Interaction matters: A perceived social partner alters the neural processing of human speech

NeuroImage

Volumn 129, Issue , 2016, Pages 480-488

  Rice, Katherine ^a   Redcay, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; fMRI; Mentalizing; Social interaction; Theory of mind

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUTISTIC LIKE TRAIT; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL COGNITION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SPEECH; VIGNETTE; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; IMAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THEORY OF MIND; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THEORY OF MIND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84960809062     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.041     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Barman A., Richter S., Soch J., Deibele A., Richter A., Assmann A., Schott B.H. Gender-specific modulation of neural mechanisms underlying social reward processing by Autism Quotient. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2015, 10:1537-1547.
2. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Skinner R., Martin J., Clubley E. The autism-spectrum quotient AQ: evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2001, 31:5-17.
3. Bayliss A.P., Tipper S.P. Gaze and arrow cueing of attention reveals individual differences along the autism spectrum as a function of target context. Br. J. Psychol. 2005, 96:95-114.
4. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int. 2002, 5:341-345.
5. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 1997, 10:433-436.
6. Chevallier C., Kohls G., Troiani V., Brodkin E.S., Schultz R.T. The social motivation theory of autism. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 164:231-239.
7. Clark H.H. Using Language 1996, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
8. Coricelli G., Nagel R. Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:9163-9168.
9. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance NeuroImages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996, 29:162-173.
10. Decety J., Lamm C. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist 2007, 13:580-593.
11. Dodell-Feder D., Koster-Hale J., Bedny M., Saxe R. fMRI item analysis in a theory of mind task. NeuroImage 2011, 55:705-712.
12. Dufour N., Redcay E., Young L., Mavros P.L., Moran J.M., Triantafyllou C., Gabrielli J.D.E., Saxe R. Similar brain activation during false belief tasks in a large sample of adults with and without autism. PLoS One 2013, 8(9).
13. Fox J., Ahn S.J., Janssen J.H., Yeykelis L., Segovia K.Y., Bailenson J.N. Avatars versus agents: a meta-analysis quantifying the effect of agency on social influence. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2015, 30:401-432.
14. Freeth M., Foulsham T., Kingstone A. What affects social attention? Social presence, eye contact and autistic traits. PLoS One 2013, 8(1).
15. Frith C.D., Frith U. The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 2006, 504:531-534.
16. Gallagher H.L., Jack A.I., Roepstorff A., Frith C.D. Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. NeuroImage 2002, 163:814-821.
17. Gallotti M., Frith C.D. Social cognition in the we-mode. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 174:160-165.
18. Garrod S., Pickering M.J. Why is conversation so easy?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:8-11.
19. Goldstein M.H., Schwade J.A. Social feedback to infants' babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19:515-523.
20. Hasegawa N., Kitamura H., Murakami H., Kameyama S., Sasagawa M., Egawa J., Someya T. Neural activity in the posterior superior temporal region during eye contact perception correlates with autistic traits. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 549:45-50.
21. Holler J., et al. Eye'm talking to you: speakers' gaze direction modulates co-speech gesture processing in the right MTG. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2015, 10:255-261.
22. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 1979, 6:65-70.
23. Izuma K., Matsumoto K., Camerer C.F., Adolphs R. Insensitivity to social reputation in autism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:17302-17307.
24. Kampe K.K., Frith C.D., Frith U. "Hey John": signals conveying communicative intention toward the self activate brain regions associated with "mentalizing", regardless of modality. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:5258-5263.
25. Klin A., Jones W., Schultz R., Volkmar F. The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: lessons from autism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 358:345-360.
26. Kopp S. Social resonance and embodied coordination in face-to-face conversation with artificial interlocutors. Speech Comm. 2010, 52:587-597.
27. Kuhl P.K. Is speech learning 'gated' by the social brain?. Dev. Sci. 2007, 10:110-120.
28. Kuhl P.K. Social mechanisms in early language acquisition: understanding integrated systems supporting language. The Oxford Handbook of Social Neuroscience 2011, 649-667. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Decety, J.T. Cacioppo (Eds.).
29. Kuhl P.K., Tsao F.M., Liu H.M. Foreign-language experience in infancy: effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:9096-9101.
30. Laidlaw K.E., Foulsham T., Kuhn G., Kingstone A. Potential social interactions are important to social attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:5548-5553.
31. Mar R.A. The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2011, 62:103-134.
