Survival strategies of the plant-associated bacterium Enterobacter sp. strain EG16 under cadmium stress

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1734-1744

  Chen, Yanmei ^a   Chao, Yuanqing ^a   Li, Yaying ^a   Lin, Qingqi ^a   Bai, Jun ^a   Tang, Lu ^a   Wang, Shizhong ^a   Ying, Rongrong ^b   Qiu, Rongliang ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANJING INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOREMEDIATION; CADMIUM; CADMIUM SULFIDE; SOIL POLLUTION; SULFUR; BACTERIA; CADMIUM METALLOGRAPHY; II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

ASSISTED PHYTOREMEDIATION; ENERGY DISPERSIVE X-RAY; INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID; INTRACELLULAR GLUTATHIONE LEVELS; PLANT GROWTH PROMOTION; PLANT-ASSOCIATED BACTERIA; SIDEROPHORE PRODUCTION; STRESS-RELATED PROTEINS; METAL POLLUTED SOILS;

BACTERIA; CADMIUM SULFIDE;

BACTERIUM; CADMIUM; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GROWTH REGULATOR; HORMONE; HOST-SYMBIONT INTERACTION; METABOLISM; PLANT; SIDEROPHORE; SOIL POLLUTION; SURVIVAL;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ENTEROBACTER SP.;

CADMIUM; INDOLEACETIC ACID; INDOLEACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PHYTOHORMONE; SIDEROPHORE;

CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFECTS; ENTEROBACTER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY;

