The development of gaze following as a Bayesian systems identification problem

Proceedings - 2nd International Conference on Development and Learning, ICDL 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 34-40

  Movellan, J R ^a   Watson, J S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS;

AVERAGE AGES; HUMAN BEING; HUMANOID ROBOT; OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS; OPERATIONAL PROPERTIES; PERCEPTUAL DIMENSIONS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SYSTEMS IDENTIFICATION;

ROBOTS;

EID: 84962006691     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/DEVLRN.2002.1011728     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Tenenbaum J. B. Rules and similarity in concept learning. In S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen, and K. R. Muller, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, number 12, pages 59-65. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
2. G. O. Deak, I. R. Fasel, and J. R. Movellan. The emergence of shared attention: using robots to test developmental theories. In Balkenius, editor, Proceedings of the first international workshop on epigenetic robotics: modeling cognitive development, pages 95-104. Lund University Cognitive Studies, Lund, Sweden, 2001.
3. Bigelow A. E. Infant's sensitivity to imperfect contingency in social interaction. In P. Rochat, editor, Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life, pages 241-256. LEA, New York, 1999.
4. Courchesne E., Saitoh O., Yeung-Courchesne R., Press G.A., Lincoln A.J., Haas R.H., and Schreibman L. Abnormality of cerebellar vermian lobules vi and vii in patients with infantile autism: Identification of hypoplastic and hyperplastic subgroups by mr imaging. American Journal of Roentgenology, 162:123-130, 1994.
5. I. Fasel, G. O. Deak, J. Triesch, and J. R. Movellan. Combining embodied models and empirical research for understanding the development of shared attention. In Proceedings of the second international conference on development and learning (ICDL02). MIT, 2002.
6. Povinelli D. J. and Eddy T. J. Chimpanzees: Joint visual attention. Psychological Science, 7:129-135, 1996.
7. Povinelli D. J. and Eddy T. J. Specificity of gaze-following in young chimpanzees. British Journal of De- velopmental Psychology, 15:213-222, 1997.
8. Stevens J. Outliers and influential data points in regression analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95(2):233-344, 1984.
9. Scaife M. and Bruner J. S. The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature, 253:265-266, 1975.
10. C. Moore. Gaze following and the control of attention. In P. Rochat, editor, Early social cognition: understanding others in the first months of life, pages 241-256. LEA, New York, 1999.
11. J. R. Movellan and J. Nelson. Probabilistic functionalism: A unifying paradigm for the cognitive sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, In Press.
12. O. Nelles. Nonlinear System Identification : From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models. Springer, 2001.
13. J. D. Nelson and J. R. Movellan. Active inference in concept induction. In T. Leen, T. G. Dietterich, and V. Tresp, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, number 13, pages 45-51. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001.
14. J. D. Nelson, J. B. Tenenbaum, and J. R. Movellan. Active inference in concept learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 381-384. LEA, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2001.
15. M. Oaksford and N. Chater. Rational models of cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
16. Bahrick L. R. and Watson J. S. Detection of intermodal proprioceptive-visual contingency as a potential basis of self-perception in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 21:963-973, 1985.
17. Movellan J. R. and J. S. Watson. Perception of directional attention. In Infant Behavior and Development: Abstracts of the 6th International Conference on Infant Studies, NJ, 1987. Ablex.
18. Baron-Cohen S., Leslie A.M., and Frith U. Does the autistic have a "theory of mind"? Cognition, 21:37-46, 1985.
19. Johnson S., Slaughter V., and Carey S. Whose gaze will infants follow? the elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1:233-238, 1998.
20. Leekam S., S. Baron-Cohen, Perret D., Milders M., and Brown S. Eye direction detection: a dissociation between geometric and joint attention skills in autism. British journal of developmental psychology, 15:77-95, 1977.
21. B. Scasselatti. Building behaviors developmentally:a new formalism. Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Integrating Robotics Research, 1998.
22. B. Scasselatti. How robotics and developmental psychology complement each other. NSF/DARPA Workshop on Development and Learning, 2000.
23. Corkum V. and Moore C. The origins of joint visual attention in infants. Developmental Psychology, 34:28-38, 1998.
24. J. S. Watson. Smiling, cooing and "the game". Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 18:323-339, 1972.
25. J. S. Watson. The perception of contingency as a determinant of social responsiveness. In E. B. Thoman, editor, Origins of the Infant's Social Responsiveness, pages 33-64. LEA, New York, 1979.
26. J. S. Watson. Contingency perception in earlyh social development. In Field T. M. and Fox N. A., editors, Social perception in infants, pages 157-176. Ables, New Jersey, 1985.