Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting improves shortterm outcomes compared with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 459-468

  Gong, Wenhui ^a   Cai, Junfeng ^a   Wang, Zhe ^a   Chen, Anqing ^a   Ye, Xiaofeng ^a   Li, Haiqing ^a   Zhao, Qiang ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Coronary surgery; Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB); Robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (robotically assisted CABG); Survival

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE DIRECT CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; MORTALITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; THORACOTOMY; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84962140610     PISSN: 20721439     EISSN: 20776624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.02.67     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Srivastava SP, Patel KN, Skantharaja R, et al. Offpump complete revascularization through a left lateral thoracotomy (ThoraCAB): the first 200 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:46-9.
2. Gulielmos V, Eller M, Thiele S, et al. Influence of median sternotomy on the psychosomatic outcome in coronary artery single-vessel bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16 Suppl 2:S34-8.
3. Dullum MK, Block J, Qazi A, et al. Xyphoid MIDCAB: report of the technique and experience with a less invasive MIDCAB procedure. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2:77-81.
4. Magee MJ, Mack MJ. Robotics and coronary artery surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 2002;17:602-7.
5. Rogers CA, Pike K, Angelini GD, et al. An open randomized controlled trial of median sternotomy versus anterolateral left thoracotomy on morbidity and health care resource use in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: the Sternotomy Versus Thoracotomy (STET) trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:306-16.e1-9.
6. Srivastava S, Gadasalli S, Agusala M, et al. Use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries in CABG through lateral thoracotomy with robotic assistance in 150 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:800-6; discussion 806.
7. Katz MR, Van Praet F, de Canniere D, et al. Integrated coronary revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention plus robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. Circulation 2006;114:I473-6.
8. Reser D, Hemelrijck MV, Pavicevic J, et al. Mid-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;63:313-8.
9. Diegeler A, Thiele H, Falk V, et al. Comparison of stenting with minimally invasive bypass surgery for stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2002;347:561-6.
10. Takemura H. Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass. Circ J 2014;78:313-4.
11. Liu TJ, Shih MS, Lee WL, et al. Hypoxemia during onelung ventilation for robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:127-32.
12. Longmire WP Jr, Cannon JA, Kattus AA. Direct-vision coronary endarterectomy for angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 1958;259:993-9.
13. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:4-34.
14. Cooley DA. Con: beating-heart surgery for coronary revascularization: is it the most important development since the introduction of the heart-lung machine? Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1779-81.
15. Polomsky M, Puskas JD. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting-the current state. Circ J 2012;76:784-90.
16. Takagi H, Watanabe T, Mizuno Y, et al. A meta-analysis of large randomized trials for mid-term major cardioand cerebrovascular events following off-pump versus onpump coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2014;18:522-4.
17. Lapierre H, Chan V, Sohmer B, et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting via a small thoracotomy versus off-pump: a case-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:804-10.
18. Wang S, Zhou J, Cai JF. Traditional coronary artery bypass graft versus totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft or robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft-meta-analysis of 16 studies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2014;18:790-7.
19. Ishikawa N, Watanabe G, Tomita S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. ThoraCAB. Circ J 2014;78:399-402.
20. Angelini GD, Wilde P, Salerno TA, et al. Integrated left small thoracotomy and angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery revascularisation. Lancet 1996;347:757-8.
21. Green KD, Lynch DR Jr, Chen TP, et al. Combining PCI and CABG: the role of hybrid revascularization. Curr Cardiol Rep 2013;15:351.
22. Borst C, Gründeman PF. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: an experimental perspective. Circulation 1999;99:1400-3.
23. Cho DS, Linte C, Chen EC, et al. Predicting target vessel location on robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft using CT to ultrasound registration. Med Phys 2012;39:1579-87.
24. Escoto A, Trejos AL, Patel RV, et al. Anatomy-based eligibility measure for robotic-assisted bypass surgery. Innovations (Phila) 2014;9:349-53; discussion 353.