The value of vegetation cover for ecosystem services in the suburban context

Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

Volumn 16, Issue , 2016, Pages 110-122

  de la Barrera, Francisco ^a   Rubio, Patricio ^b,c   Banzhaf, Ellen ^d  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

^d HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Land use change; Metropolitan Area of Santiago de Chile (MAS); Remote sensing techniques; Structural landscape analysis; Urbanization processes; Vegetation index

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; CLIMATE CONDITIONS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GREENSPACE; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MICROCLIMATE; NEIGHBORHOOD; RAINWATER; REMOTE SENSING; RUNOFF; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SUBURBAN AREA; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBANIZATION; VEGETATION COVER; VEGETATION INDEX;

CHILE; METROPOLITANA; SANTIAGO [METROPOLITANA];

EID: 84960349362     PISSN: 16188667     EISSN: 16108167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ADIMARK, 2004. Mapa socioeconómico de Chile. Nivel socioeconómico de los hogares del país basado en datos del Censo 2002. [online] URL: http://www.adimark.cl/medios/estudios/Mapa_Socioeconomico_de_Chile.pdf.
2. Alberti M., Marzluff J.M. Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosyst. 2004, 7(3):241-265.
3. Andersson E. Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11(1):34. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art34/.
4. Arnold C., Gibbons J. Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 1996, 62:243-258.
5. Asgarzadeh M., Vahdati K., Lotfi M., Arab M., Babaei A., Naderi F., Soufie M.P., Rouhani G. Plant selection method for urban landscapes of semi-arid cities (a case study of Tehran). Urban For. Urban Green. 2014, 13(3):450-458.
6. Banzhaf E., Reyes-Paecke S., Müller A., Kindler A. Do demographic and land-use changes contrast urban and suburban dynamics? A sophisticated reflection on Santiago de Chile. Habitat Int. 2013, 39:179-191.
7. Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems. Building Resilience for Complexity and Change 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Breuste J., Niemelä J., Snep R.P.H. Applying landscape ecological principles in urban environments. Landsc. Ecol. 2008, 23:1139-1142.
9. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:17-29.
10. Borsdorf A., Hidalgo R., Sanchez R. A new model of urban development in Latin America: the gated communities and fenced cities in the metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valparaíso. Cities 2007, 24(5):365-378.
11. Cadenasso M., Pickett S., Schwarz K. Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: Reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:80-88.
12. Cohen M., Baudoin R., Palibrk M., Persyn N., Rhein C. Urban biodiversity and social inequalities in built-up cities: new evidences, next questions. The example of Paris, France. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2012, 106:277-287.
13. De la Barrera F. La transformación del paisaje rural-urbano y su efecto sobre los servicios ecosistémicos en una microcuenca de Santiago de Chile 2012, (Doctoral thesis), Universitat de Barcelona, 427 pp.
14. De Ramón A. Santiago de Chile (1541-1991): Historia de una sociedad urbana 1992, Editorial MAPFRE, Madrid.
15. Ducci M. Área urbana de Santiago 1991-2000: expansión de la industria y la vivienda. EURE 2002, 28(85):187-207.
16. Escobedo F., Nowak D. Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2009, 90:102-110.
17. Escobedo F., Wagner J., Nowak D.J., De la Maza C., Rodriguez M., Crane D.E. Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile's policy of using urban forests to improve air quality. J. Environ. Manage. 2008, 86:148-157.
18. Farina A. Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology 2007, Springer, Netherlands.
