Effects of correlated parameters and uncertainty in electronic-structure-based chemical kinetic modelling

Nature Chemistry

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 331-337

  Sutton, Jonathan E ^a   Guo, Wei ^a,b   Katsoulakis, Markos A ^c   Vlachos, Dionisios G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961590846     PISSN: 17554330     EISSN: 17554349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2454     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bligaard, T. et al. Electronic-structure-based design of ordered alloys. MRS Bull. 31, 986-990 (2006).
2. Greeley, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Bonde, J., Chorkendorff, I. B. & Nørskov, J. K. Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution. Nature Mater. 5, 909-913 (2006).
3. Greeley, J. & Mavrikakis, M. Alloy catalysts designed from first principles. Nature Mater. 3, 810-815 (2004).
4. Greeley, J. & Norskov, J. Combinatorial density functional theory-based screening of surface alloys for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 4932-4939 (2009).
5. Norskov, J., Bligaard, T., Rossmeisl, J. & Christensen, C. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nature Chem. 1, 37-46 (2009).
6. Hansgen, D. A., Vlachos, D. G. & Chen, J. G. Using first principles to predict bimetallic catalysts for the ammonia decomposition reaction. Nature Chem. 2, 484-489 (2010).
7. Norskov, J. K., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F. & Bligaard, T. Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 937-943 (2011).
8. Wellendorff, J. et al. Density functionals for surface science: exchangecorrelation model development with Bayesian error estimation. Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012).
9. Klimes, J. & Michaelides, A. Perspective: advances and challenges in treating van der Waals dispersion forces in density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 120901 (2012).
10. Medford, A. J. et al. Assessing the reliability of calculated catalytic ammonia synthesis rates. Science 345, 197-200 (2014).
11. Salciccioli, M., Stamatakis, M., Caratzoulas, S. & Vlachos, D. G. A review of multiscale modeling of metal-catalyzed reactions: mechanism development for complexity and emergent behavior. Chem. Eng. Sci. 66, 4319-4355 (2011).
12. Campbell, C. T. Finding the rate-determining step in a mechanism: comparing DeDonder relations with the 'degree of rate control'. J. Catal. 204, 520-524 (2001).
13. Stegelmann, C., Andreasen, A. & Campbell, C. T. Degree of rate control: how much the energies of intermediates and transition states control rates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 8077-8082 (2009).
14. Norskov, J., Bligaard, T. & Kleis, J. Rate control and reaction engineering. Science 324, 1655-1656 (2009).
15. Sutton, J. E., Panagiotopoulou, P., Verykios, X. E. & Vlachos, D. G. Combined DFT, microkinetic, and experimental study of ethanol steam reforming on Pt. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 4691-4706 (2013).
16. Sutton, J. E. & Vlachos, D. G. Building large microkinetic models with firstprinciples' accuracy at reduced computational cost. Chem. Eng. Sci. 121, 190-199 (2015).
17. Gokhale, A. A., Kandoi, S., Greeley, J. P., Mavrikakis, M. & Dumesic, J. A. Molecular-level descriptions of surface chemistry in kinetic models using density functional theory. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59, 4679-4691 (2004).
18. Phatak, A. A. et al. Kinetics of the water-gas shift reaction on Pt catalysts supported on alumina and ceria. Catal. Today 123, 224-234 (2007).
19. 2) metal oxide carriers. Catal. Today 127, 319-329 (2007).
20. Calle-Vallejo, F., Loffreda, D., Koper Marc, T. M. & Sautet, P. Introducing structural sensitivity into adsorption-energy scaling relations by means of coordination numbers. Nature Chem. 7, 403-410 (2015).
21. Nørskov, J. K. et al. Universality in heterogeneous catalysis. J. Catal. 209, 275-278 (2002).
22. Christensen, C. H. & Nørskov, J. K. A molecular view of heterogeneous catalysis. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 182503 (2008).
23. 3 catalysts. Catal. Today 258, 247-255 (2015).
24. Panagiotopoulou, P. & Verykios, X. E. Mechanistic aspects of the low temperature steam reforming of ethanol over supported Pt catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 16333-16345 (2012).
25. Sexton, B. A., Rendulic, K. D. & Hughes, A. E. Decomposition pathways of C1-C4 alcohols adsorbed on platinum (111). Surf. Sci. 121, 181-198 (1982).
26. Skoplyak, O., Barteau, M. A. & Chen, J. G. Ethanol and ethylene glycol on Ni/Pt (111) bimetallic surfaces: a DFT and HREELS study. Surf. Sci. 602, 3578-3587 (2008).
27. Alcala, R., Mavrikakis, M. & Dumesic, J. DFT studies for cleavage of C-C and C-O bonds in surface species derived from ethanol on Pt(111). J. Catal. 218, 178-190 (2003).
28. Alcala, R., Shabaker, J., Huber, G., Sanchez-Castillo, M. & Dumesic, J. Experimental and DFT studies of the conversion of ethanol and acetic acid on PtSn-based catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 2074-2085 (2005).
29. Wang, H. & Liu, Z. Comprehensive mechanism and structure-sensitivity of ethanol oxidation on platinum: new transition-state searching method for resolving the complex reaction network. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10996-11004 (2008).
30. Wang, J.-H., Lee, C. S. & Lin, M. C. Mechanism of ethanol reforming: theoretical foundations. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 6681-6688 (2009).
31. Guo, W. & Vlachos, D. G. On factors controlling activity of submonolayer bimetallic catalysts: nitrogen desorption. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 014703 (2014).
32. Stamatakis, M., Chen, Y. & Vlachos, D. G. First-principles-based kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of the structure sensitivity of the water-gas shift reaction on platinum surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 24750-24762 (2011).
33. 2 activation on Ru(0001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1814-1817 (1999).
34. Bahn, S. R. & Jacobsen, K. W. An object-oriented scripting interface to a legacy electronic structure code. Comp. Sci. Eng. 4, 56-66 (2002).
35. Mortensen, J. J., Hansen, L. B. & Jacobsen, K.W. Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 035109 (2005).
36. Enkovaara, J. et al. Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: a real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method. J. Phys.-Cond. Matter 22, 253202 (2010).
37. Larsen, A. H., Vanin, M., Mortensen, J. J., Thygesen, K. S. & Jacobsen, K. W. Localized atomic basis set in the projector augmented wave method. Phys. Rev. B 80, 195112 (2009).
38. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865-3868 (1996).
39. Kucherenko, S., Rodriguez-Fernandez, M., Pantelides, C. & Shah, N. Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 94, 1135-1148 (2009).