Bayesian analysis of factorial designs

Psychological Methods

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 304-321

  Rouder, Jeffrey N ^a   Morey, Richard D ^b   Verhagen, Josine ^c   Swagman, April R ^a   Wagenmakers, Eric Jan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Bayes factors; Bayesian analysis; Model selection

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BAYES THEOREM; FACTORIAL DESIGN; HUMAN; MODEL; PSYCINFO; SCIENTIST; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84961919420     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/met0000057     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bayarri, M. J., & Garcia-Donato, G. (2007). Extending conventional priors for testing general hypotheses in linear models. Biometrika, 94, 135-152.
2. Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 407-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ a0021524
3. Berger, J. O. (2006). The case for objective Bayesian analysis. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 385-402.
4. Berger, J. O., & Berry, D. A. (1988). Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. American Scientist, 76, 159-165.
5. Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. (1987). Testing a point null hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of p values and evidence. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 112-122. Retrieved from http://www.jstor .org/stable/2289131
6. Box, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1973). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. New York, NY: Addison-Weseley.
7. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
8. Cornfield, J., & Tukey, J. W. (1956). Average values of mean squares in factorials. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 4, 907-949.
9. Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29.
10. DeGroot, M. H. (1982). Lindley's paradox: Comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 336-339. Retrieved from http:// www.jstor.org/stable/2287246
11. Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 145-147.
12. Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg .2014.00781
13. Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 70, 193-242.
14. Efron, B. (2005). Bayesians, frequentists, and scientists. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 1-5.
15. Efron, B., & Morris, C. (1977). Stein's paradox in statistics. Scientific American, 236, 119-127.
16. Falmagne, J. C. (1990). Elements of psychophysical theory. New York, NY: Oxford.
17. Gallistel, C. R. (2009). The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review, 116, 439-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015251
18. Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43-74.
19. Gelman, A. (2005). Analysis of variance-Why it is more important than ever. Annals of Statistics, 33, 1-53.
20. Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2013). Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 57-64.
21. Gelman, A., Shor, B., Bafumi, J., & Park, D. (2007). Rich state, poor state, red state, blue state: What's the matter with Connecticut? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 345-367.
22. Goldstein, M. (2006). Subjective Bayesian analysis: Principles and practice. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 403-420.
23. James, W., & Stein, C. (1961). Estimation with quadratic loss. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 361-379). Retrieved from https://projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.bsmsp/1200512173
24. Jaynes, E. (2003). Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795.
27. Kruschke, J. K. (2011). Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparison. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 299-312.
28. Kruschke, J. K. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 573-603.
29. Liang, F., Paulo, R., Molina, G., Clyde, M. A., & Berger, J. O. (2008). Mixtures of g-priors for Bayesian variable selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 410-423. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1198/016214507000001337
30. Liu, C. C., & Aitkin, M. (2008). Bayes factors: Prior sensitivity and model generalizability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 362-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.03.002
31. Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834. Retrieved from http://www. psych.umn.edu/faculty/meehlp/113TheoreticalRisks.pdf
32. Morey, R. D., Romeijn, J.-W., & Rouder, J. N. (2013). The humble Bayesian: Model checking from a fully Bayesian perspective. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 68-75. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02067.x
33. Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2011). Bayes factor approaches for testing interval null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 16, 406-419. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024377
34. Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2014). BayesFactor 0.9.6. Comprehensive R Archive Network. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/ packages/BayesFactor/index.html
35. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J.(2014). Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: A comment on Cumming. Psychological Science, 24, 1291-1292.
36. Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014). Simple relation between Bayesian order-restricted and point-null hypothesis tests. Statistics & Probability Letters, 92, 121-124. Retrieved from http://www.science direct.com/science/article/pii/S0167715214001862
37. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
38. Nelder, J. A. (1998). The selection of terms in response-surface modelshow strong is the weak-heredity principle? American Statistician, 52, 315-318.
39. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-163.
40. Rouder, J. N., Lu, J., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., & Jiang, Y. (2005). A Hierarchical Model for Estimating Response Time Distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 195-223.
41. Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2011). A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem's ESP claim. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 682-689. http:// dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0088-7
42. Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2012). Default Bayes factors for model selection in regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 877- 903.
43. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 356 -374.
44. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 225-237. http://dx.doi.org/10 .3758/PBR.16.2.225
45. Stein, C. (1959). An example of wide discrepancy between fiducial and confidence intervals. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30, 877- 880. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2237432
46. The JASP Team. (2016). JASP (Version 0.7.5.5) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://jasp-stats.org
47. Venables, W. N. (2000, October). Exegeses on linear models. Exegeses on linear models. Paper presented to the S-PLUS User's Conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS3/ Exegeses.pdf
48. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problem of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 779-804.
49. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of Psi. A comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022790
50. Zellner, A., & Siow, A. (1980). Posterior odds ratios for selected regression hypotheses. In J. M. Bernardo, M. H. DeGroot, D. V. Lindley, & A. F. M. Smith (Eds.), Bayesian statistics: Proceedings of the first international meeting held in Valencia (pp. 585-603). Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia.