Development of a clinical prediction rule to improve peripheral intravenous cannulae first attempt success in the emergency department and reduce post insertion failure rates: The vascular access decisions in the emergency room (VADER) study protocol

BMJ Open

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Carr, Peter J ^a,b   Rippey, James C R ^a,c   Cooke, Marie L ^b   Bharat, Chrianna ^a   Murray, Kevin ^a   Higgins, Niall S ^b   Foale, Aileen ^a   Rickard, Claire M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTENT VALIDITY; DEVICE FAILURE; DEVICE MAINTENANCE; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY WARD; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CANNULA; PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; POST INSERTION FAILURE; PREDICTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; VASCULAR ACCESS; WARD; CATHETERIZATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HOSPITAL EMERGENCY SERVICE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; COHORT STUDIES; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HUMANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 84960399047     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009196     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Fernandez-Ruiz M, Carretero A, Diaz D, et al. Hospital-wide survey of the adequacy in the number of vascular catheters and catheter lumens. J Hosp Med 2014;9:35-41.
2. Fields JM, Piela NE, Au AK, et al. Risk factors associated with difficult venous access in adult ED patients. Am J Emerg Med 2014;32:1179-82.
3. Sebbane M, Claret PG, Lefebvre S, et al. Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility. J Emerg Med 2013;44:299-305.
4. Wallis MC, McGrail M, Webster J, et al. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:63-8.
5. Dargin JM, Rebholz CM, Lowenstein RA, et al. Ultrasonographyguided peripheral intravenous catheter survival in ED patients with difficult access. Am J Emerg Med 2010;28:1-7.
6. Carr PJ, Rippey JA, Budgeon CA, et al. Insertion of peripheral intravenous cannulae in the emergency department: factors associated with first-time insertion success. J Vasc Access 2015. doi:10.5301/jva.5000487. [Epub ahead of print 4 Dec. 2015]
7. Limm EI, Fang X, Dendle C, et al. Half of all peripheral intravenous lines in an Australian tertiary emergency department are unused: pain with no gain? Ann Emerg Med 2013;62:521-5.
8. Tuffaha HW, Rickard CM, Inwood S, et al. The epic3 recommendation that clinically indicated replacement of peripheral venous catheters is safe and cost-saving: how much would the NHS save? J Hosp Infect 2014;87:183-4.
9. Cuper NJ, de Graaff JC, van Dijk ATH, et al. Predictive factors for difficult intravenous cannulation in pediatric patients at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Paediatr Anaesth 2012;22:223-9.
10. Jacobson AF, Winslow EH. Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. Heart Lung 2005;34:345-59.
11. Jacobson AF. Intradermal normal saline solution, self-selected music, and insertion difficulty effects on intravenous insertion pain. Heart Lung 1999;28:114-22.
12. Lapostolle F, Catineau J, Garrigue B, et al. Prospective evaluation of peripheral venous access difficulty in emergency care. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:1452-7.
13. O'Neill MB, Dillane M, Hanipah NFA. Validating the difficult intravenous access clinical prediction rule. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012;28:1314-16.
14. Riker MW, Kennedy C, Winfrey BS, et al. Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:1129-34.
15. Witting MD. IV access difficulty: incidence and delays in an urban emergency department. J Emerg Med 2012;42:483-7.
16. Yen K, Riegert A, Gorelick MH. Derivation of the DIVA score: a clinical prediction rule for the identification of children with difficult intravenous access. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008;24:143-7.
17. Carr PJ, Higgins NS, Cooke ML, et al. Vascular access specialist teams for device insertion and prevention of failure. Cochrane Libr. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014.
18. Dougherty L. Intravenous therapy in older patients. Nurs Stand 2014;28:50-8.
19. Au AK, Rotte MJ, Grzybowski RJ, et al. Decrease in central venous catheter placement due to use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral intravenous catheters. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1950-4.
20. Bauman M, Braude D, Crandall C. Ultrasound-guidance vs. standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ED technicians. Am J Emerg Med 2009;27:135-40.
21. Brannam L, Blaivas M, Lyon M, et al. Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:1361-3.
22. Chinnock B, Thornton S, Hendey GW, et al. Predictors of success in nurse-performed ultrasound-guided cannulation. J Emerg Med 2007;33:401-5.
23. Costantino TG, Kirtz JF, Satz WA. Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access vs. the external jugular vein as the initial approach to the patient with difficult vascular access. J Emerg Med 2010;39:462-7.
24. Fields MJ, Dean AJ, Todman RW, et al. The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1134-40.
25. Juvin P, Blarel A, Bruno F, et al. Is peripheral line placement more difficult in obese than in lean patients? Anesth Analg 2003;96:1218, table of contents.
26. Keyes LE, Frazee BW, Snoey ER, et al. Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:711-14.
27. Panebianco NL, Fredette JM, Szyld D, et al. What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:1298-303.
28. Schoenfeld E, Boniface K, Shokoohi H. ED technicians can successfully place ultrasound-guided intravenous catheters in patients with poor vascular access. Am J Emerg Med 2011;29:496-501.
29. de la Torre-Montero J-C, Montealegre-Sanz M, Faraldo-Cabana A, et al. Venous International Assessment, VIA scale, validated classification procedure for the peripheral venous system. J Vasc Access 2014;15:45-50.
30. Fields MJ, Piela NE, Ku BS. Association between multiple IV attempts and perceived pain levels in the emergency department. J Vasc Access 2014;15:514-18.
