Sustainable drainage systems: Helping people live with water

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Water Management

Volumn 169, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 94-104

  Everett, Glyn ^a   Lamond, Jessica ^a   Morzillo, Anita T ^b   Chan, Faith Ka Shun ^c   Matsler, Annie Marissa ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM NINGBO CHINA   (China)

^d PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Education training; Floods floodworks; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DRAINAGE; DROUGHT; FLOODS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BEHAVIOUR CHANGES; COMMUNITY RESILIENCES; POTENTIAL SHIFT; SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DRAINAGE NETWORK; DROUGHT; FLOODING; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER MANAGEMENT;

UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84961250311     PISSN: 17417589     EISSN: 17517729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/wama.14.00076     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Achleitner S, Engelhard C, Stegner U and Rauch W (2007) Local infiltration devices at parking sites – experimental assessment of temporal changes in hydraulic and contaminant removal capacity. Water Science and Technology 55(4): 193–200.
2. Apostolaki S and Jefferies C (2005) Social Impacts of Stormwater Management Techniques Including River Management and SUDS. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK, Final report SUDS01.
3. Barr S, Gilg A and Shaw G (2011) Citizens, consumers and sustainability: re(framing) environmental practice in an age of climate change. Global Environmental Change 21(4): 1224–1233.
4. Bastien NRP, Arthur S and McLoughlin MJ (2011) Valuing amenity: public perceptions of sustainable drainage systems ponds. Water and Environment Journal 26(1): 19–29.
5. BES (2005) Portland Watershed Management Plan: Annual Report. Bureau of Environmental Services, Portland, USA.
6. BES (2007) Green Streets Resolution. Bureau of Environmental Services, Portland, OR, USA. See https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/article/154232(accessed 20 May 2014).
7. BES (2014) City of Portland 2014 Stormwater Management Manual. Bureau of Environmental Services, Portland, USA.
8. Bryant A and Charmaz K (2010) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. Sage, London, UK.
9. Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H and Minami C (2001) Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management. Water Environment Research 73(1): 5–14.
10. Defra (2005) Making Space for Water: Taking Forward a New Government Strategy for Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management in England. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK.
11. Dingman SL (2008) Physical Hydrology. Waveland Press, Illinois, USA.
12. EPA (2007) Reducing Stormwater Costs Through Low Impact Development (Lid) Strategies and Practices. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., USA.
13. EPA (2013) Stormwater to Street Trees: Engineering Urban Forests for Stormwater Management. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA.
14. Getter KL, Rowe DB and Andresen JA (2007) Quantifying the effect of slope on extensive green roof stormwater retention. Ecological Engineering 31(4): 225–231.
15. Glaser BG and Strauss AL (2009) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Transaction Publishers, London, UK.
16. Hargreaves T (2010) Putting Foucault to Work on the Environment: Exploring Pro-environmental Behaviour Change as a Form of Discipline. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, CSERGE working paper, EDM, No. 10–11.
17. Heal KV (2000) SUDS ponds in Scotland – performance outcomes to date. In Twentieth Meeting of the Standing Conference on Stormwater Source Control, 19 September 2000 (Pratt CJ (ed.)). School of the Built Environment, Covtd University, Coventry, UK.
18. Heal KV, Bray R, Willingale SAJ et al. (2008) Medium-term performance and maintenance of SUDS: a case study of Hopwood Park Motorway Service Area, UK. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
19. Johnson CL and Priest SJ (2008) Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility. International Journal of Water Resources Development 24(4): 513–525.
20. Jones P and Macdonald N (2007) Making space for unruly water: sustainable drainage systems and the disciplining of surface runoff. Geoforum 38(3): 534–544.
21. Kenyon W (2007) Evaluating flood risk management options in Scotland: A participant-led multi-criteria approach. Ecological Economics 64(1): 70–81.
22. Kurtz T (2010) Ecoroof performance monitoring in Portland, Oregon. Proceedings of International Low Impact Development Conference – Redefining Water in the City. American Society of Civil Engineers, San Francisco CA, USA.
23. Land and Water Constructions (2006) Review of Street Scale WSUD in Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Kingston City Council, Melbourne, Australia.
24. McKissock G, Jefferies C and D’Arcy BJ (1999) An assessment of drainage best management practices in Scotland. Water and Environment Journal 13(1): 47–51.
25. Mitchell G (2005) Mapping hazard from urban non-point pollution: a screening model to support sustainable urban drainage planning. Journal of Environmental Management 74(1): 1–9.
26. Netusil NR, Levin Z, Shandas V and Hart T (2014) Valuing green infrastructure in Portland, Oregon. Landscape and Urban Planning 124: 14–21. See http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0169204614000036 (accessed 29/05/ 2014).
27. Peters NE (1994) Hydrologic processes. In Biogeochemistry for Small Catchments: A Tool for Environmental Research (Moldan B and Cerny J (eds)). Wiley, Chichester, UK, Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (Scope), Scope 51.
28. Pitt M (2008) The Pitt Review – Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods: An Independent Review. Cabinet Office, London, UK.
29. Proshansky HM, Fabian AK and Kaminoff R (1983) Place-identity: physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3(1): 57–83.
30. Reinhardt G (2011) Portland advances green stormwater management practices. In Cities Going Green: A Handbook of Best Practices (Kemp RL and Stephani CJ (eds)). Shutterstock, Jefferson, North Carolina, USA.
31. Scottish Government (2003) The Water Environment and Water Services (Scotland) Act 2003 (Commencement No. 8) Order 2008. The Scottish Government, Edinburgh, UK, Scottish Statutory Instrument 2008 No. 269 (C. 22).
32. Shandas V, Nelson A, Arendes C and Cibor C (2010) Tabor to the River: An Evaluation of Outreach Efforts and Opportunities for Engaging Residents in Stormwater Management. Technical Report. City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services, Portland, Oregon, USA.
33. Tversky A and Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–1131.
34. Wengraf T (2001) Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods. Sage, London, UK.
35. Werritty A, Houston D, Ball T, Tavendale A and Black A (2007) Exploring the Social Impacts of Flood Risk and Flooding in Scotland. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.
36. World Bank (2014) Data: Urban Population (% of Total). See http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS (accessed 20/04/2014).
37. Zhou Q, Panduro TE, Thorsen BJ and Arnbjerg-Nielsen K (2013) Adaption to extreme rainfall with open urban drainage system: an integrated hydrological cost-benefit analysis. Environmental Management 51(3): 586–601.