Understanding kidney transplant patients' treatment choices: The interaction of emotion with medical and social influences on risk preferences

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 155, Issue , 2016, Pages 43-50

  Harrington, Jean ^a,b   Morgan, Myfanwy ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomarker; Emotion; Gift exchange; Kidney transplantation; Risk; Social influences; Trust; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKER; DISEASE TREATMENT; DRUG PRESCRIBING; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH RISK; RESEARCH WORK; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EMOTION; FAMILY; FEMALE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; HUMAN; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE TREATMENT; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ASPECT; TRUST; UNITED KINGDOM; DECISION MAKING; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMAN RELATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84960439595     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.027     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Althaus C.E. A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk. Risk Anal. 2005, 25(3):567-588.
2. Beck U. Risk Society 1992, Sage, London.
3. Butler, et al. Modifiable risk factors for non-adherence to immunosuppressants in renal transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2004, 19(12):3144-3149.
4. Douglas M. No Free Gifts: Introduction to Mauss's Essay on the Gift. Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory: Collected Works 1992, vol. XII. Routledge, Oxon.
5. Durkheim E. The Rules of Sociological Method 1982, The Free Press, London.
6. Elder-Vass D. 'Free gifts and positional gifts: beyond exchangism'. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 2015, 18(4):451-468.
7. Giddens A. Risk and responsibility. Mod. Law Rev. 1999, 62(1).
8. Goldacre B. Bad Pharma. How Medicine Is Broken, and How We Can Fix it 2012, HarperCollins, London.
9. Hardwig J. What about the family. Hastings Cent. Rep. 1990, 20(2):5-10.
10. Heidt S., Wood K.J. Biomarkers of operational tolerance in solid organ transplantation. Expert Opin. Med. diagn. 2012, 6(4):281-293.
11. Howard R.J., et al. The changing causes of graft loss and death after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2002, 73(12):1923-1928.
12. Howell M., et al. Important outcomes for kidney transplant recipients: a nominal group and qualitative study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2012, 60(20):186-196.
13. Hyland R. Gifts: a study in comparative law 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Jackson J., Allum N., Gaskell G. Bridging levels of analysis in risk perception research: the case of the fear of crime. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 2006, 7(1).
15. Japp Klaus Peter Risiko 2000, Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld.
16. Lupton D. Risk and emotion: towards an alternative theoretical perspective. Health, Risk Soc. 2013, 15(8):634-647.
17. Lupton D., Tulloch J. 'Life would be pretty dull without risk': voluntary risk-taking and its pleasures. Health, Risk Soc. 2010, 4(2).
18. Lyng S. Edgework; a social psychological analysis of voluntary risk taking. Am. J. Sociol 1990, 95(4):851-886.
19. Mason J. Personal narratives, relational selves: residential histories in the living and telling. Sociol. Rev. 2004, 52(2):162-179.
20. Mauss M. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies 1954, Routledge, London.
21. McDaniel S.R., Zuckermann M. Comprehensive Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology 2003, Wiley, New Jersey.
22. NHSa - National Health Service Kidney Transplant Risks 2015, http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Kidney-transplant/Pages/Risks.aspx.
23. NHSb - National Health Service Dialysis 2015, http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Dialysis/Pages/Introduction.aspx.
24. Nelkin D., Andrews L. Homo economics: commercialization of body tissue in the age of biotechnology. Hastings Cent. Rep. 1998, 28(5):30-39.
25. OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2011, http://www.oecd.org/health/biotech/49023036.pdf.
26. The Risks of Medical Innovation: Risk Perception and Assessment in Historical Context, Routledge Studies in the Social History of Medicine 2006, Routledge, Abingdon. T. Schlich, U. Tröhler (Eds.).
27. Slovic P., et al. The affect heuristic. Eur. J. Operational Res. 2007, 177(3):1333-1352.
28. Slovic P., Västfjäll D. Affect, moral intuition, and risk. Psychol. Inq. 2010, 21(4):387-398.
29. Taussig M.T. Reification and the consciousness of the patient. Soc. Sci. Med. 1980, 14(B):3-13.
30. Tulloch J., Lupton D. Risk and Everyday Life 2003, Sage Publications, London.
31. Verkerk M.A., Lindemann H., McLaughlin J., Leach Scully J., Kihlbom U., Nelson J., Chin J. Where families and healthcare meet. J. Med. Ethics 2013, 41(2):183-185.
32. Wasserfallen, et al. Quality of life on chronic dialysis: comparison between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2004, 19:1594-1599.
33. Wasserman J.A., Hinote B.P. Chronic illness as incalculable risk: scientific uncertainty and social transformations in medicine. Soc. Theory Health 2010, 9:41-58.
34. Welsh E. Dealing with data: using NVivo in the qualitative data analysis process. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 2002, 3(2).
35. Zinn J.O. Recent developments in sociology of risk and uncertainty. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 2006, 7(1):30.
36. Zinn J.O. Heading into the unknown: everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty. Health Risk Soc. 2008, 10(5):439-450.
37. Zinn J.O. Towards a better understanding of risk-taking: key concepts, dimensions and perspectives. Health, Risk Soc. 2015, 17(2):99-114.