31. de Negri DC, Avelar AFM, Andreoni S, et al. Predisposing factors for peripheral intravenous puncture failure in children. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2012;20:1072-80.
32. Bensghir M, Chkoura K, Mounir K, et al. Peripheral intravenous access in the operating room: characteristics and predictors of difficulty. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2012;31:600-4.
33. Jenkins K. II. Needle phobia: a psychological perspective. Br J Anaesth 2014;113:4-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24574504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu013
34. Aulagnier J, Hoc C, Mathieu E, et al. Efficacy of AccuVein to facilitate peripheral intravenous placement in adults presenting to an emergency department: a randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med 2014;21:858-63.
35. Frey AM. Success rates for peripheral iv insertion in a children's hospital. Financial implications. J Intraven Nurs 1998;21:160-5.
36. Costantino TG, Parikh AK, Satz WA, et al. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46:456-61.
37. Elia F, Ferrari G, Molino P, et al. Standard-length catheters vs long catheters in ultrasound-guided peripheral vein cannulation. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:712-16.
38. Mills CN, Liebmann O, Stone MB, et al. Ultrasonographically guided insertion of a 15-cm catheter into the deep brachial or basilic vein in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50:68-72.
39. Resnick JR, Cydulka RK, Donato J, et al. Success of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access with skin marking. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:723-30.
40. Stein J, George B, River G, et al. Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access: a randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54:33-40.
41. van der Woude OCP, Cuper NJ, Getrouw C, et al. The effectiveness of a near-infrared vascular imaging device to support intravenous cannulation in children with dark skin color: a cluster randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg 2013;116:1266-71.
42. Moureau NL, Trick N, Nifong T, et al. Vessel health and preservation (Part 1): a new evidence-based approach to vascular access selection and management. J Vasc Access 2012;13:351-6.
43. Cicolini G, Bonghi AP, Di Labio L, et al. Position of peripheral venous cannulae and the incidence of thrombophlebitis: an observational study. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:1268-73.
44. Do Rego Furtado LC. Maintenance of peripheral venous access and its impact on the development of phlebitis: a survey of 186 catheters in a general surgery department in Portugal. J Infus Nurs 2011;34:382-90.
45. Easterlow D, Hoddinott P, Harrison S. Implementing and standardising the use of peripheral vascular access devices. J Clin Nurs 2010;19:721-7.
46. González López JL, Arribi Vilela A, Fernández del Palacio E. Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomized study. J Hosp Infect 2014;86:117-26.
47. Carr PJ, Glynn RW, Dineen B, et al. A pilot intravenous cannulation team: an Irish perspective. Br J Nurs 2010;19(Suppl 10):S19-27.
48. Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ, et al, UK Department of Health. epic 3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect 2014;86(Suppl 1):S1-70.
49. Stuart RL, Cameron DR, Scott C, et al. Peripheral intravenous catheter-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: more than 5 years of prospective data from two tertiary health services. Med J Aust 2013;198:551-3.
50. Trinh TT, Chan PA, Edwards O, et al. Peripheral venous catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:579-83.
51. Zingg W, Pittet D. Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009;34(Suppl 4):S38-42.
52. Khadim MF, Leonard D, Moorehead RA, et al. Back to basics: iatrogenic intravenous cannula embolus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013;95:110-11.
53. Pujol M, Hornero A, Saballs M, et al. Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections at a university-affiliated hospital. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:22-9.
54. Walsh G. Difficult peripheral venous access: recognizing and managing the patient at risk. JAVA 2008;13:198-203.
55. Stevens RJG, Mahadevan V, Moss ALH. Injury to the lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm after venous cannulation: a case report and literature review. Clin Anat 2012;25:659-62.
56. Barton AJ, Danek G, Johns P, et al. Improving patient outcomes through CQI: vascular access planning. J Nurs Care Qual 1998;13:77-85.
57. Ryan TP. Sample size determination and power. NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
58. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1373-9.
59. Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:710-18.
60. Steyerberg EW. Clinical prediction models. New York: Springer, 2009.
61. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006;29(5):489-97.
62. Marsh N, Mihala G, Ray-Barruel G, et al. Inter-rater agreement on PIVC-associated phlebitis signs, symptoms and scales. J Eval Clin Pract 2015;21:893-9.
63. Webster J, Morris H-L, Robinson K, et al. Development and validation of a Vein Assessment Tool (VAT). Aust J Adv Nurs 2007;24:5-7.
64. Alexandrou E, Ray-Barruel G, Carr PJ, et al. International prevalence of the use of peripheral intravenous catheters. J Hosp Med 2015;10:530-3.
65. Doniger SJ, Ishimine P, Fox JC, et al. Randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement versus traditional techniques in difficult-access pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2009;25:154-9.
66. Darvish AH, Shroff SD, Mostofi MB, et al. Single-operator ultrasound-guided IV placement by emergency nurses. J Emerg Med 2011;41:211-12.
67. Mbamalu D, Banerjee A. Methods of obtaining peripheral venous access in difficult situations. Postgrad Med J 1999;75:459-62.
68. Adams ST, Leveson SH. Clinical prediction rules. BMJ 2012;344:d8312.
69. Tuffaha HW, Rickard CM, Webster J, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinically indicated versus routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters. Appl Heal Econ Heal Policy 2014;12:51-8.
70. Lee WL, Chen HL, Tsai TY, et al. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective study of 3165 patients. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:683-6.