In silico assessment of primers for eDNA studies using PrimerTree and application to characterize the biodiversity surrounding the Cuyahoga River

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Cannon, M V ^a   Hester, J ^a,c   Shalkhauser, A ^a   Chan, E R ^a,b   Logue, K ^a   Small, S T ^a,b   Serre, D ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RStudio Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIRD; CARP; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MAMMAL; METAGENOMICS; PLANT; RIVER; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AMPHIBIANS; ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIRDS; CARPS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MAMMALS; METAGENOMICS; PLANTS; RIVERS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84960889076     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep22908     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Hajibabaei, M. & Rieseberg, L. H. Environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1789-1793 (2012).
2. Rusch, D. B. et al. The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition: northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific. PLOS Biol. 5, e77 (2007).
3. Venter, J. C. et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304, 66-74 (2004).
4. Minamoto, T., Yamanaka, H., Takahara, T., Honjo, M. N. & Kawabata, Z. i. Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA. Limnology 13, 193-197 (2011).
5. Goldberg, C. S., Pilliod, D. S., Arkle, R. S. & Waits, L. P. Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLOS One 6, e22746 (2011).
6. Biggs, J. et al. Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Biol. Conserv. 183, 19-28 (2015).
7. Pilliod, D. S., Goldberg, C. S., Arkle, R. S. & Waits, L. P. Factors influencing detection of eDNA from a stream-dwelling amphibian. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 109-116 (2014).
8. Tréguier, A. et al. Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkiiin freshwater ponds. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 871-879 (2014).
9. Mahon, A. R. et al. Validation of eDNA surveillance sensitivity for detection of Asian carps in controlled and field experiments. PLOS One 8, e58316 (2013).
10. Kuczynski, J. et al. Microbial community resemblance methods differ in their ability to detect biologically relevant patterns. Nat. Meth. 7, 813-819 (2010).
11. Taylor, P. G. Reproducibility of ancient DNA sequences from extinct Pleistocene fauna. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 283-285 (1996).
12. Thomsen, P. F. et al. Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2565-2573 (2012).
13. Epp, L. S. et al. New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1821-1833 (2012).
14. Zeale, M. R., Butlin, R. K., Barker, G. L., Lees, D. C. & Jones, G. Taxon-specific PCR for DNA barcoding arthropod prey in bat faeces. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11, 236-244 (2011).
15. Bissett, A., Gibson, J. A. E., Jarman, S. N., Swadling, K. M. & Cromer, L. Isolation, amplification, and identification of ancient copepod DNA from lake sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth. 3, 533-542 (2005).
16. Taberlet, P. et al. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, e14 (2007).
17. Baker, G. C., Smith, J. J. & Cowan, D. A. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J. Microbiol. Meth. 55, 541-555 (2003).
18. Zimmermann, J., Jahn, R. & Gemeinholzer, B. Barcoding diatoms: evaluation of the V4 subregion on the 18S rRNA gene, including new primers and protocols. Org. Divers. Evol. 11, 173-192 (2011).
19. Ye, J. et al. Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC bioinformatics 13, 134 (2012).
20. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).
21. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289-290 (2004).
22. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, 1-212 (2009).
23. Chan, E. R. et al. A novel method for determining microflora composition using dynamic phylogenetic analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA deep sequencing data. Genomics 98, 253-259 (2011).
24. Deiner, K., Walser, J.-C., Mächler, E. & Altermatt, F. Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA. Biol. Conserv. 183, 53-63 (2015).
25. Sherwood, A. R. & Presting, G. G. Universal primers amplify a 23s rDNA plastid marker in eukaryotic algae and cyanobacteria. J. Phycol. 43, 605-608 (2007).
26. Masella, A. P., Bartram, A. K., Truszkowski, J. M., Brown, D. G. & Neufeld, J. D. PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 31 (2012).
27. Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537-7541 (2009).
28. Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Meth. 7, 335-336 (2010).
29. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
30. Ogram, A., Sayler, G. S. & Barkay, T. The extraction and purification of microbial DNA from sediments. J. Microbiol. Meth. 7, 57-66 (1987).
31. Tringe, S. G. et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science 308, 554-557 (2005).
32. Ficetola, G. F., Miaud, C., Pompanon, F. & Taberlet, P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol. Lett. 4, 423-425 (2008).
33. Bik, H. M. et al. Metagenetic community analysis of microbial eukaryotes illuminates biogeographic patterns in deep-sea and shallow water sediments. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1048-1059 (2012).
34. Hirai, J., Kuriyama, M., Ichikawa, T., Hidaka, K. & Tsuda, A. A metagenetic approach for revealing community structure of marine planktonic copepods. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 68-80 (2015).
35. Andersen, K. et al. Meta-barcoding of 'dirt' DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1966-1979 (2012).
36. Kelly, R. P., Port, J. A., Yamahara, K. M. & Crowder, L. B. Using environmental DNA to census marine fishes in a large mesocosm. PLOS One 9, e86175 (2014).
37. Mächler, E., Deiner, K., Steinmann, P. & Altermatt, F. Utility of Environmental DNA for Monitoring Rare and Indicator Macroinvertebrate Species. Freshwater Science 33, 1174-1183 (2014).
38. Deiner, K. & Altermatt, F. Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLOS One 9, e88786 (2014).
39. Ficetola, G. F. et al. An in silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes. BMC Genomics 11, 434 (2010).
40. Rees, H. C. et al. REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA-a review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1450-1459 (2014).
41. Turner, C. R. et al. Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial eDNA. Meth. Ecol. Evol. 5, 676-684 (2014).
42. Pinol, J., Mir, G., Gomez-Polo, P. & Agusti, N. Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 819-830 (2015).
43. Elbrecht, V. & Leese, F. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass-Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol. PLOS One 10, e0130324 (2015).
44. Hajibabaei, M., Spall, J. L., Shokralla, S. & van Konynenburg, S. Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol. BMC Ecol. 12, 28 (2012).
45. Gibson, J. et al. Simultaneous assessment of the macrobiome and microbiome in a bulk sample of tropical arthropods through DNA metasystematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8007-8012 (2014).
46. Cowart, D. A. et al. Metabarcoding is powerful yet still blind: a comparative analysis of morphological and molecular surveys of seagrass communities. PLOS One 10, e0117562 (2015).