Coral reefs under threat in a Caribbean marine protected area: Assessing divers' willingness to pay toward conservation

Marine Policy

Volumn 68, Issue , 2016, Pages 146-154

  Trujillo, Juan C ^a   Carrillo, Bladimir ^b   Charris, Carlos A ^b   Velilla, Raul A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Caribbean Sea; Contingent valuation method; Coral reef management; Marine protected area; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

COASTAL EROSION; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CONTINGENT VALUATION; CORAL REEF; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FUTURE PROSPECT; MARINE PARK; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; CARIBBEAN SEA; COLOMBIA;

ANTHOZOA;

EID: 84960145755     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Burke L., Maidens J. Reefs at risk in the Caribbean 2006, World Resour. Inst., Washington, DC.
2. Maes F. The international legal framework for marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 2008, 32:797-810.
3. E. Zarza-González, P.N.N. De Colombia, EL Entorno Ambiental del Parque Nacional Natural Corales del Rosario y De San Bernardo, 2011.
4. Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development, Parques Naturales De Colombia, 2013. http://www.parquesnacionales.gov.co/PNN/portel/libreria/php/decide.php?patron=01.2013.
5. Barrios L.M. Evaluación de las Principales Condiciones de Deterioro de los Corales Pétreos en El Caribe Colombiano 2000, Monogr. M. Sc. Biol. Mar. Univ. Nal. Colomb., St. Marta.
6. Díaz J.M., Barrios L.M., Cendales M.H., Garzón-Ferreira J., Geister J., López-Victoria M., et al. Áreas coralinas de Colombia 2000, 5. Ser. Publ. Espec.
7. Asafu-Adjaye J., Tapsuwan S. A contingent valuation study of scuba diving benefits: case study in mu Ko Similan marine national park, Thailand. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29:1122-1130.
8. Ransom K.P., Mangi S.C. Valuing recreational benefits of coral reefs: the case of Mombasa marine national park and reserve, Kenya. Environ. Manag. 2010, 45:145-154.
9. Seenprachawong U. Economic valuation of coral reefs at phi phi Islands, Thailand. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 2003, 3:104-114.
10. Ahmed M., Umali G.M., Chong C.K., Rull M.F., Garcia M.C. Valuing recreational and conservation benefits of coral Reefs-the case of Bolinao, Philippines. Ocean Coast. Manag 2007, 50:103-118.
11. Cruz J.L.J., Calle G.M. Valoración económica del buceo como estrategia de uso sostenible de la biodiversidad marina, archipielago de san andres y providencia caribe colombiano. Gest. Ambient. 2011, 14:37.
12. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using Surveys To Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method 1989, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
13. Hanemann M., Loomis J., Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1991, 73:1255-1263.
14. Forster B.A. Valuing outdoor recreational activity: a methodological survey. J. Leis. Res. 1989, 21:181.
15. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E.E., Radner R., Schuman H. Report of the US national oceanic and atmospheric administration panel on contingent valuation 1993, 11. Resour. Futur., Washington, DC.
16. Diamond P.A., Hausman J.A. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number?. J. Econ. Perspect. 1994, 8:45-64.
17. Hanemann W.M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J. Econ. Perspect. 1994, 8:19-43.
18. Hausman J. Contingent valuation: from dubious to Hopeless. J. Econ. Perspect. 2012, 26:43-56.
19. Carson R.T. Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren't available. J. Econ. Perspect. 2012, 26:27-42.
20. Haab T.C., Interis M.G., Petrolia D.R., Whitehead J.C. From Hopeless to curious? Thoughts on Hausman's "dubious to hopeless" critique of contingent valuation. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2013, ppt029.
21. Hanemann W.M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1984, 66:332-341.
22. Bishop R.C., Heberlein T.A. Measuring values of Extramarket goods: are indirect measures biased?. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1979, 61:926-930.
23. Cameron T.A. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1988, 15:355-379.
24. Amemiya T. Advanced econometrics 1985, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.
25. Carson R.T., Hanemann W.M., Mitchell R.C. Determining the Demand for Public Goods by Simulating Referendums at Different Tax Prices, Manuscript 1986, University of. California, San Diego.
26. Cameron T.A., Quiggin J. Estimation using contingent valuation data from a" dichotomous choice with follow-up" questionnaire. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1994, 27:218-234.
27. Creel M. A note on consistent estimation of mean WTP using a Misspecified Logit contingent valuation model. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1998, 35:277-284.
28. Kriström B. Valuing Environmental Benefits Using the Contingent Valuation Method: An Econometric Analysis 1990.
29. Krinsky I., Robb A.L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1986, 715-719.
30. Hanemann W.M. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?. Am. Econ. Rev. 1991, 81:635-647.
31. Kling C.L., Phaneuf D.J., Zhao J. From Exxon to BP: has some number become better than no number?. J. Econ. Perspect. 2012, 26:3-26.