620360.
17. Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, et al. VarScan 2: Somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012; 22: 568-576. doi:10.1101/gr.129684.111 PMID: 22300766.
18. Griffith M, Miller CA, Griffith OL, Krysiak K, Skidmore ZL, Ramu A, et al. Optimizing cancer genome sequencing and analysis. Cell Syst. 2015; 1: 210-223. doi:10.1016/j.cels.2015.08.015PMID: 26645048.
19. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin RE, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011; 43: 491-498. doi:10.1038/ng.806 PMID: 21478889.
20. Rashid M, Robles-Espinoza CD, Rust AG, Adams DJ. Cake: A bioinformatics pipeline for the integrated analysis of somatic variants in cancer genomes. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2013; 29: 2208-2210. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt371.
21. Krøigård AB, Larsen MJ, Lænkholm A-V, Knoop AS, Jensen JD, Bak M, et al. Clonal expansion and linear genome evolution through breast cancer progression from pre-invasive stages to asynchronous metastasis. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 5634-5649. PMID: 25730902.