Absolute order-of-magnitude reasoning applied to a social multi-criteria evaluation framework

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 28, Issue 1-2, 2016, Pages 261-274

  Afsordegan, A ^a   Sanchez M ^a   Agell, N ^b   Aguado, J C ^a   Gamboa, G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b ESADE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Absolute order of magnitude; energy planning; linguistic labels; multi criteria decision analysis; qualitative reasoning; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CASE BASED REASONING; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; LINGUISTICS; WIND POWER;

ABSOLUTE ORDER-OF-MAGNITUDE; ENERGY PLANNING; LINGUISTIC LABELS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE REASONING; TOPSIS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84960244083     PISSN: 0952813X     EISSN: 13623079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0952813X.2015.1024489     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Agell, N., Sánchez, M., Prats, F., Roselló, L. (2012). Ranking multi-attribute alternatives on the basis of linguistic labels in group decisions. Information Sciences, 209, 49-60.
2. Aras, H., Erdoʇmų, S., Koç, E. (2004). Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process. Renewable Energy, 29, 1383-1392.
3. Cables, E., Garciá-Cascales, M. S., Lamata, M. T. (2012). The LTOPSIS: An alternative to TOPSIS decision-making approach for linguistic variables. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 2119-2126.
4. Catalina, T., Virgone, J., Blanco, E. (2011). Multi-source energy systems analysis using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology. Renewable Energy, 36, 2245-2252.
5. Chang, N. B., Parvathinathan, G., Breeden, J. B. (2008). Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region. Journal of environmental management, 87, 139-153.
6. Cherubini, F., Strømman, A. H. (2011). Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresource Technology, 102, 437-451.
7. Dai, J., Qi, J., Chi, J., Chen, S., Yang, J., Ju, L., Chen, B. (2010). Integrated water resource security evaluation of Beijing based on GRA and TOPSIS. Frontiers of Earth Science in China, 4, 357-362.
8. Doukas, H., Karakosta, C., Psarras, J. (2010). Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 5491-5497.
9. Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Academic press.
10. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. New York, NY: Springer.
11. Forbus, K. D. (1984). Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 85-168.
12. Gamboa, G., Munda, G. (2007). The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework. Energy Policy, 35, 1564-1583.
13. Goumas, M., Lygerou, V. (2000). An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 606-613.
14. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2000). Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115, 67-82.
15. Hsieh, T.-Y., Lu, S.-T., Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 573-584.
16. Hwang, C.-L., Yoon, K. (1992). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 374. Springer-Verlag.
17. Jing, Y.-Y., Bai, H., Wang, J.-J. (2012). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for CCHP systems driven by different energy sources. Energy Policy, 42, 286-296.
18. Kahraman, C. (2008). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: Theory and applications with recent developments. In Cengiz Kahraman (Ed.), Springer Optimization and its Applications (Vol. 16). Springer.
19. Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Kaya, I. (2010). Selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design: The case of Turkey. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 16, 82-102.
20. Lee, A. H., Chen, H. H., Kang, H.-Y. (2009). Multi-criteria decision making on strategic selection of wind farms. Renewable Energy, 34, 120-126.
21. Liu, KFR. (2007). Evaluating environmental sustainability: an integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic. Environmental management, 39, 721-736.
22. Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54-65.
23. Munda, G. (2004). Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 662-677.
24. Munda, G. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 78, 953-986.
25. Nieto-Morote, A., Ruz-vila, F., Canovas-rodriguez, F. (2010). Selection of a trigeneration system using a fuzzy AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach. International Journal of Energy research, 35, 781-794.
26. Pohekar, S., Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planningA review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8, 365-381.
27. Polatidis, H., Haralambopoulos, D., Munda, G., Vreeker, R. (2006). Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1, 181-193.
28. Roy, B., Slowiński, R. (2013). Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 1, 69-97.
29. San Cristóbal, J. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in spain: The Vikor method. Renewable Energy, 36, 498-502.
30. San Cristóbal, J. (2012). A goal programming model for the optimal mix and location of renewable energy plants in the north of Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 4461-4464.
31. Tapia Garciá, J., del Moral, M., Martínez, M., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2012). A consensus model for group decision making problems with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10022-10030.
32. Travé-Massuyès, L., Prats, F., Sánchez, M., Agell, N. (2005). Relative and absolute order-of-magnitude models unified. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 45, 323-341.
33. Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., Shi, G.-H., Zhang, X.-T. (2008). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system. Energy Policy, 36, 3823-3832.
34. Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., Zhao, J.-H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 2263-2278.
35. Wolsink, M. (2010). Near-shore wind powerProtected seascapes, environmentalists attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective. Land Use Policy, 27, 195-203.
36. Yeh, T.-M., Huang, Y.-L. (2014). Factors in determining wind farm location: Integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP. Renewable Energy, 66, 159-169.
37. Young, H., Levenglick, A. (1978). A consistent extension of Condorcet's election principle. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 35, 285-300.
38. Zadeh, L. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 8, 199-249.