Trends and factors influencing inpatient prolapse surgical costs and length of stay in the United States

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 103-110

  Sanses, Tatiana V D ^a   Schiltz, Nicholas K ^b   Richter, Holly E ^c   Koroukian, Siran M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

inpatient hospital cost; length of stay; prolapse; surgical treatment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ANEMIA; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; CAUCASIAN; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ELECTROLYTE DISTURBANCE; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LOW VOLUME HOSPITAL; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; LUNG CIRCULATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICALLY UNINSURED; METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIS SURGERY; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; WEIGHT REDUCTION; COST; ECONOMICS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84960467086     PISSN: 21518378     EISSN: 21544212     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000225     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D, Women's Health Initiative. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 489-497
2. Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 712-716
3. Elliott CS, Rhoads KF, Comiter CV, Improving the accuracy of prolapse and incontinence procedure epidemiology by utilizing both inpatient and outpatient data. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24: 1939-1946
4. Subak LL, Waetjen LE, Van Den Eeden S, Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 646-651
5. Aplin B, Nazzal M, Qu W, Patient variables impacting hospital costs from 2008 to 2010. Am J Surg 2015; 210: 134-140
6. Cheon C, Maher C,. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24: 1873-1876
7. Maher CF, Connelly LB,. Cost minimization analysis of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and total vaginal mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 433.e1-433.e7
8. Patel M, O'Sullivan D, Tulikangas PK,. A comparison of costs for abdominal, laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacral colpopexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009; 20: 223-228
9. Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 1005-1013
10. Nygaard I, Chai TC, Cundiff GW, Summary of research recommendations from the Inaugural American Urogynecologic Society Research Summit. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2011; 17 (1): 4-7
11. Burwell SM,. Setting Value-Based Goals-HHS efforts to improve U.S. Health Care. Available at: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1500445. Accessed March 6, 2015
12. Introduction to the NIS 2011. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS-Introduction-2011.jsp. Accessed March 6, 2015
13. HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) comparison report 2007. Report # 2010-03. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2010-03.pdf. Accessed March 6, 2015
14. HCUP Cost-to-Charge Ratio Files. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). December 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/costtocharge.jsp. Accessed March 6, 2015
15. HCUP Comorbidity Software. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/comorbidity/comorbidity.jsp. Accessed March 6, 2015
16. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012
17. Singer JD,. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models and individual growth models. Journal of Behavioral and Education Statistics 1998; 23 (4): 323-355
18. Rogo-Gupta LJ, Lewin SN, Kim JH, The effect of surgeon volume on outcomes and resource use for vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (6): 1341-1347
19. Sung VW, Rogers ML, Myers DL, Impact of hospital and surgeon volumes on outcomes following pelvic reconstructive surgery in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (6): 1778-1783
20. Handa VL, Harvey L, Cundiff GW, Perioperative complications of surgery for genital prolapse: does concomitant anti-incontinence surgery increase complications? Urology 2005; 65: 483-487
21. Robinson BL, Parnell BA, Sandbulte JT, Robotic versus vaginal urogynecologic surgery: a retrospective cohort study of perioperative complications in elderly women. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2013; 19: 230-237