PEGylated NaHoF4 nanoparticles as contrast agents for both X-ray computed tomography and ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging

Biomaterials

Volumn 76, Issue , 2016, Pages 218-225

  Ni, Dalong ^a   Zhang, Jiawen ^b   Bu, Wenbo ^a   Zhang, Chen ^a   Yao, Zhenwei ^b   Xing, Huaiyong ^a   Wang, Jing ^b   Duan, Fei ^b   Liu, Yanyan ^a   Fan, Wenpei ^a   Feng, Xiaoyuan ^b   Shi, Jianlin ^a  

^a SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF CERAMICS   (China)

^b FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

CT; Dual modality imaging; Holmium; Relaxivity mechanism; Ultra high field MRI

Indexed keywords

HOLMIUM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETISM; MEDICAL IMAGING; NANOMAGNETICS; NANOPARTICLES; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL); TOMOGRAPHY; X RAY ABSORPTION;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS; DIFFERENT-MAGNETIC FIELDS; DIPOLAR RELAXATION MECHANISMS; DUAL-MODALITY IMAGING; RELAXIVITY; ULTRA HIGH FIELD MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ULTRA-HIGH FIELD MRIS; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; MACROGOL; NAHOF4 NANOPARTICLE; NANOPARTICLE; OLEIC ACID; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; HOLMIUM; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MAGNETIC FIELD; MOUSE; MTT ASSAY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYNTHESIS; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRA HIGH FIIELD NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; X RAY ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; CHEMISTRY; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PROCEDURES;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HOLMIUM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NANOPARTICLES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84961203293     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.063     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ripen M. Multimodality Imaging. Molecular Imaging Techniques: New Frontiers 2013, 162-176. Future Science Ltd.
2. Lee D.E., Koo H., Sun I.C., Ryu J.H., Kim K., Kwon I.C. Multifunctional nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and theragnosis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41:2656-2672.
3. Kim J., Piao Y., Hyeon T. Multifunctional nanostructured materials for multimodal imaging, and simultaneous imaging and therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38:372-390.
4. 4/ZnS hollow nanospheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131:11276-11277.
5. Howes P., Green M., Bowers A., Parker D., Varma G., Kallumadil M., et al. Magnetic conjugated polymer nanoparticles as bimodal imaging agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132:9833-9842.
6. Fan H.M., Olivo M., Shuter B., Yi J.B., Bhuvaneswari R., Tan H.R., et al. Quantum dot capped magnetite nanorings as high performance nanoprobe for multiphoton fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132:14803-14811.
7. Ni D., Zhang J., Bu W., Xing H., Han F., Xiao Q., et al. Dual-targeting upconversion nanoprobes across the blood-brain barrier for magnetic resonance/fluorescence imaging of intracranial glioblastoma. ACS Nano 2014, 8:1231-1242.
8. Lusic H., GrinstaffM.W. X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113:1641-1666.
9. Lee N., Choi S.H., Hyeon T. Nano-sized CT contrast agents. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25:2641-2660.
10. Bartling S.H., Budjan J., Aviv H., Haneder S., Kraenzlin B., Michaely H., et al. First multimodal rmbolization particles visible on X-ray/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Invest. Radiol. 2011, 46:178-186.
11. Nikolaou K., Poon M., Sirol M., Becker C.R., Fayad Z.A. Complementary results of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the heart and coronary arteries: a review and future outlook. Cardiol. Clin. 2003, 21:639-655.
12. Wang G., Zhang J., Gao H., Weir V., Yu H., Cong W., et al. Towards Omni-tomography-grand fusion of multiple modalities for simultaneous interior tomography. Plos One 2012, 7:e39700.
13. Branca M., Pelletier F., Cottin B., Ciuculescu D., Lin C.C., Serra R., et al. Design of FeBi nanoparticles for imaging applications. Faraday Discuss. 2014, 175:97-111.
14. 4/Au nanocomposite particles for targeted dual mode CT/MR imaging of tumors. Small 2015, 11:4584-4593.
15. Liang S., Zhou Q., Wang M., Zhu Y., Wu Q., Yang X. Water-soluble L-cysteine-coated FePt nanoparticles as dual MRI/CT imaging contrast agent for glioma. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10:2325-2333.
16. Wen S., Li K., Cai H., Chen Q., Shen M., Huang Y., et al. Multifunctional dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles for dual mode CT/MR imaging applications. Biomaterials 2013, 34:1570-1580.
