Graph-Sparse LDA: A topic model with structured sparsity

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 4, Issue , 2015, Pages 2575-2581

  Doshi Velez, Finale ^a   Wallace, Byron C ^b   Adams, Ryan ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

HIERARCHICAL TOPIC MODELS; HIGH DIMENSIONALITY; LATENT STRUCTURES; PREDICTION PERFORMANCE; SPARSE TECHNIQUES; STATE OF THE ART; STRUCTURED SPARSITIES; UNDERLYING GRAPHS;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 84960156699     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Abney, S., and Light, M. 1999. Hiding a semantic hierarchy in a Markov model. In Workshop on Unsupervised Learning in Natural Language Processing, 1-8.
2. Anandkumar, A.; Ge, R.; Hsu, D.; Kakade, S. M.; and Telgarsky, M. 2012. Tensor decompositions for learning latent variable models, http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7559.
3. Andrzejewski, D.; Zhu, X.; and Craven, M. 2009. Incorporating domain knowledge into topic modeling via Dirichlet forest priors. In ICML, 25-32.
4. Archambeau, C.; Lakshminarayanan, B.; and Bouchard, G. 2011. Latent IBP compound Dirichlet allocation. In NIPS Bayesian Nonparametrics Workshop.
5. Blei, D. M.; Griffiths, T. L.; and Jordan, M. I. 2010. The nested Chinese restaurant process and Bayesian nonparametric inference of topic hierarchies. Journal of the ACM 57(2):7:1-7:30.
6. Blei, D. M.; Ng, A. Y.; and Jordan, M. I. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3:993-1022.
7. Bodenreider, O. 2004. The unified medical language system (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic acids research 32:D267-D270.
8. Boyd-Graber, J. L.; Blei, D. M.; and Zhu, X. 2007. A topic model for word sense disambiguation. In EMNLP-CoNLL, 1024-1033.
9. Chang, J.; Boyd-Graber, J. L.; Gerrish, S.; Wang, C.; and Blei, D. M. 2009. Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In NIPS, 288-296.
10. Chen, H.; Dunson, D. B.; and Carin, L. 2011. Topic modeling with nonparametric Markov tree. In ICML, 377-384.
11. Cohen, A. M.; Hersh, W. R.; Peterson, K.; and Yen, P.-Y. 2006. Reducing workload in systematic review preparation using automated citation classification. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13(2):206-219.
12. Doshi-Velez, F.; Ge, Y.; and Kohane, I. 2013. Comorbidity clusters in autism spectrum disorders: An electronic health record time-series analysis. Pediatrics.
13. Fl-Arini, K.; Fox, E. B.; and Guestrin, C. 2012. Concept modeling with superwords, http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2523.
14. Fei-Fei, L., and Perona, P. 2005. A Bayesian hierarchical model for learning natural scene categories. In CVPR, volume 2, 524-531.
15. Ghassemi, M.; Naumann, T.; Joshi, R.; and Rumshisky, A. 2012. Topic models for mortality modeling in intensive care units. In ICML 2012 Machine Learning for Clinical Data Analysis Workshop.
16. Griffiths, T., and Ghahramani, Z. 2011. The Indian buffet process: An introduction and review. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12:1185-1224.
17. Griffiths, T. L., and Steyvers, M. 2004. Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:5228-5235.
18. Grimshaw, J. M., and Russell, I. T. 1993. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. The Lancet 342(8883):1317-1322.
19. Li, W., and McCallum, A. 2006. Pachinko allocation: DAG-structured mixture models of topic correlations. In ICML, 577-584.
20. Lipscomb, C. E. 2000. Medical subject headings (MeSH). Bull Med Libr Assoc. 88(3):265266.'
21. Mimno, D.; Wallach, H.; Talley, E.; Leenders, M.; and Mc-Callum, A. 2011. Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In EMNLP.
22. Newman, D.; Lau, J. H.; Grieser, K.; and Baldwin, T. 2010. Automatic evaluation of topic coherence. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, HLT'10, 100-108. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Slutsky, A.; Hu, X.; and An, Y. 2013. Tree labeled LDA: A hierarchical model for web summaries. In IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 134-140.
24. Steyvers, M., and Griffiths, T. 2007. Probabilistic topic models. Handbook of latent semantic analysis 427(7):424-440.
25. Wang, C., and Blei, D. 2009. Decoupling Sparsity and Smoothness in the Discrete Hierarchical Dirichlet Process. In Bengio, Y.; Schuurmans, D.; Lafferty, J.; Williams, C. K. I.; and Culotta, A., eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22. 1982-1989.
26. Wang, Y., and Mori, G. 2009. Human action recognition by semilatent topic models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31(10):1762-1774.
27. Williamson, S.; Wang, C.; Heller, K. A.; and Blei, D. M. 2010. The IBP compound Dirichlet process and its application to focused topic modeling. In ICML, 1151-1158.