CADMIUM; ENTEROBACTER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS; SIDEROPHORES; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84961262253     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03689-15     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Maynaud G, Brunel B, Mornico D, Durot M, Severac D, Dubois E, Navarro E, Cleyet-Marel J-C, Le Quéré A. 2013. Genome-wide transcriptional responses of two metal-tolerant symbiotic Mesorhizobium isolates to zinc and cadmium exposure.BMCGenomics 14:292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-292
2. Holmes JD, Smith PR, Evans-Gowing R, Richardson DJ, Russell DA, Sodeau JR. 1995. Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis of the extracellular cadmium sulfide crystallites of Klebsiella aerogenes. Arch Microbiol 163: 143-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00381789
3. Belimov AA, Hontzeas N, Safronova VI, Demchinskaya SV, Piluzza G, Bullitta S, Glick BR. 2005. Cadmium-tolerant plant growthpromoting bacteria associated with the roots of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern.). Soil Biol Biochem 37:241-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.033
4. Stohs S, Bagchi D. 1995. Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic Biol Med 18:321-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-H
5. Mitra RS, Bernstein IA. 1978. Single-strand breakage in DNA of Escherichia coli exposed to Cd2+. J Bacteriol 133:75-80
6. Jin YH, Clark AB, Slebos RJ, Al-Refai H, Taylor JA, Kunkel TA, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA. 2003. Cadmium is a mutagen that acts by inhibiting mismatch repair. Nat Genet 34:326-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1172
7. Mitra RS. 1984. Protein synthesis in Escherichia coli during recovery from exposure to low levels of Cd2+. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:1012-1016
8. Turgay O, Bilen S. 2012. The role of plant growth-promoting rhizosphere bacteria in toxic metal extraction by Brassica spp., p 213-237. In Anjum NA, Ahmad I, Pereira ME, Duarte AC, Umar S, Khan NA (ed), Environmental pollution, vol 21. The plant family Brassicaceae: contribution towards phytoremediation. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands
9. Patten CL, Glick BR. 2002. Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3795-3801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.8.3795-3801.2002
10. Glick BR. 2005. Modulation of plant ethylene levels by the bacterial enzymeACCdeaminase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 251:1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.07.030
11. Rajkumar M, Ae N, Prasad MNV, Freitas H. 2010. Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction. Trends Biotechnol 28:142-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.002
12. Dourado MN, Martins PF, Quecine MC, Piotto FA, Souza LA, Franco MR, Tezotto T, Azevedo RA. 2013. Burkholderia sp. SCMS54 reduces cadmium toxicity and promotes growth in tomato. Ann Appl Biol 163: 494-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aab.12066
13. Habibi S, Djedidi S, Prongjunthuek K, Mortuza MF, Ohkama-Ohtsu N, Sekimoto H, Yokoyoma T. 2014. Physiological and genetic characterization of rice nitrogen fixer PGPR isolated from rhizosphere soils of different crops. Plant Soil 379:51-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2035-7
14. Prapagdee B, Chanprasert M, Mongkolsuk S. 2013. Bioaugmentation with cadmium-resistant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to assist cadmium phytoextraction by Helianthus annuus. Chemosphere 92:659-666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.082
15. Ma Y, Prasad MNV, Rajkumar M, Freitas H. 2011. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnol Adv 29:248-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.12.001
16. Khonsue N, Kittisuwan K, Kumsopa A, Tawinteung N, Prapagdee B. 2013. Inoculation of soil with cadmium-resistant bacteria enhances cadmium phytoextraction by Vetiveria nemoralis and Ocimum gratissimum. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1696-9
17. Sessitsch A, Kuffner M, Kidd P, Vangronsveld J, Wenzel WW, Fallmann K, Puschenreiter M. 2013. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 60:182-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.012
18. Rajkumar M, Sandhya S, Prasad MNV, Freitas H. 2012. Perspectives of plant-associated microbes in heavy metal phytoremediation. Biotechnol Adv 30:1562-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.04.011
19. Kamnev AA, Tugarova AV, Antonyuk LP, Tarantilis PA, Polissiou MG, Gardiner PHE. 2005. Effects of heavy metals on plant-associated rhizobacteria: comparison of endophytic and non-endophytic strains of Azospirillum brasilense. J Trace Elem Med Biol 19:91-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2005.03.002
20. Sinha S, Mukherjee SK. 2008. Cadmium-induced siderophore production by a high Cd-resistant bacterial strain relieved Cd toxicity in plants through root colonization. Curr Microbiol 56:55-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-007-9038-z
21. Schalk IJ, Hannauer M, Braud A. 2011. New roles for bacterial siderophores in metal transport and tolerance. Environ Microbiol 13:2844-2854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02556.x
22. Dimkpa CO, Zeng J, McLean JE, Britt DW, Zhan J, Anderson AJ. 2012. Production of indole-3-acetic acid via the indole-3-acetamide pathway in the plant-beneficial bacterium Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 is inhibited by ZnO nanoparticles but enhanced by CuO nanoparticles. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:1404-1410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07424-11
23. Dimkpa CO, Merten D, Svatoš A, Büchel G, Kothe E. 2009. Siderophores mediate reduced and increased uptake of cadmium by Streptomyces tendae F4 and sunflower (Helianthus annuus), respectively. J Appl Microbiol 107:1687-1696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04355.x
