Factors influencing the surgical decision for the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis in a preference-based shared decision-making process

Paleontological Journal

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 339-347

  Kim, Ho Joong ^a   Park, Jae Young ^a   Kang, Kyoung Tak ^b   Chang, Bong Soon ^a   Lee, Choon Ki ^a   Yeom, Jin S ^a  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; Preference based decision making; Shared decision making; Surgical decision

Indexed keywords

AGED; BACKACHE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; SPINAL STENOSIS;

AGED; BACK PAIN; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; SPINAL STENOSIS;

EID: 84961348821     PISSN: 00310301     EISSN: 15556174     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3441-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Katz JN (2001) Patient preferences and health disparities. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 286(12):1506–1509
2. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, Wilkins A, Badley EM (2001) Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients’ preferences. Med Care 39(3):206–216
3. Bederman SS, Coyte PC, Kreder HJ, Mahomed NN, McIsaac WJ, Wright JG (2011) Who’s in the driver’s seat? The influence of patient and physician enthusiasm on regional variation in degenerative lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 36(6):481–489. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d25e6f
4. Ridd M, Shaw A, Lewis G, Salisbury C (2009) The patient doctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients’ perspectives. Br J Gen Pract 59(561):e116–e133. doi:10.3399/bjgp09X420248
5. Kaplan R (1999) Shared medical decision-making: a new paradigm for behavioral medicine—1997 presidential address. Ann Behav Med 21(1):3–11. doi:10.1007/BF02895027
6. Weinstein JN (2000) The missing piece: embracing shared decision making to reform health care. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 25(1):1–4
7. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Weinstein J, Howe J, Ciol M, Mulley AG (2000) Involving patients in clinical decisions: impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery. Med Care 38(9):959–969
8. Kurd M, Lurie J, Zhao W, Tosteson T, Hilibrand A, Rihn J, Albert T, Weinstein J (2012) Predictors of treatment choice in lumbar spinal stenosis: a spine patient outcomes research trial study. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 37(19):1702–1707
9. Watters WC 3rd, Baisden J, Gilbert TJ, Kreiner S, Resnick DK, Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Heggeness MH, Mazanec DJ, O’Neill C, Reitman CA, Shaffer WO, Summers JT, Toton JF, North American Spine S (2008) Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 8(2):305–310. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.033
10. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 25(22):2940–2952
11. Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, Boston
12. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H (2008) Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358(8):794–810
13. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson A, Blood E, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H (2010) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis 4-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(14):1329–1338. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d
14. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2000) Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 25(5):556–562
15. Atlas S, Keller R, Wu Y, Deyo R, Singer D (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 30(8):936–943
16. Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, Tansey R, Wardlaw D, Smith FW, Kulik G (2010) Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 35(21):1919–1924
17. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner K, Fisher ES (2006) United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine (Philadelphia, Pa 1976) 31(23):2707–2714
18. Jacobs JJ, Andersson GBJ, Bell JE et al (2008) The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States: prevalence, societal and economic cost. American Academy Orthopedic Surgeons Rosemont. http://www.boneandjointburden.org
19. Strömqvist F, Ahmad M, Hildingsson C, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B (2008) Gender differences in lumbar disc herniation surgery. Acta Orthop 79(5):643–649
20. Brattberg G, Parker MG, Thorslund M (1997) A longitudinal study of pain: reported pain from middle age to old age. Clin J Pain 13(2):144–149
21. Lavsky Shulan M, Wallace RB, Kohout FJ, Lemke JH, Morris MC, Smith IM (1985) Prevalence and functional correlates of low back pain in the elderly: the Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 33(1):23–28
22. Fillingim RB, King CD, Ribeiro Dasilva MC, Rahim Williams B, Riley JL (2009) Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J Pain 10(5):447–485
23. Racine M, Tousignant Laflamme Y, Kloda LA, Dion D, Dupuis G, Choinière M (2012) A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and pain perception—part 2: do biopsychosocial factors alter pain sensitivity differently in women and men? Pain 153(3):619–635
24. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN (1997) Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med 102(6):524–530
25. Schizas C, Kulik G (2012) Decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis: a survey on the influence of the morphology of the dural sac. J Bone Jt Surg Br 94(1):98–101
26. Kim HJ, Suh BG, Lee DB, Lee GW, Kim DW, Kang KT, Chang BS, Lee CK, Yeom JS (2013) The influence of pain sensitivity on the symptom severity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Pain Physician 16:135–144