Technological novelty profile and invention’s future impact

EPJ Data Science

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Kim, Daniel ^a,b,c   Cerigo, Daniel Burkhardt ^c   Jeong, Hawoong ^b,d   Youn, Hyejin ^a,c,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^c SANTA FE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d Asia Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics (APCTP)   (South Korea)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

co occurrence; invention; patent; patent citation; standard score; technological novelty; technology code

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS);

CO-OCCURRENCE; PATENT; PATENT CITATION; STANDARD SCORES; TECHNOLOGICAL NOVELTY;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84961238481     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21931127     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0069-1     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Youn H, Strumsky D, Bettencourt LMA, Lobo J (2015) Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents. J R Soc Interface 12:20150272
2. Schumpeter JA (1939) Business cycles. McGraw-Hill, New York
3. Nelson RR (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, London
4. Page SE (2008) The difference: how the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton
5. Evans JA, Foster JG (2011) Metaknowledge. Science 331:721-725
6. Wagner A, Rosen W (2014) Spaces of the possible: universal Darwinism and the wall between technological and biological innovation. J R Soc Interface 11(97):20131190
7. Corominas-Murtra B, Goñi J, Solé RV, Rodríguez-Caso C (2013) On the origins of hierarchy in complex networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(33):13316-13321
8. Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342:468-472
9. Della Malva A, Riccaboni M (2015) (Un) conventional combinations: at the origins of breakthrough inventions. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2610562
10. Strumsky D, Lobo J (2015) Identifying the sources of technological novelty in the process of invention. Res Policy 44(8):1445-1461
11. Yun J, Kim P-J, Jeong H (2015) Anatomy of scientific evolution. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0117388. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117388
12. Farmer DJ, Lafond L (2015) How predictable is technological progress? ArXiv preprint. arXiv:1502.05274
13. Wang J, Thijs B, Glänzel W (2015) Interdisciplinarity and impact: distinct effects of variety, balance, and disparity. PLoS ONE 10(5):e0127298. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127298
14. Sinatra R, Deville P, Szell M, Wang D, Barabási A (2015) A century of physics. Nat Phys 11(10):791-796
15. O’Neale DRJ, Hendy SC (2012) Power law distributions of patents as indicators of innovation. PLoS ONE 7:e49501. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049501
16. Bettencourt LMA, Samaniego H, Youn H (2014) Professional diversity and the productivity of cities. Sci Rep 4: 5393. doi:10.1038/srep05393
17. Youn H, Bettencourt L, Lobo J, Strumsky D, Samaniego H, West GB (2016) Scaling and universality in urban economic diversification. J R Soc Interface 13:20150937. doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0937
18. Jagmohan A, Li Y, Shao N, Sheopuri A, Wang D, Varshney LR, Huang P (2014) Exploring application domains for computational creativity. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on computational creativity
19. Calcagno V, Demoinet E, Gollner K, Guidi L, Ruths D, de Mazancourt C (2012) Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns. Science 338:1065-1069
20. Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT (2008) Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1118-1123
21. Börner K (2015) Atlas of knowledge: anyone can map. MIT Press, Cambridge
22. Eom Y, Fortunato S (2011) Characterizing and modeling citation dynamics. PLoS ONE 6(9):e24926. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024926
23. Wang D, Song C, Barabási A-L (2013) Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 342:127-132
24. Deville P, Wang D, Sinatra R, Song C, Blondel VD, Barabási A-L (2014) Career on the move: geography, stratification, and scientific impact. Sci Rep 4:4770. doi:10.1038/srep04770
25. Petersen AM, Fortunato S, Pan RK, Kaski K, Penner O, Rungi A, Riccaboni M, Stanley HE, Pammolli F (2014) Reputation and impact in academic careers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(43):15316-15321. doi:10.1073/pnas.1323111111
26. USX1I1 - Google patents. https://patents.google.com/patent/USX1/en
27. Electronic bulk data products - USPTO. http://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/electronic-bulk-data-products