24. Ma Z, Jacobsen FE, Giedroc DP. 2009. Coordination chemistry of bacterial metal transport and sensing. Chem Rev 109:4644-4681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr900077w
25. Nies DH. 2003. Efflux-mediated heavy metal resistance in prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:313-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00048-2
26. Nies DH. 1999. Microbial heavy-metal resistance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:730-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002530051457
27. Monsieurs P, Moors H, Van Houdt R, Janssen PJ, Janssen A, Coninx I, Mergeay M, Leys N. 2011. Heavy metal resistance in Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34 is governed by an intricate transcriptional network. Biometals 24:1133-1151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-011-9473-y
28. Srinath T, Verma T, Ramteke P, Garg S. 2002. Chromium(VI) biosorption and bioaccumulation by chromate resistant bacteria. Chemosphere 48:427-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00089-9
29. Gadd GM. 1990. Heavy metal accumulation by bacteria and other microorganisms. Experientia 46:834-840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01935534
30. Fang LC, Zhou C, Cai P, Chen WL, Rong XM, Dai K, Liang W, Gu JD, Huang QY. 2011. Binding characteristics of copper and cadmium by cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis. J Hazard Mater 190:810-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.122
31. Dimkpa C, Svatoš A, Merten D, Büchel G, Kothe E. 2008. Hydroxamate siderophores produced by Streptomyces acidiscabies E13 bind nickel and promote growth in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) under nickel stress. Can J Microbiol 54:163-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/W07-130
32. Alexander D, Zuberer D. 1991. Use of chrome azurol S reagents to evaluate siderophore production by rhizosphere bacteria. Biol Fertil Soils 12:39-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00369386
33. Li Y, Yue Q, Gao B. 2010. Adsorption kinetics and desorption of Cu(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution onto humic acid. J Hazard Mater 178: 455-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.103
34. Jin YH, Dunlap PE, McBride SJ, Al-Refai H, Bushel PR, Freedman JH. 2008. Global transcriptome and deletome profiles of yeast exposed to transition metals. PLoS Genet 4:e1000053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000053
35. Gómez-Sagasti MT, Becerril JM, Martin I, Epelde L, Garbisu C. 2014. cDNA microarray assessment of early gene expression profiles in Escherichia coli cells exposed to a mixture of heavy metals. Cell Biol Toxicol 30:207-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10565-014-9281-6
36. Wang HW, Chung CH, Ma TY, Wong HC. 2013. Roles of alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit C (AhpC) in viable but nonculturable Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3734-3743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00560-13
37. Wasim M, Bible AN, Xie Z, Alexandre G. 2009. Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase has a role in oxidative stress resistance and in modulating changes in cell-surface properties in Azospirillum brasilense Sp245. Microbiology 155:1192-1202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.022541-0
38. Hantke K. 2001. Iron and metal regulation in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 4:172-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00184-3
39. Wang A, Crowley DE. 2005. Global gene expression responses to cadmium toxicity in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 187:3259-3266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.9.3259-3266.2005
40. Chang DE, Smalley DJ, Conway T. 2002. Gene expression profiling of Escherichia coli growth transitions: an expanded stringent response model. Mol Microbiol 45:289-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03001.x
41. Wysocki R, Tamás MJ. 2010. How Saccharomyces cerevisiae copes with toxic metals and metalloids. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:925-951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00217.x
42. Scott C, Hilton ME, Coppin CW, Russell RJ, Oakeshott JG, Sutherland TD. 2007. A global response to sulfur starvation in Pseudomonas putida and its relationship to the expression of low-sulfur-content proteins. FEMS Microbiol Lett 267:184-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00575.x
43. Grant CM. 2001. Role of the glutathione/glutaredoxin and thioredoxin systems in yeast growth and response to stress conditions. Mol Microbiol 39:533-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02283.x
44. Helbig K, Grosse C, Nies DH. 2008. Cadmium toxicity in glutathione mutants of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 190:5439-5454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00272-08
45. Fauchon M, Lagniel G, Aude JC, Lombardia L, Soularue P, Petat C, Marguerie G, Sentenac A, Werner M, Labarre J. 2002. Sulfur sparing in the yeast proteome in response to sulfur demand. Mol Cell 9:713-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00500-2
46. Thorsen M, Lagniel G, Kristiansson E, Junot C, Nerman O, Labarre J, Tamas MJ. 2007. Quantitative transcriptome, proteome, and sulfur metabolite profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to arsenite. Physiol Genomics 30:35-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00236.2006
47. Waldron KJ, Robinson NJ. 2009. How do bacterial cells ensure that metalloproteins get the correct metal? Nat Rev Microbiol 7:25-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2057
48. Fontecave M. 2006. Iron-sulfur clusters: ever-expanding roles. Nat Chem Biol 2:171-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchembio0406-171
49. Huyer M, Page WJ. 1988. Zn increases siderophore production in Azotobacter vinelandii. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:2625-2631
