Defining and measuring results of workplace behavior

Handbook of Employee Selection

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 513-529

  Pulakos, Elaine D ^a   O’ Leary, Ryan S ^a  

^a PDRI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960241001     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809808     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Banks, C. G., & May, K. E. (1999). Performance management: The real glue in organizations. In A. I. Kraut & A K. Korman (Eds.), Evolving practices in human resource management (pp 118-145). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A metaanalysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
3. Bernardin, H. J., & Buckley, M. R. (1981). Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review, 6, 205-213.
4. Bernardin, H. J., Hagan, C. M., Kane, J. S., & Villanova, P. (1998). Effective performance management: A focus on precision, customers, and situational constraints. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp 3-48). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Borman, W. C. (1987). Behavior-based rating scales. In R. A. Berk (Ed.). Performance assessment: Methods and application. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Borman, W. C. (1991). Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 271-326). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
7. Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168-177.
8. Brentz, R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18, 321-352.
9. Cardy, R. L. (1998). Performance appraisal in a quality context: A new look at old problems. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp 132-162). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Cardy, R. L., & Dobbins, G. H. (1994). Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
11. Cascio, W. F. (1998). Applied psychology in human resource management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Dipboye, R. L., & de Pontbraind, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248-251.
13. Dunnette, M. D. (1966). Personnel selection and placement. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14. Feldman, D. (1992). The case for non-analytic performance appraisal. Human Resources Management Review, 2, 9-35.
15. Graves, J. P. (1986). Let’s put appraisal back in performance appraisal: Part 1. Personnel Journal, 61, 844-849.
16. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinates of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of applied psychology, 71, 340-342.
17. Guion, R. M. (1965). Personnel testing. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill.
18. Hillgren, J. S., & Cheatham, D. W. (2000). Understanding performance measures: An approach to linking rewards to the achievement of organizational objectives. Scottsdale, AZ: WorldatWork.
19. Hough, L. M. (1992). The “Big Five” personality variables—Construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
20. Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization for 12,000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Service.
21. Jamieson, B. D. (1973). Behavioral problems with management by objective. Academy of Management Review, 16, 496-505.
22. Kane, J. S. (1986). Performance distribution assessment. In R. A. Berk (Ed.), Performance assessment: Methods and applications (pp 237-274). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. Landy, F. J., & Trumbo, D. A. (1980). The psychology of work behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
24. Latham, G. P. (1986). Job performance and appraisal. In C. L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 117-155). New York, NY: Wiley.
25. Lawler, E. E. (1994). Performance management: The next generation. Compensation and Benefits Review, 26, 16-20.
26. Levinson, H. (2005). Management by whose objectives? In Harvard Business Review on Appraising Employee Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
27. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance, 19691980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
29. Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480.
30. Muczyk, J. P. (1979). Dynamics and hazards of MBO application. Personnel Administrator, 24, 51-61.
31. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
32. Olian, R. L., & Rynes, S. L. (1991). Making total quality work: Aligning organizational processes, performance measures, and stakeholders. Human Resources Management, 30, 303-330.
33. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513-563.
34. Pulakos, E. D. (2004). Performance management. A roadmap for developing, implementing, and evaluating performance management systems. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resources Management.
35. Pulakos. E. D. (2008). Performance management: How you can achieve important business results. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
36. Pulakos, E. D., Hanson, R. A., & O’Leary, R. S. (2007). Performance management in the United States. In A. Varma, P. Budhwar, & A. DeNisi (Eds), Global performance management. London, England: Routledge.
37. Rodgers, R., & Hunter, J. E. (1991). Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 322-336.
38. Rodgers, R., Hunter, J. E., & Rogers, D. L. (1993). Influence of top management commitment on management process success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 151-155.
39. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
40. Schneier, C. E., Shaw, D. G., & Beatty, R. W. (1991). Performance measurement and management: A tool for strategy execution. Human Resource Management, 30, 279-301.
41. Smith, P. C. (1976). Behaviors, results, and organizational effectiveness: The problem of criteria. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 239-287). Chicago, IL: Rand Mc Nally.
42. Strauss, G. (1972). Management by objectives: A critical review. Training and Development Journal, 26, 10-15.