Customizing driving cycles to support vehicle purchase and use decisions: Fuel economy estimation for alternative fuel vehicle users

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 67, Issue , 2016, Pages 280-298

  Liu, Jun ^a   Wang, Xin ^b   Khattak, Asad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative fuel vehicle; Cluster analysis; Driving cycle; Fuel economy; Micro trips

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE FUELS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENERGY SECURITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; FORECASTING; SALES;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES; CASE BASED SYSTEMS; DRIVING CYCLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY'S; LABORATORY CONDITIONS; MICRO-TRIPS; REAL-WORLD DRIVINGS; VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES;

FUEL ECONOMY;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FUEL CONSUMPTION; MOBILITY; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84960923066     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.02.016     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. André M. The ARTEMIS European driving cycles for measuring car pollutant emissions. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 334:73-84.
2. André M., Joumard R., Vidon R., Tassel P., Perret P. Real-world European driving cycles, for measuring pollutant emissions from high-and low-powered cars. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40:5944-5953.
3. Andrei P. Real World Heavy-duty Vehicle Emissions Modeling 2001, West Virginia University.
4. Atlanta Regional Commission Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) Regional Travel Survey (accessed 08-01-2014). http://www.elsevier.com/xml/linking-roles/text/html.
5. Berry I. The Effects of Driving Style and Vehicle Performance on the Real-World Fuel Consumption of U.S. Light-Duty Vehicles 2010, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
6. Brady M.J., O'Mahony M. The development of a driving cycle for the greater Dublin area using a large database of driving data with a stochastic and statistical methodology. Irish Transport Research Network Conference 2013, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
7. Bunch D.S., Bradley M., Golob T.F., Kitamura R., Occhiuzzo G.P. Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: a discrete-choice stated preference pilot project. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 1993, 27:237-253.
8. Caltrans California Household Travel Survey (accessed May 2nd 2014). http://www.elsevier.com/xml/linking-roles/text/html.
9. Campbell K.L. The SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study: Addressing Driver Performance and Behavior in Traffic Safety. TR News 2012.
10. Davis S., Diegel S., Boundy R. Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 28, ORNl-6984 2009, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. http://www.cta.ornl.gov/dataS.
11. Delucchi M.A., Lipman T.E. An analysis of the retail and lifecycle cost of battery-powered electric vehicles. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2001, 6:371-404.
12. EPA Final Technical Report on Aggressive Driving Behavior for the Revised Federal Test Procedure Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 1995, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
13. EPA Dynamometer Drive Schedules (accessed March 3rd 2014). http://www.elsevier.com/xml/linking-roles/text/html.
14. Fincher S., Palacios C., Kishan S., Preusse D., Perez H. Modifying Link-Level Emissions Modeling Procedures for Applications within the MOVES Framework. DTFH61-09-C-00028 2010, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
15. Fontaras G., Pistikopoulos P., Samaras Z. Experimental evaluation of hybrid vehicle fuel economy and pollutant emissions over real-world simulation driving cycles. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42:4023-4035.
16. 2 emissions from new passenger cars based on independent experimental data. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2239-2248.
17. Frey H.C., Rouphail N.M., Zhai H., Farias T.L., Gonçalves G.A. Comparing real-world fuel consumption for diesel-and hydrogen-fueled transit buses and implication for emissions. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2007, 12:281-291.
18. Greene, D.L., 2010. How Consumers Value Fuel Economy: A Literature Review.
19. Greene D.L. Uncertainty, loss aversion, and markets for energy efficiency. Energy Econ. 2011, 33:608-616.
20. Greene D.L., Evans D.H., Hiestand J. Survey evidence on the willingness of US consumers to pay for automotive fuel economy. Energy Policy 2013, 61:1539-1550.
21. Hartigan J.A., Wong M.A. Algorithm AS 136: a k-means clustering algorithm. Appl. Stat. 1979, 100-108.
22. Holm, P., Tomich, D., Sloboden, J., Lowrance, C., 2007. Traffic analysis toolbox, vol. iv: Guidelines for Applying Corsim Microsimulation Modeling Software.
