Valuing green infrastructure in Portland, Oregon

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 124, Issue , 2014, Pages 14-21

  Netusil, Noelwah R ^a   Levin, Zachary ^a   Shandas, Vivek ^b   Hart, Ted ^b  

^a REED COLLEGE   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Green streets; Hedonic price method; Low impact development; Portland, Oregon; Stormwater

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS;

DESIGN COMPLEXITY; DISTANCE-BASED; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; HEDONIC PRICES; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; PORTLAND , OREGON; STORMWATERS; STREET NETWORK;

COST ESTIMATING;

CANOPY; CENSUS; GREENSPACE; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; PROPERTY MARKET; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; STREET CANYON;

OREGON; PORTLAND [OREGON]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84894425237     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alshalalfah B.W., Shalaby A.S. Case study: Relationship of walk access distance to transit with service, travel, and personal characteristics. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 2007, 133:114.
2. Anderson E.W. A guide for estimating cover. Rangelands 1986, 236-238.
3. Anderson S.T., West S.E. Open space, residential property values, and spatial context. Regonal Science and Urban Economics 2006, 36(6):773-789.
4. Anselin L. Exploring spatial data with GeoDa: A workbook 2005, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
5. Booth D.B., Jackson C.R. Urbanization of aquatic systems: Degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1997, 33(5):1077-1090.
6. Booth D.B., Karr J.R., Schauman S., Konrad C.P., Morley S.A., Larson M.G., et al. Reviving urban streams: Land use, hydrology, biology, and human behavior. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2004, 40(5):1351-1364.
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). Consumer price indexes overview.
8. City of Los Angeles Stormwater Program Draft Stormwater low impact development ordinance 2011, City of Los Angeles Stormwater Program, Los Angeles.
9. Coulson N.E., Zabel J.E. What Can We Learn from Hedonic Models When Housing Markets Are Dominated by Foreclosure?. Annual Review of Resource Economics 2013, 5(1):261-279.
10. Donovan G.H., Butry D.T. Trees in the city: Valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon. Landscape Urban Planning 2010, 94:77-83.
11. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). The clean water and drinking water infrastructure gap analysis.
12. Environmental Protection Agency. (2010a). Green infrastructure case studies: Municipal policies for managing stormwater with green infrastructure.
13. Environmental Protection Agency. (2010b). Low impact development (LID).
14. Environmental Services City of Portland. (2008). Stormwater management for clean rivers: Green Streets.
15. Environmental Services City of Portland. (2010). Green Street facilities in Portland, Oregon.
16. Environmental Services City of Portland. (2010a). What is grey to Green?
17. Environmental Services City of Portland. (2010b). Grey to Green elements.
18. Environmental Services City of Portland. (2011). Combined sewer overflow program progress report: January 2011 (Environmental Services, ed.). City of Portland.
19. Ewing R., Dumbaugh E. The built environment and traffic safety: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of Planning Literature 2009, 23(4):347-367.
20. Frank R. Why do Portland water customers pay so much? Because of big, needed projects-And small ones that some question 2011, The Oregonian, Portland.
21. Freeman A.M.I. The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods 2003, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
22. Hennings L., Soll J. Wildlife corridors and permeability: A literature review 2010, Metro Sustainability Center, Metro, Portland.
23. Iacono M., Krizek K.J., El-Geneidy A. Measuring non-motorized accessibility: Issues, alternatives, and execution. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(1):133-140.
24. Kadish J., Netusil N.R. Valuing vegetation in an urban watershed. Landscape Urban Planning 2011, 104(1):59-65.
25. Kazemi F., Beecham S., Gibbs J., Clay R. Factors affecting terrestrial invertebrate diversity in bioretention basins in an Australian urban environment. Landscape Urban Planning 2009, 92(3):304-313.
26. Kelejian H.H., Prucha I.R. Generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal Real Estate Finance and Economics 1998, 17(1):99-121.
