A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1452-1453

  Alviggi, Carlo ^a   Andersen, Claus Y ^b   Buehler, Klaus ^c   Conforti, Alessandro ^a   De Placido, Giuseppe ^a   Esteves, Sandro C ^d   Fischer, Robert ^e   Galliano, Daniela ^f   Polyzos, Nikolaos P ^g   Sunkara, Sesh K ^h   Ubaldi, Filippo M ⁱ   Humaidan, Peter ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b Mental Health Services CPH   (Denmark)

^c and Reproductive Medicine   (Germany)

^d Androfert   (Brazil)

^e Fertility Center Hamburg   (Germany)

^f INSTITUTO VALENCIANO DE INFERTILIDAD   (Spain)

^g CENTRE FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE   (Belgium)

^h QUEEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ Valle Giulia Clinic   (Italy)

^j SKIVE REGIONAL HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOLLITROPIN; GONADORELIN; GONADOTROPIN; MUELLERIAN INHIBITING FACTOR; FERTILITY PROMOTING AGENT;

ANEUPLOIDY; EDITORIAL; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; MATERNAL AGE; OOCYTE; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OVARIAN RESERVE; OVARY FOLLICLE CELL; OVULATION INDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ADULT; DRUG EFFECTS; FEMALE INFERTILITY; OVARY; OVULATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; FEMALE; FERTILITY AGENTS, FEMALE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; MATERNAL AGE; OVARIAN RESERVE; OVARY; OVULATION; OVULATION INDUCTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84960967933     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. 1 Polyzos, N.P., Devroey, P., A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel?. Fertil Steril, 96, 2011 1058–61.e7.
2. 2 Ferraretti, A.P., la Marca, A., Fauser, B.C., Tarlatzis, B., Nargund, G., Gianaroli, L., ESHRE consensus on the definition of “poor response” to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 26 (2011), 1616–1624.
3. 3 Papathanasiou, A., Implementing the ESHRE “poor responder” criteria in research studies: methodological implications. Hum Reprod 29 (2014), 1835–1838.
4. 4 Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, Polyzos NP. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Hum Reprod 2016;31:370–376.
5. 5 Alviggi, C., Pettersson, K., Longobardi, S., Andersen, C.Y., Conforti, A., De Rosa, P., et al. A common polymorphic allele of the LH beta-subunit gene is associated with higher exogenous FSH consumption during controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 1, 2013, 51.