32. Mars R.B., Neubert F.X., Noonan M.P., Sallet J., Toni I., Rushworth M.F. On the relationship between the "default mode network" and the "social brain". Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:189.
33. McCabe K., Houser D., Ryan L., Smith V., Trouard T. A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:11832-11835.
34. Miller L.E., Saygin A.P. Individual differences in the perception of biological motion: links to social cognition and motor imagery. Cognition 2013, 128:140-148.
35. Mitchell J.P. Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:262-271.
36. Mundy P., Neal R.A. Neural plasticity, joint attention, and a transactional social-orienting model of autism. Int. Rev. Res. Ment. Retard. 2000, 23:139-168.
37. Murray L., Trevarthen C. Emotional regulation of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers. Social Perception in Infancy 1985, 177-198. Ablex, Norwood, NJ. T.M. Field, N.A. Fox (Eds.).
38. Noordzij M.L., et al. Brain mechanisms underlying human communication. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2009, 3:14.
39. Nummenmaa L., Engell A.D., Von Dem Hagen E., Henson R.N., Calder A.J. Autism spectrum traits predict the neural response to eye gaze in typical individuals. NeuroImage 2012, 59:3356-3363.
40. Obleser J., Wise R.J., Dresner M.A., Scott S.K. Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2283-2289.
41. Okita S.Y., Bailenson J., Schwartz D.L. The mere belief of social interaction improves learning. The Proceedings of the 29th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2007, 1355-1360. D.S. McNamara, J.G. Trafton (Eds.).
42. Pelphrey K.A., Shultz S., Hudac C.M., Vander Wyk B.C. Research review: constraining heterogeneity: the social brain and its development in autism spectrum disorder. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2011, 52:631-644.
43. Pfeiffer U.J., et al. Why we interact: on the functional role of the striatum in the subjective experience of social interaction. NeuroImage 2014, 101:124-137.
44. Poljac E., Poljac E., Wagemans J. Reduced accuracy and sensitivity in the perception of emotional facial expressions in individuals with high autism spectrum traits. Autism 2013, 17:668-680.
45. Redcay E. The superior temporal sulcus performs a common function for social and speech perception: implications for the emergence of autism. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2008, 32:123-142.
46. Redcay E., et al. Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: a new tool for social cognitive neuroscience. NeuroImage 2010, 50:1639-1647.
47. Redcay E., Kleiner M., Saxe R. Look at this: the neural correlates of initiating and responding to bids for joint attention. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:169.
48. Redcay E., Dodell-Feder D., Mavros P.L., Kleiner M., Pearrow M.J., Triantafyllou C., Gabrieli J.D.E., Saxe R. Atypical brain activation patterns during a face-to-face joint attention game in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34:2511-2523.
49. Redcay E., Rice K., Saxe R. Interaction versus observation: a finer look at this distinction and its importance to autism. Behav. Brain Sci. 2013, 36:435.
50. Risko E.F., Laidlaw K.E., Freeth M., Foulsham T., Kingstone A. Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 6:143.
51. Schilbach L., Eickhoff S.B., Rotarska-Jagiela A., Fink G.R., Vogeley K. Minds at rest? Social cognition as the default mode of cognizing and its putative relationship to the "default system" of the brain. Conscious. Cogn. 2008, 17:457-467.
52. Schilbach L., et al. Minds made for sharing: initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:2702-2715.
53. Schilbach L., et al. Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behav. Brain Sci. 2013, 36:393-414.
54. Schneider D., Nott Z.E., Dux P.E. Task instructions and implicit theory of mind. Cognition 2014, 133:43-47.
55. Schneider D., Slaughter V.P., Becker S.I., Dux P.E. Implicit false-belief processing in the human brain. NeuroImage 2014, 101:268-275.
56. Scott S.K., Blank C.C., Rosen S., Wise R.J. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000, 123:2400-2406.
57. Sebanz N., Bekkering H., Knoblich G. Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 102:70-76.
58. Senju A., Southgate V., White S., Frith U. Mindblind eyes: an absence of spontaneous theory of mind in Asperger syndrome. Science 2009, 325:883-885.
59. Shintel H., Keysar B. Less is more: a minimalist account of joint action in communication. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2009, 12:260-273.
60. Speer L.L., Cook A.E., McMahon W.M., Clark E. Face processing in children with autism effects of stimulus contents and type. Autism 2007, 113:265-277.
61. Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition 1996, Blackwell, Oxford. second ed.
62. Spreng R.N., Mar R.A., Kim A.S. The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:489-510.
63. Stolk A., et al. Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111:18183-18188.
64. Teufel C., et al. Social cognition modulates the sensory coding of observed gaze direction. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1274-1277.
65. Tomasello M. Origins of Human Communication 2008, MIT Press, Cambridge.
66. Tomasello M., Carpenter M., Call J., Behne T., Moll H. Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 2005, 28:675-691.
67. Tottenham N., et al. The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Res. 2009, 168:242-249.
68. Young L., Cushman F., Hauser M., Saxe R. The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:8235-8240.