Robotic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review

BMC Urology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D ^a,d   Miano, Roberto ^b   Annino, Filippo ^c,d   Micali, Salvatore ^e   Spera, Enrico ^a   Iorio, Beniamino ^a   Vespasiani, Giuseppe ^b   Gaston, Richard ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b TOR VERGATA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN DONATO   (Italy)

^d CLINIQUE SAINT AUGUSTIN   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Radical nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Robot assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy; Robotic nephrectomy; Robotic radical nephrectomy

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL CLIP; CANCER SURGERY; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; LENGTH OF STAY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; ROBOTIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS; STAPLER; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; ECONOMICS; HOSPITAL COST; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84907580723     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-75     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/kidrp.html
2. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Patard JJ, Mulders PF, Sinescu IC, Eur Urol 2010 58 3 398 406 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.032 20633979
3. Feasibility of robotic radical nephrectomy-initial results of single-institution pilot study. Klingler DW, Hemstreet GP, Balaji KC, Urology 2005 65 6 1086 1089 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.020 15913733
4. Robotic remote laparoscopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: the initial experience. Gill IS, Sung GT, Hsu TH, Meraney AM, J Urol 2000 164 6 2082 2085 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66973-X 11061931
5. Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. Guillonneau B, Jayet C, Tewari A, Vallancien G, J Urol 2001 166 1 200 201 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66111-3 11435858
6. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. Horgan S, Vanuno D, J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001 11 415 419 10.1089/10926420152761950 11814134
7. Early experience with robotically assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Horgan S, Vanuno D, Benedetti E, Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002 12 1 64 70 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00011 12008766
8. http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025
9. Robotic nephrectomy for the treatment of benign and malignant disease. Rogers C, Laungani R, Krane LS, Bhandari A, Bhandari M, Menon M, BJU Int 2008 102 1660 1665 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07895.x 18671787
10. Outcomes following robotic radical nephrectomy: a single-center experience. Dogra PN, Abrol N, Singh P, Gupta NP, Urol Int 2012 89 78 82 10.1159/000336627 22538353
11. Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the Fourth Arm and TilePro. Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, Krane LS, Eun D, Patel MN, Boris R, Shrivastava A, Menon M, J Endourol 2009 23 115 121 10.1089/end.2008.0416 19178173
12. Initial series of robotic radical nephrectomy with vena caval tumor thrombectomy. Abaza R, Eur Urol 2011 59 4 652 656 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.038 20846783
13. Robotics applied in laparoscopic kidney surgery: the Yonsei University experience of 127 cases. Lorenzo EI, Jeong W, Oh CK, Chung BH, Choi YD, Rha KH, Urology 2011 77 1 114 118 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.011 20434761
14. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: surgical technique and comparative outcomes. White MA, Autorino R, Spana G, Laydner H, Hillyer SP, Khanna R, Yang B, Altunrende F, Isac W, Stein RJ, Haber GP, Kaouk JH, Eur Urol 2011 59 5 815 822 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.020 21334805
15. Radical nephrectomy performed by open, laparoscopy with or without hand-assistance or robotic methods by the same surgeon produces comparable perioperative results. Nazemi T, Galich A, Sterrett S, Klingler D, Smith L, Balaji KC, Int Braz J Urol 2006 32 15 22 10.1590/S1677-55382006000100003 16519823
16. Comparison of robot-assisted nephrectomy with laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. Boger M, Lucas SM, Popp SC, Gardner TA, Sundaram CP, JSLS 2010 14 374 380 10.4293/108680810X12924466007124 21333191
17. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. Hemal AK, Kumar A, World J Urol 2009 27 89 94 10.1007/s00345-008-0321-9 18704439
18. Tumor seeding incidentally found two years after robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy for papillary renal cell carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Ploumidis A, Panoskaltsis T, Gavresea T, Yiannou P, Yiannakou N, Pavlakis K, Int J Surg Case Rep 2013 4 6 561 564 10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.03.031 23632074
19. Does robotic assistance confer an economic benefit during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy? Yamg DY, Monn MF, Bahler CD, Sundaram CP, J Urol 2014 doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.018. [Epub ahead of print]
20. EAU guidelines on robotic and single-site surgery in urology. Merseburger AS, Herrmann TR, Shariat SF, Kyriazis I, Nagele U, Traxer O, Liatsikos EN, Eur Urol 2013 64 2 277 291 doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.034 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.034 23764016
21. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma with infrahepatic vena caval thrombus. Disanto V, Pansadoro V, Portoghese F, Scalese GA, Romano M, Eur Urol 2005 47 3 352 356 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.11.010 15716200
22. Laparoscopic-assisted nephrectomy with inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy: preliminary results. Varkarakis IM, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Inagaki T, Gonzalgo ML, Jarrett TW, Urology 2004 64 5 925 929 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.044 15533479
23. Outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in the setting of vena caval and renal vein thrombus: seven-year experience. Martin GL, Castle EP, Martin AD, Desai PJ, Lallas CD, Ferrigni RG, Andrews PE, J Endourol 2008 22 8 1681 1685 10.1089/end.2008.0035 18657033
24. Hand assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena caval thrombus. Sundaram CP, Rehman J, Landman J, Oh J, J Urol 2002 168 1 176 179 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64855-0 12050516
25. Pure laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with level II vena caval thrombectomy. Romero FR, Muntener M, Bagga HS, Brito FA, Sulman A, Jarrett TW, Urology 2006 68 5 1112 1114 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1084 17095065
26. Robotic radical nephrectomy with vena caval tumor thrombectomy: experience of novice robotic surgeons. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Korean J Urol 2012 53 12 879 882 10.4111/kju.2012.53.12.879 23301135
27. Trends in renal surgery: robotic technology is associated with increased use of partial nephrectomy. Patel HD, Mullins JK, Pierorazio PM, Jayram G, Cohen JE, Matlaga BR, Allaf ME, J Urol 2013 189 4 1229 1235 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.024 23085300
28. Partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥ 7 cm: technical, oncological and functional outcomes. Long CJ, Canter DJ, Kutikov A, Li T, Simhan J, Smaldone M, Teper E, Viterbo R, Boorjian SA, Chen DY, Greenberg RE, Uzzo RG, BJU Int 2012 109 10 1450 1456 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10608.x 22221502
29. Argument in favor of performing partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 7: the metastatic prescription has already been written. Bratslavsky G, Urol Oncol 2011 29 6 829 832 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.05.010 22078407