Student perspective on using a virtual radiography simulation

Radiography

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 217-222

  Shanahan, Madeleine ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Diagnostic radiography; Projection VR; Student evaluation; Student perspective; Virtual simulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; MALE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PATIENT POSITIONING; PERCEPTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; RADIOGRAPHY; SELF EVALUATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; STUDENT SATISFACTION; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; VIRTUAL RADIOGRAPHY; VIRTUAL REALITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84961136419     PISSN: 10788174     EISSN: 15322831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 1 Health Workforce Australia, Use of simulated learning environments (SLE) in professional entry level curricula of selected professions in Australia. Australia. 2010.
2. 2 Medical Radiation Practice Board Australia, Accreditation standards: medical radiation practice. Australia. 2013.
3. 3 Thoirs, K., Giles, E., Barber, W., The use and perceptions of simulation in medical radiation science education. Radiogr 58:3 (2011), 5–11.
4. 4 Thoirs, K., Giles, E., Barber, W., Use of simulated learning environments in radiation science curricula Australia. 2010, Health Workforce Australia.
5. 5 James, J., Maude, P., Sim, J., McDonald, M., Using second life for health professional learning: informing multidisciplinary understanding. Int J Mod Educ Forum 1:1 (2012), 24–30.
6. 6 Bridge, P., Appleyard, R.M., Ward, J.W., Philips, R., Beavis, A.W., The development and evaluation of a virtual radiotherapy treatment machine using an immersive visualisation environment. Comput Educ 49:2 (2007), 481–494.
7. 7 James, S., Dumbleton, C., An evaluation of the utilisation of the virtual environment for radiotherapy training (VERT) in clinical radiotherapy centres across the UK. Radiography 19:2 (2013), 142–150.
8. 8 Green, D., Appleyard, R., The influence of VERT™ characteristics on the development of skills in skin apposition techniques. Radiography 17:3 (2011), 178–182.
9. 9 Bridge, P., Crowe, S.B., Gibson, G., Ellemor, N.J., Hargrave, C., Carmichael, M., A virtual radiation therapy workflow training simulation. Radiography 22:1 (2016), e59–e63.
10. 10 Mason, S.L., Radiography student perception of Clinical stressors. Radiol Technol 77:6 (2006), 437–450.
11. 11 Cosson, P., Willis, R.N., Comparison of student radiographers' performance in a real x-ray room after training with a screen based computer simulator. 2012 http://www.shaderware.com/distrib/etc/WhitePaper-ComparisonOfStudentRadiographersPerformanceInaRealXrayRoomAfterTrainingWithAScreenBasedComputerSimulator.pdf [Verified 15/10/2015].
12. 12 Cosson, P., Willis, R.N., Student radiographer perspectives on using a screen based computer simulator in diagnostic radiography. 2012 http://www.shaderware.com/distrib/etc/Whitepaper201211-StudentRadiographerPerspectivesOnUsingAScreenBasedComputerSimulatorInDiagnosticRadiography.pdf [Verified 15/10/2015].
13. 13 St John-Matthews, J., Gibbs, V., Messer, S., Extending the role of technology enhanced learning within an undergraduate radiography programme. Radiography 19:1 (2013), 67–72.
14. 14 Huffman, A.H., Whetten, J., Huffman, W.H., Using technology in higher education: the influence of gender roles on technology self-efficacy. Comput Hum Behav 29:4 (2013), 1779–1786.
15. 15 Teo, T., Fan, X., Du, J., Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: does gender matter?. Australas J Educ Technol 31:3 (2015), 235–251.
16. 16 Helsper, E.J., Eynon, R., Digital natives: where is the evidence?. Br Educ Res J 36:3 (2010), 503–520.
17. 17 Rodgers, C., Defining reflection: another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teach Coll Rec 104:4 (2002), 842–866.
18. 18 Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Marra, R.M., Crismond, D., Meaningful learning with technology. 3rd ed., 2008, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
19. 19 Jonassen, D.H., Computers as mind tools for schools: engaging critical thinking. 2nd ed., 2000, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
20. 20 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Allied health workforce 2012. National health workforce series 5. Cat. no. HWL 51. 2013, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Canberra.
21. 21 MacDonald-Hill, J.L., Warren-Forward, H.M., Feasibility study into the use of online instrumentation courses for medical radiation scientists. Radiography 21:3 (2015), 282–287.
22. 22 Medical Radiation Practice Board Australia, Professional capabilities for medical radiation practice. Australia. 2013.
23. 23 Australian Institute of Radiography, Professional practice standards for the accreditated practitioner. Australia. 2013.