Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC

Clinical Trials

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 214-222

  Coronado, Gloria D ^a   Retecki, Sally ^a   Schneider, Jennifer ^a   Taplin, Stephen H ^b   Burdick, Tim ^c,d   Green, Beverly B ^e  

^a CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinic recruitment; colorectal cancer screening; federally qualified health centers; pragmatic trial; safety net clinics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COLON CANCER; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CENTER; HISPANIC; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAID; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTROLLED STUDY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AGED; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION;

EID: 84960412595     PISSN: 17407745     EISSN: 17407753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1740774515608122     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE,. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health 2013; 103: e38-e46.
2. NIH Common Fund National Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory. http://commonfund.nih.gov/hcscollaboratory/index (2013,. accessed 3 November 2014).
3. Coronado GD, Vollmer WM, Petrik AF, et al. Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer 2014; 14: 55.
4. Inadomi JM, Vijan S, Janz NK, et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 575-582.
5. Gupta S, Halm EA, Rockey DC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 1725-1732.
6. Vart G, Banzi R, Minozzi S,. Comparing participation rates between immunochemical and guaiac faecal occult blood tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2012; 55: 87-92.
7. Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, et al. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns 2001; 44: 119-127.
8. Coronado GD, Sanchez J, Petrik A, et al. Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. J Cancer Educ 2014; 29: 86-90.
9. US Department of Health and Human Services 2013 Health Center Data-National Program Grantee Data. http://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx?year=2013 (2015,. accessed 22 May 2015).
10. Yawn BP, Dietrich A, Graham D, et al. Preventing the voltage drop: keeping practice-based research network (PBRN) practices engaged in studies. J Am Board Fam Med 2014; 27: 123-135.
11. Kreindler SA, Larson BK, Wu FM, et al. The rules of engagement: physician engagement strategies in intergroup contexts. J Health Organ Manag 2014; 28: 41-61.
12. Murray DM, Katz ML, Post DM, et al. Enhancing cancer screening in primary care: rationale, design, analysis plan, and recruitment results. Contemp Clin Trials 2013; 34: 356-363.
13. Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Sox CH, et al. Cancer early-detection services in community health centers for the underserved. A randomized controlled trial. Arch Fam Med 1998; 7: 320-327.