Big data analysis of local government 3.0: Focusing on Gyeongsangbuk-do in Korea

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 110, Issue , 2016, Pages 3-12

  Jun, Chae Nam ^a   Chung, Chung Joo ^b  

^a The IMC   (South Korea)

^b Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Big data; Collaboration; Government 3.0; Innovation; Local governance; North Gyeongsang Province; Semantic analysis

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; SEMANTICS; URBAN GROWTH;

COLLABORATION; GOVERNMENT 3.0; LOCAL GOVERNANCE; NORTH GYEONGSANG PROVINCE; SEMANTIC ANALYSIS;

BIG DATA;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; INTERNET; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; SERVICE PROVISION;

EID: 84961131243     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Belanger, F., Carter, L., Digitizing government interactions with constituents: an historical review of e-government research in information systems. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13 (2012), 363–394.
2. Biddix, J.P., Chung, C., Park, H.W., The hybrid shift: evidencing a student-driven restructuring of the college classroom. Comput. Educ. 80 (2015), 162–175.
3. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., Freeman, L.C., Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. 2002, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
4. Carley, K.M., Columbus, D., Bigrigg, M., Kunkell, F., AutoMap User's Guide 2010. 2010, Institute for Software Research School of Computer Science. Carnegie Mellon University. (Retrieved from http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/publications/papers/CMU-ISR-10-121.pdf).
5. Carter, L., Belanger, F., The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf. Syst. J. 15 (2005), 5–25.
6. Cha, M., Kweon, S., A semantic network analysis of “creative economics” in news frame. Korean J. J. Commun. Stud. 59:2 (2015), 88–120.
7. Cho, S.E., Choi, M., Park, H.W., Government-civic group conflicts and communication strategy: a text analysis of TV debates on Korea's import of U.S. beef. J. Contemp. East. Asia 11:1 (2011), 1–20.
8. Chung, C., An analysis of the status of the triple helix and university–industry–government relationships in Asia. Scientometrics 99:1 (2014), 139–149.
9. Chung, C., Park, H.W., Textual analysis of a political message: the inaugural addresses of two Korean presidents. Soc. Sci. Inf. 49 (2010), 215–239.
10. Codagnone, C., Wimmer, M.A., Roadmapping Egovernment Research: Visions and Measures Towards Innovative Governments in 2020. Retrieved from http://www.egovrtd2020.org, 2007.
11. Diesner, J., Carley, K.M., Semantic networks. Encyclopedia of Social Networking, 766-769, 2011.
12. Dombrowki, L., Hayes, G.R., Mazmanian, M., E-government intermediaries and the challenges of access and trust. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact., 21(2), 2014 (Article 13).
13. Erkan, G., Radev, D.R., LexRank: graph-based centrality as salience in text summarization. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 22:1 (2004), 457–479.
14. Gartner Group, Key issues in e-government strategy and management. Research Notes, Key Issues, 2000, 23.
15. Gyeongsangbuk-do Province, Gyeongsangbuk-do Government 3.0. Retrieved from http://www.gb.go.kr/open_content/open_info/index.jsp?LARGE_CODE=860&MED IUM_CODE=5&SMALL_CODE=60&SMALL_CODE2=&SMALL_CODE3=&me nu_code=02947&target=main&URL=/open_content/executive/info_government/gb3 0_budget.jsp, 2015.
16. Hanneman, R.A., Riddle, M., Introduction to Social Network Methods. 2005, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA (Retrieved from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/).
17. Harper, L., Gov 2.0 Rises to the Next Level: Open Data in Action. Retrieved from http://opensource.com/government/13/3/future-gov-20, 2013.
18. Howard, A., Making Dollars and Sense of the Open Data Economy. 2012, O'Reilly Radar (Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/12/making-dollars-and-sense-of-the-open-data-economy.html).
19. Hsu, C., Park, S.J., Park, H.W., Political discourse among key twitter users: the case of Sejong City in South Korea. J. Contemp. East. Asia 12:1 (2013), 65–79.
20. Jang, H.Y., Exploring the structure of media criticism: a network analysis of the problems in Korean newspaper reporting. Korean J. Commun. Inf. 16 (2001), 108–134.
21. Jun, C.N., Seo, I.W., Analyzing the big data for practical using into technology marketing: focusing on the potential buyer extraction. J. Mark. Stud. 21:2 (2013), 181–203.
22. Jung, K., Park, H.W., A semantic (TRIZ) network analysis of South Korea's “open public data” policy. Gov. Inf. Q. 32 (2015), 353–358.
23. Jung, K., No, W., Kim, J.W., Who leads nonprofit advocacy through social media?: some evidence from the Australian Marine Conservation Society's twitter networks. J. Contemp. East. Asia 13:1 (2014), 69–81.
24. Kim, H.W., Jun, C.N., An exploratory study on content creation methods utilizing Big Data: linguistic and story resources for effective creation of TV home shopping content. J. Cybercommunication Acad. Soc. 31:3 (2014), 5–51.
25. Kim, J.W., Kim, Y., Suran, M., Emergency-response organization utilization of social media during a disaster: a case study of the 2013 Seoul floods. J. Contemp. East. Asia 14:2 (2015), 5–15.