17. x core/shell nanoparticles for simultaneous magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray computed tomography. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134:10309-10312.
18. Carril M., Fernández I., Rodríguez J., García I., Penadés S. Gold-coated iron oxide glyconanoparticles for MRI, CT, and US multimodal imaging. Par. Part Syst. Char. 2014, 31:81-87.
19. 3+-doped ZnO nanoparticles for dualmodal MRI/CT imaging. RSC Adv. 2014, 4:53561-53569.
20. 2-weighted MR and CT multimodal imaging. Nanoscale 2015, 7:15680-15688.
21. Vaughan J.T., Snyder C.J., DelaBarre L.J., Bolan P.J., Tian J., Bolinger L., et al. Whole-body imaging at 7T: preliminary results. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009, 61:244-248.
22. Rosenberg J.T., Kogot J.M., Lovingood D.D., Strouse G.F., Grant S.C. Intracellular bimodal nanoparticles based on quantum dots for high-field MRI at 21.1 T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010, 64:871-882.
23. Bulte J.W.M., Vymazal J., Brooks R.A., Pierpaoli C., Frank J.A. Frequency dependence of MR relaxation times II. Iron oxides. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 1993, 3:641-648.
24. Norek M., Peters J.A. MRI contrast agents based on dysprosium or holmium. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2011, 59:64-82.
25. Li L.L., Zhang R., Yin L., Zheng K., Qin W., Selvin P.R., et al. Biomimetic surface engineering of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles as versatile bioprobes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51:6121-6125.
26. Park J., An K., Hwang Y., Park J.G., Noh H.J., Kim J.Y., et al. Ultra-large-scale syntheses of monodisperse nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3:891-895.
27. 2 nanosheets as a multifunctional theranostic agent for in vivo dual-modal CT/photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26:1886-1893.
28. 5 nanoparticles: novel binary contrast agent for high-resolution in vivo x-ray computed tomography angiography. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2012, 1:461-466.
29. 5 nanoprobes as high-performance contrast agents for multi-modal CT imaging of ischemic stroke. Biomaterials 2015, 71:110-118.
30. 1 magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133:12624-12631.
31. 2 contrast agents for ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3:524-529.
32. 1 MRI contrast enhancement. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23:3714-3722.
33. Y-w Jun, Huh Y.-M., J-s Choi, Lee J.-H., Song H.-T., Kim, et al. Nanoscale size effect of magnetic nanocrystals and their utilization for cancer diagnosis via magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127:5732-5733.
34. 3 nanoparticles for optimal performance as an MRI contrast agent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130:5335-5340.
35. 2 contrast agent. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19:1874-1878.
36. Wang Y.X. Superparamagnetic iron oxide based MRI contrast agents: current status of clinical application. Quant. Imag. Med. Surg. 2011, 1:35-40.
37. Rohrer M., Bauer H., Mintorovitch J., Requardt M., Weinmann H.-J. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest. Radiol. 2005, 40:715-724.
38. Solomon I. Relaxation processes in a system of two spins. Phys. Rev. 1955, 99:559-565.
39. 3+-doped upconversion nanoprobes: relaxivity mechanism probing and sensitivity optimization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23:298-307.
40. Gueron M. Nuclear relaxation in macromolecules by paramagnetic ions: a novel mechanism. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 1975, 19:58-66.
41. 4 nanodots for efficient MR angiography and atherosclerotic plaque imaging. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26:3867-3872.
42. Kievit F.M., Zhang M. Cancer nanotheranostics: improving imaging and therapy by targeted delivery across biological barriers. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:H217-H247.
43. Choi H.S., Liu W., Misra P., Tanaka E., Zimmer J.P., Itty Ipe B., et al. Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25:1165-1170.
44. Le Duc G., Miladi I., Alric C., Mowat P., Brauer-Krisch E., Bouchet A., et al. Toward an image-guided microbeam radiation therapy using gadolinium-based nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2011, 5:9566-9574.
45. Xing H., Zheng X., Ren Q., Bu W., Ge W., Xiao Q., et al. Computed tomography imaging-guided radiotherapy by targeting upconversion nanocubes with significant imaging and radiosensitization enhancements. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3:1751.