Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy Using the C-MAC for Tracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department, a Randomized Controlled Trial

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 433-439

  Driver, Brian E ^a   Prekker, Matthew E ^a   Moore, Johanna C ^a   Schick, Alexandra L ^a   Reardon, Robert F ^a   Miner, James R ^a  

^a HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ASPIRATION PNEUMONIA; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGOSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE; ADULT; AGED; DEVICES; HOSPITAL EMERGENCY SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADULT; AGED; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84961836208     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: 15532712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/acem.12933     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Brown CA, Bair AE, Pallin DJ, Walls RM,; NEAR III Investigators. Techniques, success, and adverse events of emergency department adult intubations. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 65: 363-70.e1.
2. Silverberg MJ, Li N, Acquah SO, Kory PD,. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2015; 43: 636-41.
3. Sakles JC, Mosier J, Chiu S, Cosentino M, Kalin L,. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60: 739-48.
4. De Jong A, Molinari N, Pouzeratte Y, et al., Difficult intubation in obese patients: incidence, risk factors, and complications in the operating theatre and in intensive care units. Br J Anaesth 2014; 40: 629-39.
5. Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Borgers A, Groeben H,. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 546-50.
6. Sakles JC, Patanwala AE, Mosier JM, Dicken JM,. Comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of patients with difficult airway characteristics in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med 2013; 9: 93-8.
7. Vassiliadis J, Tzannes A, Hitos K, Brimble J, Fogg T,. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas 2015; 27: 119-25.
8. Cavus E, Thee C, Moeller T, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V, Wagner K,. A randomised, controlled crossover comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy in 150 patients during routine induction of anaesthesia. BMC Anesth 2011; 11: 6.
9. Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM,. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 629-36.
10. Sakles JC, Mosier JM, Patanwala AE, Dicken JM, Kalin L, Javedani PP,. The C-MAC video laryngoscope is superior to the direct laryngoscope for the rescue of failed first-attempt intubations in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2015; 48: 280-6.
11. Brown CA III, Pallin DJ, Walls RM,. Video laryngoscopy and intubation safety. Crit Care Med 2015; 43: 717-8.
12. ® vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 1126-32.
13. Gupta N, Rath GP, Prabhakar H,. Clinical evaluation of C-MAC videolaryngoscope with or without use of stylet for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization. J Anesth 2013; 27: 663-70.
14. Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U,. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 71-8.
15. Thibodeau LG, Verdile VP, Bartfield JM,. Incidence of aspiration after urgent intubation. Am J Emerg Med 1997; 15: 562-5.
16. Miner JR, Moore JC, Nelson RS, Patel R, Reardon RF,. The association of the occurrence of aspiration pneumonia with the intubating device used, the number of attempts, the time to intubation, and the occurrence of hypoxia during the intubation among patients intubated in the emergency department. Abstracts of the 2012 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Annual Meeting, Abstract 429. May 9-12, 2012, Chicago, IL.
17. Levitan RM,. Video laryngoscopy, regardless of blade shape, still requires a backup plan. Ann Emerg Med 2013; 61: 421-2.
18. Ufberg JW, Bushra JS, Karras DJ, Satz WA, Kueppers F,. Aspiration of gastric contents: association with prehospital intubation. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23: 379-82.
19. Butler J, Sen A,. Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 1: Cricoid pressure in emergency rapid sequence induction. Emerg Med J 2013; 30: 163-5.