27. Kim C.W., Phipps T.T., Anselin L. Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: A spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 45:24-39.
28. Le Coustumer S., Fletcher T., Deletic A., Barraud S. Hydraulic performance of biofilters for stormwater management: First lessons from both laboratory and field studies. Water Science Technology 2007, 56(10):93-100.
29. Leggett C.G., Bockstael N.E. Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2000, 39(2):121-144.
30. Lutzenhiser M., Netusil N.R. The effect of open spaces on a home's sale price. Contemporary Economic Policy 2001, 19(3):291-298.
31. Maas J., Verheij R.A., de Vries S., Spreeuwenberg P., Schellevis F.G., Groenewegen P.P. Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health 2009, 63(12):967-973.
32. Mahan B.L., Polasky S., Adams R.M. Valuing urban wetlands: A property price approach. Land Economics 2000, 76(1):100-113.
33. May C.W., Horner R.R., Karr J.R., Mar B.W., Welch E.B. Effects of urbanization on small streams in the Puget Sound ecoregion. Watershed Protection Techniques 1997, 2(4):483-494.
34. McPherson E.G., Maco S.E., Simpson J.R., Peper P.J., Xiao Q., VanDerZanden A.M. Western Washington and Oregon community tree guide: Benefits, costs, and strategic planting 2002, 1-76. Center for Urban Forest Research, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station.
35. Metro Data Resource Center. (2007). 2007 high resolution landcover-Shapefile version.
36. Metro Data Resource Center. (2009). RLIS lite. METRO Data Resource Center.
37. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., Polasky S., Tallis H., Cameron D.R., et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7(1):4-11.
38. Netusil N.R. Economic valuation of riparian corridors and upland wildlife habitat in an urban watershed. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education 2006, 134:39-45.
39. Netusil N.R., Chattopadhyay S., Kovacs K. Estimating the demand for tree canopy: A second-stage hedonic price analysis in Portland, Oregon. Land Economics 2010, 86(2):281-293.
40. NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources. (2010). Marine/anadromous fish species.
41. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. (2006). Portland harbor superfund site.
42. Poor P.J., Pessagno K.L., Paul R.W. Exploring the hedonic value of ambient water quality: A local watershed-based study. Ecological Economics 2007, 60(4):797-806.
43. Revkin A. Portland again tops a sustainable cities list 2008, The New York Times.
44. Sander H.A., Ghosh D., van Riper D., Manson S.M. How do you measure distance in spatial models? An example using open-space valuation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2010, 37(5):874-894.
45. Shandas, V., Nelson, A., Arendes, C., Cibor, C. (2010). Tabor to river: An evaluation of outreach efforts and opportunities for engaging residents in stormwater management.
46. Shandas V., Steele R., Nelson A. Tabor to the River program 2012, Bureau of Environmental Services, City of Portland.
47. Small K.A., Steimetz S.S. Spatial hedonics and the willingness to pay for residential amenities. Journal of Regional Sciences 2012, 52(4):635-647.
48. State of Washington Department of Ecology. (2012). Municipal stormwater general permit reissuance.
49. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency Green infrastructure case studies: Municipal policies for managing stormwater control with green infrastructure 2010, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds, Washington, DC.
50. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency A strategic agenda to protect waters and build more livable communities through infrastructure 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC.
51. United Nations World urbanization prospects: The 2007 revision 2008, United Nations, New York, NY.
52. Ward B., MacMullan E., Reich S. The effect of low-impact-development on property values. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 2008, 2008(6):318-323.
53. Williams E.S., Wise W.R. Economic impacts of alternative approaches to storm-water management and land development. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2009, 135(6):537-546.
54. Wise S., Braden J., Ghalayini D., Grant J., Kloss C., MacMullan E. Integrating valuation methods to recognize green infrastructure's multiple benefits 2010, Center for Neighborhood Technology, April.