A note on consistent estimation of mean WTP using a misspecified logit contingent valuation model

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 277-284

  Creel, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; METHODOLOGY; MODELING; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0032079213     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1998.1030     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Alberini A. Efficiency vs bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: Bivariate and interval-data models. J.Environ. Econom. Management. 29:1995;169-180.
2. Cooper J. Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 24:1993;25-40.
3. M. Creel, A monte carlo comparison of two nonparametric methods for referendum contingent valuation data.
4. Creel M., Loomis J. Semi-nonparametric distribution-free dichotomous choice contingent valuation. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 32:1997;341-358.
5. Gallant A. R. Nonlinear Statistical Models. 1987;Wiley, New York.
6. M. Hanemann, B. Kanninen, The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-Response CV Data, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, 1996.
7. J. Huang, D. Nychka, K. Smith, Nonparametric Discrete Choice Methods for Measuring Economic Values, Department of Economics, Duke University, 1995.
8. Kriström B. A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. Land Econom. 66:1990;135-139.
9. D. McFadden, Contingent valuation and social choice, Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 76, 689, 708.