19. Fuentes E., Espinoza G., Fuenzalida I. Cambios vegetacionales recientes y percepción ambiental: El caso de Santiago de Chile. Rev. Geogra. Norte Grande 1984, 11:45-53.
20. Fuentes E.R., Avilés R., Segura A. Landscape change under indirect effects of human use: the Savanna of Central Chile. Landsc. Ecol. 1989, 2(2):73-80.
21. Groffman P.M., Cavender-Bares J., Bettez N.D., Grove J.M., Hall S.J., Heffernan J.B., Hobbie S.E., Larson K.L., Morse J.L., Neill C., Nelson K., O'Neil-Dunne J., Ogden L., Pataki D.E., Polsky C., Chowdhury R.R., Steele M.K. Ecological homogenization of urban USA. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 12(1):74-81.
22. Heinrichs D., Henning N., Rodriguez C. Dispersión urbana y nuevos desafíos para la gobernanza (metropolitana) en América Latina: el caso de Santiago de Chile. EURE (Santiago) 2009, 104(35):29-46. http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0250-71612009000100002&lng=en&nrm=iso.
23. Hernández, J., 2008. La situación del arbolado urbano en Santiago. Revista de Urbanismo 18. Santiago de Chile. http://revistaurbanismo.uchile.cl/CDA/urb_completa/0,1313,ISID%253D734%2526IDG%253D2%2526ACT%253D1%2526PRT%253D21177,00.html.
24. Holmgren M. Exotic herbivores as drivers of plant invasion and switch to ecosystem alternative states. Biol. Invasions 2002, 4:25-33.
25. Kabisch S., Heinrichs D., Krellenberg K., Welz J., Rodríguez Vignoli J., Sabatini F., Rasse A. Socio-spatial differentiation: drivers, risks and opportunities. Risk Habitat Megacity 2012, 155-181. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. D. Heinrichs, K. Krellenberg, B. Hansjürgens, F. Martínez (Eds.).
26. Kindler A., Banzhaf E., Ebert A., Weiland U., Reyes S. Thematic field: land use management and flood risk prevention. How Sustainable is Santiago de Chile? Current Performance - Future Trends - Potential Measures. Synthesis report of the Risk Habitat Megacity research initiative (2007-2011). UFZ Report 4/2010 2010, 16-18. K. Krellenberg, J. Kopfmüller, J. Barton (Eds.).
27. Looser G. La importancia del algarrobo (Prosopis chilensis) en la vegetación de la provincia de Santiago, Chile. Rev. Univ. 1962, 47:104-116. http://www.chlorischile.cl/algarrobo-looser/LA%20IMPORTANCIA%20DEL%20ALGARROBO.htm.
28. Marcucci D. Landscape history as a planning tool. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2000, 49:67-81.
29. McDonnell M., Pickett S., Groffman P., Bohlen P., Pouyat R., Zipperer W., Parmelee R., Carreiro M., Medley K. Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst. 1997, 1(1):21-36.
30. Ministerio de Desarrollo Social Encuesta de Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional (CASEN) 2009.
31. Moreno M. Intensity and form of the urban heat island in Barcelona. Int. J. Climatol. 1994, 14:705-710.
32. Moreno M. Climatología urbana 1999, Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona.
33. Müller A., Reiter J., Weiland U. Assessment of urban vulnerability towards floods using an indicator-based approach - a case study for Santiago de Chile. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 11:2107-2123.
34. Müller F., de Groot R., Willemen L. Ecosystem Services at the Landscape Scale: the Need for Integrative Approaches. Landsc. Online 2010, 23:1-11.
35. Myers N., Mittermeir R., Mittermeir C.G., Da Fonseca G.A., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
36. Nowak D., Crane D. The urban forest effects (UFORE) model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions. Proceedings: Integrated Tools for Natural Resources Inventories in the 21st Century 2000, 714-720. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN. M. Hansen, T. Burk (Eds.).
37. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center (ORNL DAAC). 2011. MODIS subsetted land products, Collection 5. http://daac.ornl.gov/MODIS/modis.html.
38. Pauleit S., Duhme F. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2000, 52:1-20.
