Extending UML to support domain analysis

Proceedings ASE 2000: 15th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 321-324

  Morisio, M ^a,c   Travassos, G H ^b,c   Stark, M E ^c  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^c ESEG UM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; MODELING LANGUAGES; NASA; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SPACE FLIGHT;

BOARD SATELLITES; DOMAIN ANALYSIS; DOMAIN ENGINEERING; GUIDANCE , NAVIGATION AND CONTROLS; NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; SUPPORTING TOOL; UML(UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE);

UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

EID: 84960935786     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2000.873688     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Software Productivity Consortium, Reuse-Driven Software Processes Guidebook, SPC-92019-CMC version 02.00.03 November 1993.
2. Weiss, David M. and Chi Tau Robert Lai Software Product-Line Engineering: A Family-Based Software Development Approach. Addison-Wesley, 1999
3. th CaiSE/IFIP8.1 International workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD'99), Heidelberg, Germany, June 1999.
4. K. M. Oliveira, A. R. C. Rocha, G. H. Travassos, C. S. Menezes. Using Domain Knowledge in Software Development Environments, SEKE'99, Kaiserslauten, Germany, 1999
5. st International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM Press, pp. 544-554, 1999.
6. M. Svahnberg and J. Bosch. Evolution in Software Product Lines: Two Cases. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, 11, 391-422 (1999)
7. John Foreman. Product Line Based Software Development-Significant Results, Future Challenges. Software Technology Conf., Salt Lake City, UT, 1996.
8. G. Arango. Software reusability, chapter 2. Domain Analysis Methods, pages 17-49. Workshops M. E. Horwood, London 1994.
9. K. Kang, et al. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study (CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, ADA 235785). Pittsburgh, PA: SEI CMU, 1990.
10. J. Bayer, O. Flege, Knauber P., et al., PuLSE: A methodology to develop software product lines, Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR99), May 1999.
11. D. Weiss, Commonality Analysis: A Systematic Process for Defining Families, 2nd Int. Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architectures for Product Families, February 1998
12. S. Gossain, D. Batory, H. Gomaa, M. Lubars, C. Pidgeon, and E. Seidewitz, Objects and domain engineering (panel), Proceedings of OOPSLA95, 1995.
13. S. Cohen, L. M. Northrop, Object-Oriented Technology and Domain Analysis, Fifth International Conference of Software Reuse, June 1998.
14. B. Keepence, M. Mannion, Using Patterns to Model Variability in Product Families, IEEE Software, July 1999, pp. 102-108.
15. Rumbaugh, James, Ivar Jacobson, Grady Booch, The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, Addison-Wesley, 1998.
16. Software Engineering Laboratory, Product line development approach for flight software, SEL Study Brief, July 2000.