50. Baysse C, De Vos D, Naudet Y, Vandermonde A, Ochsner U, Meyer J-M, Budzikiewicz H, Schäfer M, Fuchs R, Cornelis P. 2000. Vanadium interferes with siderophore-mediated iron uptake in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 146:2425-2434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00221287-146-10-2425
51. Dimkpa CO. 2009. Microbial siderophores in rhizophere interactions in heavy metal containing environments. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Jena, Jena, Germany
52. Dimkpa CO, Merten D, Svatoš A, Büchel G, Kothe E. 2009. Metalinduced oxidative stress impacting plant growth in contaminated soil is alleviated by microbial siderophores. Soil Biol Biochem 41:154-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.010
53. Ma L, Payne SM. 2012. AhpC is required for optimal production of enterobactin by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 194:6748-6757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.01574-12
54. Braud A, Hoegy F, Jezequel K, Lebeau T, Schalk IJ. 2009. New insights into the metal specificity of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyoverdine-iron uptake pathway. Environ Microbiol 11:1079-1091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01838.x
55. Naik MM, Dubey SK. 2011. Lead-enhanced siderophore production and alteration in cell morphology in a Pb-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain 4EA. Curr Microbiol 62:409-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9722-2
56. Gaonkar T, Bhosle S. 2013. Effect of metals on a siderophore producing bacterial isolate and its implications on microbial assisted bioremediation of metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 93:1835-1843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.036
57. Glickmann E, Dessaux Y. 1995. A critical examination of the specificity of the Salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:793-796
58. Patten CL, Blakney AJC, Coulson TJD. 2013. Activity, distribution and function of indole-3-acetic acid biosynthetic pathways in bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 39:395-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2012.716819
59. Dimkpa CO, Svatos A, Dabrowska P, Schmidt A, Boland W, Kothe E. 2008. Involvement of siderophores in the reduction of metal-induced inhibition of auxin synthesis in Streptomyces spp. Chemosphere 74:19-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.079
60. Potters G, Pasternak TP, Guisez Y, Palme KJ, Jansen MAK. 2007. Stress-induced morphogenic responses: growing out of trouble? Trends Plant Sci 12:98-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.01.004
61. Remans T, Thijs S, Truyens S, Weyens N, Schellingen K, Keunen E, Gielen H, Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J. 2012. Understanding the development of roots exposed to contaminants and the potential of plantassociated bacteria for optimization of growth. Ann Bot 110:239-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs105
62. Tripathi M, Munot HP, Shouche Y, Meyer JM, Goel R. 2005. Isolation and functional characterization of siderophore-producing lead-and cadmium-resistant Pseudomonas putida KNP9. Curr Microbiol 50:233-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-004-4459-4
63. Farina R, Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, de Camposa SB, Lisboa BB, Wendisch V, Vargas LK, Passaglia LMP. 2012. Diversity of plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria communities associated with the stages of canola growth. Appl Soil Ecol 55:44-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.12.011
64. Kuklinsky-Sobral J, Araujo WL, Mendes R, Geraldi IO, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, Azevedo JL. 2004. Isolation and characterization of soybeanassociated bacteria and their potential for plant growth promotion. Environ Microbiol 6:1244-1251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00658.x
65. Qiu Z, Tan H, Zhou S, Cao L. 2014. Enhanced phytoremediation of toxic metals by inoculating endophytic Enterobacter sp. CBSB1 expressing bifunctional glutathione synthase. J Hazard Mater 267:17-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.043
66. Zakria M, Ohsako A, Saeki Y, Yamamoto A, Akao S. 2008. Colonization and growth promotion characteristics of Enterobacter sp. and Herbaspirillum sp. on Brassica oleracea. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 54:507-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2008.00265.x
67. Abbas SZ, Rafatullah M, Ismail N, Lalung J. 2014. Isolation, identification, characterization, and evaluation of cadmium removal capacity of Enterobacter species. J Basic Microbiol 54:1279-1287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201400157
68. Banerjee G, Pandey S, Ray AK, Kumar R. 2015. Bioremediation of heavy metals by a novel bacterial strain Enterobacter cloacae and its antioxidant enzyme activity, flocculant production, and protein expression in presence of lead, cadmium, and nickel. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2359-9
69. Chien C-C, Huang C-H, Lin Y-W. 2013. Characterization of a heavy metal translocating P-type ATPase gene from an environmental heavy metal resistance Enterobacter sp. isolate. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169: 1837-1846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-0047-4
70. El-Deeb B, Gherbawy Y, Hassan S. 2012. Molecular characterization of endophytic bacteria from metal hyperaccumulator aquatic plant (Eichhornia crassipes) and its role in heavy metal removal. Geomicrobiol J 29:906-915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2011.635764
71. Sinha A, Kumar S, Khare SK. 2013. Biochemical basis of mercury remediation and bioaccumulation by Enterobacter sp. EMB21. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169:256-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-9970-7
72. Holmes A, Vinayak A, Benton C, Esbenshade A, Heinselman C, Frankland D, Kulkarni S, Kurtanich A, Caguiat J. 2009. Comparison of two multimetal resistant bacterial strains: Enterobacter sp. YSU and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ORO2. Curr Microbiol 59:526-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9471-2