26. King, S., Cotterill, S., Transformational government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public services. Local Gov. Stud. 33:3 (2007), 333–354.
27. Korea IT Times, Korea Unveils Its Gov 3.0 to Move Korea's E-gov to the Next Level. GeGF 2013. Retrieved from http://www.koreaittimes.com/story/32579/gegf-2013-korea-unveils-its-gov-30-move-korea%E2%80%99s-e-gov-next-level, 2013.
28. Korean Government, Government 3.0 Plan. Retrieved from http://www.gov30.kr, 2013.
29. Leydesdorff, L.A., Sociological Theory of Communication: The Self-Organization of the Knowledge-Based Society. 2001, Universal Publishers, Parkland, FL.
30. Liikanen, E., E-Government for Europe's Public Services of the Future. Retrieved from, 2003 http://www.uoc.edu/inaugural03/eng/article/20336.pdf.
31. Maio, A.D., Government 2.0: Gartner Definition. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/doc/1224639/government–gartner-definition, 2009.
32. Markoff, J., Entrepeneurs: see a web guided by commonsense. The New York Times. Business. November 12, 2006, 2006.
33. Mergel, I., Government 2.0 revisited: social media strategies in the public sector. PA Times 33:3 (2010), 7–10.
34. Mintz, D., Government 2.0—fact or fiction?. Public Manag. 36:4 (2007), 21–24.
35. Nam, T., Government 3.0 in Korea Fad or fashion?. ICEGOV ‘13 Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 2013, 46–55.
36. NIA, Government 3.0: Dreaming new Korea. Retrieved from http://www.gov30.kr, 2013.
37. NIA, Concepts and features of Government 2.0 and 3.0. Retrieved from http://www.nia.or.kr/english/BBS/board_view.asp?BoardID=201112221611231975& id=9270&Order=303&search_target=&keyword=&Flag=, 2008.
38. Nielsen, Data query top 10. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/kr/ko.html, 2015.
39. O'Neill, R.J. Jr., The Levers of Power: In 21st Century Governance. Supplement to Government Technology, January, 2001.
40. O'Reilly, T., What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html, 2005.
41. Park, H.W., Leydesdorff, L., Understanding the KrKwic: a computer program for the analysis of Korean text. J. Korean Data Anal. Soc. 6 (2004), 1377–1387.
42. Park, S., Opening Big Data analysis and application centers. ZDNet. October 24, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.zdnet.co.kr/news/news_view.asp?artice_id=20131024134751, 2013.
43. Rhee, Y., Potential and limitations of social media in nation branding. Proceeding from the International Symposium on nation branding and e-government (Presidential Council on Nation Branding), 2012, 41–67.
44. Saxena, K.B.C., Towards excellence in e-governance. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 18 (2005), 498–513.
45. Seneviratne, S.J., Information technology and organizational change in the public sector. Garson, G.D., (eds.) Information Technology and Computer Applications in Public Administration: Issues and Trends, 1999, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 41–61.
46. Shannon, V., A more revolutionary web. 2006, The New York Times (May 23, 2006, Retrieved from http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/23/business/web.php).
47. Sharma, S.K., Assessing e-government implementations. Electron. Gov. J. 1:2 (2004), 198–212.
48. Sharma, S.K., Gupta, J.N.D., Building blocks of an e-government: a framework. J. Electron. Commer. Organ. 1:4 (2003), 34–48.
49. Snead, J.T., Wright, E., E-government research in the United States. Gov. Inf. Q. 31 (2014), 129–136.
50. Son, D., Social Network Analysis. 2002, Kyungmoon, Seoul, Korea.
51. United Nations, Human development report 2011. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2011, 2011.
52. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Global e-Government Readiness Report 2004: Toward Access for Opportunity. 2004, Division for Public Economics and Public Administration, New York.
53. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations E-government Survey 2014: E-government for the Future we Want. 2014, Division for Public Economics and Public Administration, New York.
54. Valero, J.N., Effective leadership in public organizations: the impact of organizational structure in Asian countries. J. Contemp. East. Asia 14:2 (2015), 69–79.
55. Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T.A., Venkatraman, S., Understanding e-government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics. Inf. Syst. J. 24 (2014), 249–269.
56. Vicente, M.R., Novo, A., An empirical analysis of e-participation: the role of social networks and e-government over citizens’ online engagement. Gov. Inf. Q. 31 (2014), 379–387.
57. Wasserman, S., Faust, K., Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York.
58. West, D.M., E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm. Rev. 64:1 (2004), 15–27.
59. Williams, J., Introducing the Concept of Web 3.0. Retrieved from http://www.tweakandtrick.com/2012/05/web-30.html, 2012.
60. World Bank, Definition of E-government. 2011 Retrieved from http://web.worldbank.org.
61. Zhang, H., Fiszman, M., Shin, D., Miller, C.M., Rosemblat, G., Rindflesch, T.C., Degree centrality for semantic abstraction summarization of therapeutic studies. J. Biomed. Inform. 44:5 (2011), 830–838.
62. Zhang, X., Cheng, G., Qu, Y., Ontology summarization based on RDF sentence graph. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web., 2007, 707–716.