39. Pauleit S., Jones N., Nyhuus S., Pirnat J., Salbitano F., Konijnendijk C., Nilsson K., Randrup T., Schipperijn J. Urban forest resources in European cities. Urban Forests and Trees 2005, 49-80. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. C. Konijnendijk, K. Nilssin, T. Randrup, J. Schipperijn (Eds.).
40. Pavez E., Lobos G., Jaksic F. Cambios de largo plazo en el paisaje y los ensambles de micromamíferos y rapaces en Chile. Rev. Chilena Hist. Nat. 2010, 83:99-111.
41. Pedlowski M., Andrade V., Jasmim J., Heynen N. Urban forest and environmental inequality in Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Urban Ecosyst. 2002, 6:9-20.
42. Peña M. Relationships between remotely sensed surface parameters associated with the urban heat sink formation in Santiago, Chile. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29:4385-4404.
43. Pickett S.T.A., Cadenasso M.L., Grove J.M., Groffman P.M., Band L.E., Boone C.G., Burch W.R., Grimmond C.S.B., Holm J., Jenkins J.C., Law N.L., Nilon C.H., Pouyat R.V., Szlavecz K., Warren P.S., Wilson M.A. Beyond urban legends: an emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore ecosystem study. BioScience 2008, 58:139-150.
44. Potter C.S., Brooks V. Global analysis of empirical relations between annual climate and seasonality of NDVI. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1998, 19(15):2921-2948.
45. Roloff A., Korn S., Gillner S. The climate-species-matrix to select tree species for urban habitats considering climate change. Urban For. Urban Green. 2009, 8(4):295-308.
46. Romero H., Fuentes C., Smith P. Ecología política de los riesgos naturales y de la contaminación ambiental en Santiago de Chile: Necesidad de justicia ambiental, Scripta Nova. Rev. Electrón. Geogr. Ciencias Soc. 2010, 331(52). http://www.ub.es/geocrit/sn/sn-331/sn-331-52.htm.
47. Romero H., Ihl M., Rivera A., Zalazar P., Azócar P. Rapid urban growth, land-use changes and air pollution in Santiago, Chile. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33:4039-4047.
48. Romero H., Vásquez A. Evaluación ambiental del proceso de urbanización de las cuencas del piedemonte andino de Santiago de Chile. Rev. EURE 2005, 94:97-117.
49. Sarricolea P., Aliste E., Castro P., Escobedo C. Análisis de la máxima intensidad de la isla de calor urbana nocturna de la ciudad de Rancagua (Chile) y sus factores explicativos. Rev. Climatol. 2008, 8:71-84.
50. Schulz J.J., Cayuela L., Echeverria C., Salas J., Rey Benayas J.M. Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of central Chile (1975-2008). Appl. Geogr. 2010, 30:436-447.
51. Seguel R., Morales R., Leiva M. Ozone weekend effect in Santiago, Chile. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 162:72-79.
52. Seppelt R., Dormann C.F., Eppink F.V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:630-636.
53. Tyrväinen L., Pauleit S., Seeland K., de Vries S. Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees. Urban Forests and Trees 2005, 81-114. Springer, Berlin. C.C. Konijnendijk, K. Nilsson, T.B. Randrup, J. Schipperijn (Eds.).
54. Vasquez A., Salgado M. Desigualdades socioeconómicas y distribución inequitativa de los riesgos ambientales en las comunas de Peñalolén y San Pedro de la Paz: Una perspectiva de justicia ambiental. Rev. Geogra. Norte Grande 2009, 43:95-110. http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-34022009000200006&lng=es&nrm=iso.
55. Vidal R. Reconfiguración de la periferia del Gran Santiago: previsión de las nuevas tendencias observadas. Rev. Geogra. Norte Grande 2002, 29:39-55.
56. Weiland U., Kindler A., Banzhaf E., Ebert A., Reyes-Paecke S. Indicators for sustainable land use management in Santiago de Chile. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11:1074-1083.
57. Whitford V., Ennos A., Handley J. City form and natural process: Indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2001, 57:91-103.