Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1125-1131

  Polanec, Stephan ^a   Helbich, Thomas H ^a   Bickel, Hubert ^a   Pinker Domenig, Katja ^a   Georg, Dietmar ^a   Shariat, Shahrokh F ^a   Aulitzky, Wolfgang ^b   Susani, Martin ^a   Baltzer, Pascal A ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b Medical University Vienna ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

Multiparametric MRI; PI RADS; Prostate cancer; Standardized reporting

Indexed keywords

GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KAPPA STATISTICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM VERSION 1; PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM VERSION 2; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEM; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; BIOPSY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84962142323     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. L. Dickinson, H.U. Ahmed, C. Allen, and et al. Scoring systems used for the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization: could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging within the diagnostic pathway? J. Magn. Reson. Imaging JMRI 37 2013 48 58
2. J.O. Barentsz, J. Richenberg, R. Clements, and et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 Eur. Radiol. 22 2012 746 757
3. M.C. Roethke, T.H. Kuru, S. Schultze, and et al. Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla Eur. Radiol. 24 2014 344 352
4. A.B. Rosenkrantz, S. Kim, R.P. Lim, and et al. Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales Radiology 269 2013 482 492
5. D. Junker, M. Quentin, U. Nagele, and et al. Evaluation of the PI-RADS scoring system for mpMRI of the prostate: a whole-mount step-section analysis World J. Urol. 33 2015 1023 1030
6. L. Kayat Bittencourt, G. Litjens, C.A. Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, and et al. Prostate cancer: The European Society of Urogenital Radiology Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Criteria for Predicting Extraprostatic Extension by Using 3-T Multiparametric MR Imaging Radiology 276 2015 479 489
7. L. Schimmöller, M. Quentin, C. Arsov, and et al. Predictive power of the ESUR scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis verified with targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy Eur. J. Radiol. 83 2014 2103 2108
8. PIRADS V2. 'http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/PIRADS/PIRADS%20V2.pdf/' (accessed 22.03.16).
9. J.J. Fütterer, S.W.T.P.J. Heijmink, T.W.J. Scheenen, and et al. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging-early experience Radiology 238 2006 184 191
10. C.M.A. Hoeks, J.O. Barentsz, T. Hambrock, and et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging Radiology 261 2011 46 66
11. D.M. Somford, T. Hambrock, C.A. Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, and et al. Initial experience with identifying high-grade prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in patients with a Gleason score ≤ 3 + 3 = 6 upon schematic TRUS-guided biopsy: a radical prostatectomy correlated series Invest. Radiol. 47 2012 153 158
12. B.N. Bloch, E. Furman-Haran, T.H. Helbich, and et al. Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging-initial results Radiology 245 2007 176 185
13. S.H. Polanec, T.H. Helbich, M. Margreiter, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: institutional analysis and systematic review RöFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb. Röntgenstrahlen Nukl. 186 2014 501 507
14. J.J. Fütterer, S. Verma, T. Hambrock, and et al. High-risk prostate cancer: value of multi-modality 3T MRI-guided biopsies after previous negative biopsies Abdom. Imaging 37 2012 892 896
15. T. Hambrock, D.M. Somford, C. Hoeks, and et al. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen J. Urol. 183 2010 520 527
16. C.M.A. Hoeks, M.G. Schouten, J.G.R. Bomers, and et al. Three-tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers Eur. Urol. 62 2012 902 909
17. J.I. Epstein, W.C. Allsbrook, M.B. Amin, and et al. ISUP Grading Committee, The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 29 2005 1228 1242
18. M. Röthke, D. Blondin, H.-P. Schlemmer, and et al. PI-RADS classification: structured reporting for MRI of the prostate RöFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb. Röntgenstrahlen Nukl. 185 2013 253 261
19. L. Schimmöller, M. Quentin, C. Arsov, and et al. MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy Eur. Radiol. 24 2014 2582 2589
20. A.D.J. Baur, A. Maxeiner, T. Franiel, and et al. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate Invest. Radiol. 49 2014 411 420
21. S.H. Polanec, K. Pinker-Domenig, P. Brader, and et al. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate at 3 T: limited value of 3D (1)H-MR spectroscopy as a fourth parameter World J. Urol. 2015
22. N. Schieda, J.S. Quon, C. Lim, and et al. Evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) PI-RADS scoring system for assessment of extra-prostatic extension in prostatic carcinoma Eur. J. Radiol. 84 2015 1843 1848
23. H.A. Vargas, A.M. Hötker, D.A. Goldman, and et al. Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference Eur. Radiol. 2015
24. M. Kasel-Seibert, T. Lehmann, R. Aschenbach, and et al. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the detection of prostate cancer Eur. J. Radiol. 85 2016 726 731
25. T. Franiel, C. Stephan, A. Erbersdobler, and et al. Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding-multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning Radiology 259 2011 162 172
26. D. Yakar, T. Hambrock, C. Hoeks, and et al. Magnetic resonance-guided biopsy of the prostate: feasibility, technique, and clinical applications Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging TMRI 19 2008 291 295
27. D. Beyersdorff, A. Winkel, B. Hamm, and et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results Radiology 234 2005 576 581
28. M. Roethke, A.G. Anastasiadis, M. Lichy, and et al. MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy World J. Urol. 30 2012 213 218