28. Description of patent types. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/patdesc.htm
29. United States Patent and Trademark Office (2012) Overview of the U.S. patent classification system (USPC) Washington, DC
30. Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working paper 8498
31. Patent data project national bureau of economic research. https://sites.google.com/site/patentdataproject/Home
32. Benson CL, Magee CL (2015) Quantitative determination of technological improvement from patent data. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0121635. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121635
33. Valverde S, Solé RV, Bedau MA, Packard N (2007) Topology and evolution of technology innovation networks. Phys Rev E 76:056118. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.056118
34. Tibély G, Pollner P, Vicsek T, Palla G (2013) Extracting tag hierarchies. PLoS ONE 8(12):e84133. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084133
35. Ahn Y-Y, Ahnert SE, Bagrow JP, Barabási A-L (2011) Flavor network and the principles of food pairing. Sci Rep 1:196. doi:10.1038/srep00196
36. McNamee RC (2013) Can’t see the forest for the leaves: similarity and distance measures for hierarchical taxonomies with a patent classification example. Res Policy 42(4):855-873. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.006
37. Tria F, Loreto V, Servedio VDP, Strogatz SH (2014) The dynamics of correlated novelties. Sci Rep 4:5890
38. Arthur WB (2011) The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves, reprint edn, Free Press, New York
39. Kauffman SA (1996) Investigations: the nature of autonomous agents and the worlds they mutually create. Santa Fe Institute
40. Alstott J, Triulzi G, Yan B, Luo J (2015) Mapping technology space by normalizing technology relatedness networks. ArXiv preprint. arXiv:1509.07285
41. Hidalgo CA, Hausmann R (2009) The building blocks of economic complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(26):10570-10575. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900943106
42. numpy.median. http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.10.1/reference/generated/numpy.median.html
43. Smil V (2015) The miraculous 1880s. IEEE Spectr 52(7):26. doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2015.7131688
44. Arthur WB, Polak W (2006) The evolution of technology within a simple computer model. Complexity 11(5):23-31. doi:10.1002/cplx.20130
45. Thurner S, Klimek P, Hanel R (2010) Schumpeterian economic dynamics as a quantifiable model of evolution. New J Phys 12(7):075029. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/7/075029
46. Klimek P, Hausmann R, Thurner S (2012) Empirical confirmation of creative destruction from world trade data. PLoS ONE 7(6):e38924. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038924
47. Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Manag Sci 47(1):117-132. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
48. Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strateg Manag J 25(8-9):909-928. doi:10.1002/smj.384
49. Koh H, Magee CL (2008) A functional approach for studying technological progress: extension to energy technology. Technol Forecast Soc Change 75(6):735-758. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.05.007
50. McNerney J, Farmer JD, Redner S, Trancik JE (2011) Role of design complexity in technology improvement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(22):9008-9013. doi:10.1073/pnas.1017298108
51. Wagner C, Singer P, Strohmaier M (2014) The nature and evolution of online food preferences. EPJ Data Sci 3(1):38. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0036-7
52. Spence C, Wang QJ (2015) Wine and music (I): on the crossmodal matching of wine and music. Flavour 4(1):34. doi:10.1186/s13411-015-0045-x
53. Pinel F, Varshney LR (2014) Computational creativity for culinary recipes. In: CHI’14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 439-442. doi:10.1145/2559206.2574794
54. Pinel F, Varshney LR, Bhattacharjya D (2015) A culinary computational creativity system. In: Computational creativity research: towards creative machines. Atlantis thinking machines, vol 7, Springer, Berlin, pp 327-346
55. Liu Q, Chen E, Xiong H, Ge Y, Li Z, Wu X (2014) A cocktail approach for travel package recommendation. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(2):278-293
56. Lin Y, Kawakita Y, Suzuki E, Ichikawa H (2012) Personalized clothing-recommendation system based on a modified Bayesian network. In: 2012 IEEE/IPSJ 12th international symposium on applications and the internet (SAINT). IEEE, New York, pp 414-417