23. Hung W., Tong H., Lee C., Ha K., Pao L. Development of a practical driving cycle construction methodology: a case study in Hong Kong. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2007, 12:115-128.
24. Kamble S.H., Mathew T.V., Sharma G. Development of real-world driving cycle: case study of Pune, India. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2009, 14:132-140.
25. Kent J., Allen G., Rule G. A driving cycle for Sydney. Transport. Res. 1978, 12:147-152.
26. Khattak A., Kanafani A. Case-based reasoning: a planning tool for intelligent transportation systems. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 1996, 4:267-288.
27. Khattak A.J., Dahlgren J.W., McDonough P. Tools for supporting implementation decisions of intelligent transportation system. Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board 2006, 1944:41-50.
28. Lave L.B., MacLean H.L. An environmental-economic evaluation of hybrid electric vehicles: Toyota's Prius vs. its conventional internal combustion engine Corolla. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2002, 7:155-162.
29. Lin J., Niemeier D.A. An exploratory analysis comparing a stochastic driving cycle to California's regulatory cycle. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36:5759-5770.
30. Lin J., Niemeier D.A. Estimating regional air quality vehicle emission inventories: constructing robust driving cycles. Transport. Sci. 2003, 37:330-346.
31. Lin, Z., Greene, D., 2011. Predicting Individual Fuel Economy. 2011-01-0618, SAE Technical Paper.
32. Liu J., Khattak A., Wang X. Creating indices for how people drive in a region: a comparative study of driving performance. 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington, DC 2015.
33. Liu J., Khattak A., Wang X. The role of alternative fuel vehicles: using behavioral and sensor data to model hierarchies in travel. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2015, 55:379-392. 10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.028.
34. Liu J., Wang X., Khattak A. Generating real-time driving volatility information. 2014 World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Detroit, MI 2014.
35. Lyons T., Kenworthy J., Austin P., Newman P. The development of a driving cycle for fuel consumption and emissions evaluation. Transport. Res. Part A: Gen. 1986, 20:447-462.
36. Markel T., Simpson A. Cost-benefit analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle technology. 22nd International Electric Vehicle Symposium 2006.
37. Nesbitt K., Sperling D. Myths regarding alternative fuel vehicle demand by light-duty vehicle fleets. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 1998, 3:259-269.
38. Ntziachristos L., Samaras Z. Speed-dependent representative emission factors for catalyst passenger cars and influencing parameters. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34:4611-4619.
39. Saleh W., Kumar R., Kirby H., Kumar P. Real world driving cycle for motorcycles in Edinburgh. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2009, 14:326-333.
40. SAS SAS Technical Report A-108, Cubic Clustering Criterion 1983, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
41. Song Y.-Y., Yao E.-J., Zuo T., Lang Z.-F. Emissions and fuel consumption modeling for evaluating environmental effectiveness of ITS strategies. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2013.
42. Struben J., Sterman J. Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 2008, 35:1070-1097.
43. Tong H., Hung W., Cheung C. Development of a driving cycle for Hong Kong. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33:2323-2335.
44. Turrentine T.S., Kurani K.S. Car buyers and fuel economy?. Energy Policy 2007, 35:1213-1223.
45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012. Joint Technical Support Document: Final Rulemaking for 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. EPA-420-R-12-901, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Ann Arbor, MI.
46. Wang H., Fu L., Zhou Y., Li H. Modelling of the fuel consumption for passenger cars regarding driving characteristics. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2008, 13:479-482.
47. Wang Q., Huo H., He K., Yao Z., Zhang Q. Characterization of vehicle driving patterns and development of driving cycles in Chinese cities. Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2008, 13:289-297.
48. Wang X., Khattak A., Liu J., Masghati-Amoli G., Son S. What is the level of volatility in instantaneous driving decisions?. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2015, 10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.014.
49. Wikipedia Alternative Fuel Vehicle (accessed February 10 2015). http://www.elsevier.com/xml/linking-roles/text/html.
50. Zhai H., Frey H.C., Rouphail N.M. A vehicle-specific power approach to speed-and facility-specific emissions estimates for diesel transit buses. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:7985-7991.