Survey evidence on the willingness of U.S. consumers to pay for automotive fuel economy

Energy Policy

Volumn 61, Issue , 2013, Pages 1539-1550

  Greene, David L ^a   Evans, David H ^b   Hiestand, John ^c  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy paradox; Fuel economy; Loss aversion

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR-BASED; ENERGY PARADOX; EXPECTED VALUES; LOSS AVERSION; PAYBACK PERIODS; PROSPECT THEORY; VEHICLE FUEL ECONOMY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

INVESTMENTS; SURVEYS;

FUEL ECONOMY;

AUTOMOBILE; ENERGY CONSERVATION; FUEL CONSUMPTION; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; PRICE DYNAMICS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84881665338     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.050     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. (ACEEE) American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, 2007. Quantifying the Effects of Market Failures in the End Use of Energy, Final Draft Report Prepared for the International Energy Agency, Washington, DC, February.
2. Allcott H., Greenstone M. Is there an energy efficiency gap?. Journal of Economic Perscpectives 2012, 26:3-28.
3. Allcott, H., Wozny, N., 2009. Gasoline Prices, Inattentive Consumers, and the Energy Paradox, Working Paper, Harvard Energy Technology Innovation Policy Group and Harvard University Center for the Environment, July 19.
4. Benartzi S., Thaler R. Myopic loss aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995, 110:73-92.
5. Bento, A. M., Li, S. Roth, K., 2010. Is There an Energy Paradox? Discussion Paper. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
6. Davis, S.C., Diegel, S. W., Boundy, R.G., 2012. Transportation Energy Data Book, ed. 31, ORNL-6987, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, July.
7. DellaVigna S. Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature 2009, 47(2):315-372.
8. (EIA) Energy Information Administration, 1996. Issues in Midterm Analysis and Forecasting 1996, DOE/EIA-0607(96), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
9. (EIA) Energy Information Administration, 2013. Monthly Energy Review, Table 9.4 Motor Gasoline Retail Prices, U.S. City Average, available at, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, January. http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/#prices.
10. Fischer C., Harrington W., Parry I.W.H. Should automobile fuel economy standards be tightened?. Energy Journal 2007, 28:1-30.
11. Gächter, S., Herrmann, A., Johnson, E.J., 2007. Individual- Level Loss Aversion in Riskless and Risky Choices. Discussion Paper Series. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn.
12. Greene, D.L., 2010. How Consumers Value fuel Economy: A Literature Review, EPA-420-R-10-008, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March.
13. Greene D.L. Uncertainty, loss aversion, and markets for energy efficiency. Energy Economics 2011, 33(4):608-616.
14. Hassett K.A., Metcalf G.E. Energy conservation investment: do consumers discount the future correctly?. Energy Policy 1993, 21(6):710-716.
15. Hausman J. Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables. Bell Journal of Economics 1979, 10(1):33-54.
16. Helfand G., Wolverton A. Evaluating the consumer response to fuel economy: a review of the literature,". International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 2011, 5(2):103-146.
17. Horowitz J.K., McConnell K.E. A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2002, 44:426-447.
18. Howarth R.B., Sanstad A.H. Discount rates and energy efficiency. Contemporary Economic Policy 1995, 13(3):101-109.
19. Jaffe A.B., Stavins R.N. The energy-efficiency gap: what does it mean?. Energy Policy 1994, 22(10):804-810.
20. Kahneman D. Thinking Fast and Slow, Farrar 2011, Straus and Giroux, New York.
21. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 1991, 39:341-350.
22. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992, 5:297-323.
23. Klapper D., Ebling C., Temme J. Another look at loss aversion in brand choice: can we characterize the loss averse consumer?. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2005, 22:239-254.
24. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1991, 5:193-206.
25. Larrick R.P., Soll J.B. The MPG Illusion. Science 2008, 320:1593-1594.
26. Machina, M.J., 2008. Non-expected Utility theory, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, second ed., S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume, (Eds.), available on line at http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_N000081.
27. ORC International, 2013. Telephone CARAVAN® Consumer Omnibus. http://www.orcinternational.com/US/services/Additional-Services/Documents/Non%20Price%20-%20Telephone%20CARAVAN%20Rate%20Card%20-%202.pdf.
28. (ORC) Opinion Research Corporation, 2004. Caravan ORC Study # 713218 for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, May 20.
29. (ORC) Opinion Research Corporation, 2011. Caravan ORC Study #720229. In: Fuel Economy Survey, Princeton, NJ, June 3-6.
30. (ORC) Opinion Research Corporation, 2012. Caravan ORC Study #721159. In: Vehicle Willingness to Pay, Princeton, NJ, April 13-16.
31. (ORC) Opinion Research Corporation, 2013. Caravan ORC Study #722038/74403. In: Vehicle Willingness to Pay, Princeton, NJ, January 17-20.
32. Quantitative Micro Software, 2007. EViews6, Irvine, California.
33. Tom S.M., Fox C.R., Trepel C., Poldrack R.A. The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science 2007, 315:515-518.
34. Train K. Discount rates in consumers' energy-related decisions: a review of the literature. Energy 1985, 10(12):1243-1253.
35. Turrentine T.S., Kurani K.S. Car buyers and fuel economy?. Energy Policy 2007, 35:1213-1223.
36. Tversky A., Simonson I. Context-dependent preferences. Management Science 1993, 39:1179-1189.
37. (USDOT) U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2006. Vehicle Survivability and Travel Mileage Schedules, DOT HS 809 952, Washington, DC.
38. (USDOT) U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2013. "Obama administration finalizes historic 54.5mpg fuel efficiency standards,". http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2012/Obama+Administration+Finalizes+Historic+54.5+mpg+Fuel+Efficiency+Standards.
39. (USEIA) U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2013, Annual Energy Review, table 5.24,, Monthly Energy Review, table 9.4. http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/sec9_6.pdf.
40. (USEPA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012. 2017 and later model year light duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Final Rule, Federal Register, vol. 77, no. 199, pp. 62623-63200, available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-10-15/pdf/2012-21972.pdf.