Utilization of the Robotic Surgical Platform for Radical Nephrectomy: A National Comparison of Trends for Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches

Urology Practice

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 187-194

  Weinberg, Aaron C ^a   Whalen, Michael J ^b   Paulucci, David J ^b   Woldu, Solomon ^a   Deibert, Christopher M ^c   Korets, Ruslan ^d   Badani, Ketan K ^b  

^a New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Kidney neoplasms; Medical overuse; Nephrectomy; Practice patterns, physicians'; Robotics

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KIDNEY CANCER; LACERATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 84961904379     PISSN: 23520779     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2015.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Siegel R., Ma J., Zou Z., et al. Cancer statistics, 2014. Cancer J Clin 2014, 64:9.
2. Tan H.J., Wolf J.S., Ye Z., et al. Population-level comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for patients with kidney cancer. Cancer 2011, 117:4184.
3. Jeon S.H., Kwon T.G., Rha K.H., et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a retrospective analysis of multi-center results. BJU Int 2011, 107:817.
4. Dogra P.N., Abrol N., Singh P., et al. Outcomes following robotic radical nephrectomy: a single-center experience. Urol Int 2012, 89:78.
5. Rogers C., Laungani R., Krane L.S., et al. Robotic nephrectomy for the treatment of benign and malignant disease. BJU Int 2008, 102:1660.
6. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project: Overview of the National (Nationwide) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Available at . Accessed May 4, 2015. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp.
7. Yu H.Y., Hevelone N.D., Lipsitz S.R., et al. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 2012, 187:1392.
8. Nazemi T., Galich A., Sterrett S., et al. Radical nephrectomy performed by open, laparoscopy with or without hand-assistance or robotic methods by the same surgeon produces comparable perioperative results. Int Braz J Urol 2006, 32:15.
9. Hemal A.K., Kumar A. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 2009, 27:89.
10. Boger M., Lucas S.M., Popp S.C., et al. Comparison of robot-assisted nephrectomy with laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. JSLS 2010, 14:374.
11. Asimakopoulos A.D., Miano R., Annino F., et al. Robotic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review. BMC Urol 2014, 14:75.
12. Merseburger A.S., Herrmann T.R., Shariat S.F., et al. EAU guidelines on robotic and single-site surgery in urology. Eur Urol 2013, 64:277.
13. Anderson J.E., Chang D.C., Parsons J.K., et al. The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 2012, 215:107.
14. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987, 40:373.
15. Deyo R.A., Cherkin D.C., Ciol M.A. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidem 1992, 45:613.
16. Hu J.C., Gu X., Lipsitz S.R., et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009, 302:1557.
17. Allareddy V., Allareddy V., Konety B.R. Specificity of procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association. Ann Surg 2007, 246:135.
18. Pappas T.N., Jacobs D.O. Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer-the end of the beginning?. N Engl J Med 2004, 350:2091.
19. Barbash G.I., Glied S.A. New technology and health care costs-the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:701.
20. Bolenz C., Gupta A., Hotze T., et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2010, 57:453.
21. Mir S.A., Cadeddu J.A., Sleeper J.P., et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2011, 25:447.
22. Poon S.A., Silberstein J.L., Chen L.Y., et al. Trends in partial and radical nephrectomy: an analysis of case logs from certifying urologists. J Urol 2013, 190:464.
23. Novick A.C., Campbell S.C., Belldegrun A., et al. Guideline for Management of the Clinical Stage 1 Renal Mass 2009, American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum.
24. Klingler D.W., Hemstreet G.P., Balaji K.C. Feasibility of robotic radical nephrectomy-initial results of single-institution pilot study. Urol 2005, 65:1086.
25. Gettman M.T., Blute M.L., Chow G.K., et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 2004, 64:914.
26. Sun Y., de Castro Abreu A.L., Gill I.S. Robotic inferior vena cava thrombus surgery: novel strategies. Curr Opin Urol 2014, 24:140.
27. Hemal A.K., Kumar A., Kumar R., et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 2007, 177:862.
28. Permpongkosol S., Chan D.Y., Link R.E., et al. Long-term survival analysis after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2005, 174:1222.
29. Meeks J.J., Eastham J.A. Robotic prostatectomy: the rise of the machines or judgment day. Eur Urol 2012, 61:686.
30. Trinh Q.D., Sammon J., Sun M., et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012, 61:679.