Variations in state use of antitobacco message themes predict youth smoking prevalence in the USA, 1999–2005

Tobacco Control

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 101-107

  Niederdeppe, Jeff ^a   Avery, Rosemary ^a   Byrne, Sahara ^a   Siam, Tyseer ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; LEAST SQUARE ANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; SMOKING; TIME FACTOR; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; SMOKING; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84961742762     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051836     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Preventing tobacco use among youth and adults: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2012. http: //www. surgeongeneral. gov/ library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report. pdf (accessed 1 May 2014).
2. Farrelly MC, Loomis BR, Han B, et al. A comprehensive examination of the influence of state tobacco control programs and policies on youth smoking. Am J Public Health 2013; 103: 549-55.
3. Levy ET, Chaloupka F, Gitchell J. The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. J Public Health Manag Pract 2004; 10: 338-53.
4. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Reducing Tobacco Use: Strategies, Barriers, and Consequences. Ending the tobacco problem: a blueprint for the nation. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2007.
5. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. NIH publication no. 07---6242, June 2008. http: //cancercontrol. cancer. gov/tcrb/monographs/19/ monograph19. html (accessed 1 May 2014).
6. Wakefield MA, Loken B, Hornik RC. Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour. Lancet 2010; 376: 1261-71.
7. Wakefield M, Terry-McElrath Y, Emery S, et al. Effect of televised, tobacco-company-funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions, and behavior. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 2154-60.
8. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, et al. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "TRUTH" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 425-31.
9. Pechmann C, Reibling ET. Antismoking advertisements for youths: an independent evaluation of health, counter-industry, and industry approaches. Am J Public Health 2006; 95: 906-13.
10. Biener L, Ji M, Gilpin EA, et al. The impact of emotional tone, message, and broadcast parameters in youth anti-smoking advertisements. J Health Commun 2004; 9: 259-74.
11. Wakefield M, Durrant R, Terry-McElrath Y, et al. Appraisal of anti-smoking advertising by youth at risk for regular smoking: a comparative study in the United States, Australia, and Britain. Tob Control 2003; 12(Suppl 2): ii82-6.
12. Terry-McElrath Y, Wakefield M, Ruel E, et al. The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement. J Health Commun 2005; 10: 127-43.
13. Lee S, Cappella JN, Lerman C, et al. Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs. Nicotine Tob Res 2011; 13: 282-90.
14. Wang AL, Ruparel K, Loughead JW, et al. Content matters: neuroimaging investigation of brain and behavioral impact of televised anti-tobacco public service announcements. J Neurosci 2013; 33: 7420-7.
15. Niederdeppe J, Davis KC, Farrelly MC, et al. Stylistic features, need for sensation, and confirmed recall of national smoking prevention advertisements. J Commun 2007; 57: 272-92.
16. Cohen EL, Shumate MD, Gold A. Anti-smoking media campaign messages: theory and practice. Health Commun 2007; 22: 91-102.
17. Rhodes N, Roskos-Ewoldsen D, Eno CA, et al. The content of cigarette counter-advertising: are perceived functions of smoking addressed? J Health Commun 2009; 14: 658-73.
18. NHSDA, SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health. http: //www. samhsa. gov/data/NSDUH. aspx (accessed 1 May 2014).
19. ImpacTEEN, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Health Behavior, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences. http: //www. impacteen. org/tobacco. htm (accessed 1 May 2014).
20. Alciati MH, Frosh M, Green SB, et al. State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system. Tob Control 1998; 7: 345-52.
21. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, et al. Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 901-7.
22. Henriksen L, Dauphinee AL, Wang Y, et al. Industry sponsored anti-smoking ads and adolescent reactance: test of a boomerang effect. Tob Control 2006; 15: 13-18.
23. Byrne S, Hart PS. The "boomerang effect": a synthesis of findings and preliminary theoretical framework. Commun Yearbook 2009; 33: 3-37.
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs: 2014. Atlanta, GA: CDC/Office on Smoking and Health, 2014.