Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention

Psychological Research

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 571-581

  Stoet, Gijsbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84960124991     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0763-4     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14, 427–432.
2. Alwall, N., Johansson, D., & Hansen, S. (2010). The gender difference in gaze-cueing: Associations with empathizing and systemizing. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 729–732.
3. Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of autism: Evolutionary approaches. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1249–1257). Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Bayliss, A. P., di Pellegrino, G., & Tipper, S. P. (2005). Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58(4), 631–650.
5. Biederman, J., Mick, E., Faraone, S. V., Braaten, E., Doyle, A., Spencer, T., et al. (2002). Influence of gender on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children referred to a psychiatric clinic. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 36–42.
6. Brötzner, C. P., Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Zauner, A., & Kerschbaum, H. H. (2014). Resting state alpha frequency is associated with menstrual cycle phase, estradiol and use of oral contraceptives. Brain Research, 1577, 36–44.
7. Brötzner, C. P., Klimesch, W., & Kerschbaum, H. H. (2015). Progesterone-associated increase in ERP amplitude correlates with an improvement in performance in a spatial attention paradigm. Brain Research, 595, 74–83.
8. Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.
9. Chajut, E., Schupak, A., & Algom, D. (2009). Are spatial and dimensional atention separate? Evidence from Posner, Stroop, and Eriksen tasks. Memory and Cognition, 37, 924–934.
10. Christakou, A., Halari, R., Smith, A. B., Ifkovits, E., Brammer, M., & Rubia, K. (2009). Sex-dependent age modulation of frontostriatal and temporo-parietal activation during cognitive control. Neuroimage, 48, 223–236.
11. Clayson, P. E., Clawson, A., & Larson, M. J. (2011). Sex differences in electrophysiological indices of conflict monitoring. Biological Psychology, 87(2), 282–289.
12. Colzato, L. S., Hertsig, G., van den Wildenberg, W., & Hommel, B. (2010). Estrogen modulates inhibitory control in healthy human females: Evidence from the stop-signal paradigm. Neuroscience, 167, 709–715.
13. Colzato, L. S., Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2012). Estrogen modulates inhibition of return in healthy human females. Neuropsychologia, 50, 98–103.
14. Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One, 8(3), e57410.
15. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1211–1214.
16. Driver, J. (2001). A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 53–78.
17. Eimer, M. (2014). The neural basis of attentional control in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(10), 526–535.
18. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.
19. Evans, K., & Hampson, E. (2015). Sex-dependent effects on tasks assessing reinforcement learning and interference inhibition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1044.
20. Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Gaub, M., & Carlson, C. I. (1997). Gender differences in ADHD: A meta-analysis and critical review. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1036–1045.
22. Gaulin, S. J. C., & Fitzgerald, R. W. (1986). Sex-differences in spatial ability—an evolutionary hypothesis and test. American Naturalist, 127, 74–88.
23. Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
24. Hampson, E. (1990). Variations in sex-related cognitive-abilities across the menstrual-cycle. Brain and Cognition, 14, 26–43.
25. Hatta, T., & Nagaya, K. (2009). Menstrual cycle phase effects on memory and Stroop task performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 821–827.
26. Hausmann, M., Slabbekoorn, D., Van, G., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., & Gunturkun, O. (2000). Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience, 114, 1245–1250.
27. Hommel, B. (1993). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208–222.
28. Hübner, R., Steinhauser, M., & Lehle, C. (2010). A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review, 117, 759–784.
29. Judge, J., & Taylor, P. J. (2012). Gender differences on the semantic flanker task using transposed-letter target words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(10), 2008–2017.
30. Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 315–341.
31. Kimchi, R., Amishav, R., & Sulitzeanu-Kenan, A. (2003). Gender differences in global-local perception? Evidence from orientation and shape judgments. Acta Psychologica, 130(1), 64–71.
32. Kimura, D. (1996). Sex, sexual orientation and sex hormones influence human cognitive function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 259–263.
33. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138–147.
34. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253–270.
35. Lee, K., & Choo, H. (2013). A critical review of selective attention: An interdisciplinary perspective. Artificial Intelligence Review, 40, 27–50.
36. Lee, J., Chung, D., Chang, S., Kim, S., Kim, S. W., Park, H., Jeong, J. (2012). Gender differences revealed in the right posterior temporal areas during Navon letter identification tasks. Brain Imaging, 6, 387–396.
37. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203.
38. Majeres, R. L. (1999). Sex differences in phonological processes: Speed matching and word reading. Memory and Cognition, 27, 246–253.
39. Merritt, P., Hirshman, E., Wharton, W., Stangl, B., Devlin, J., & Lenz, A. (2007). Evidence for gender differences in visual selective attention. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 597–609.
40. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383.
41. Navon, D. (2003). What does a compound letter tell the psychologist’s mind? Acta Psychologica, 114, 273–309.
42. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 4716.
43. Pletzer, B. (2014). Sex-specific strategy use and global-local processing: A perspective toward integrating sex differences in cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 425.
44. Pletzer, B., Petasis, O., & Cahill, L. (2014). Switching between forest and trees: Opposite relationship of progesterone and testosterone to global-local processing. Hormones and Behavior, 66, 257–266.
45. Plude, D. J., Enns, J. T., & Brodeur, D. (1994). The development of selective attention—a life-span overview. Acta Psychologica, 86, 227–272.
46. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
47. Rabbitt, P., & Rodgers, B. (1977). What does a man do after an error? An analysis of response programming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 727–743.
48. R development core team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.
49. Razumnikova, O. M., & Volf, N. V. (2011). Information processing specialization during interference between global and local aspects of visual hierarchical stimuli in men and women. Human Physiology, 37, 137–142.
50. Roalf, D., Lowery, N., & Turetsky, B. I. (2006). Behavioral and physiological findings of gender differences in global-local visual processing. Brain and Cognition, 60, 32–42.
51. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umiltà, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(5), 1353–1364.
52. Sänger, J., Schneider, D., Beste, C., & Wascher, E. (2012). Sex differences in competition-based attentional selection. Zeitschrift für Psychologie—Journal of Psychology, 220(2), 90–97.
53. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.
54. Simon, J. R., & Wolf, J. D. (1963). Choice reaction times as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6, 99–105.
55. Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit - A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104.
56. Stoet, G. (2011). Sex differences in search and gathering skills. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 416–422.
57. Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2013). Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within- and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data. PLoS One, 8(3), e57988.
58. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
59. Thakkar, K. N., Congdon, E., Poldrack, R. A., Sabb, F. W., London, E. D., Cannon, T. D., & Bilder, R. M. (2014). Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 254–272.
60. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.
61. Trent, S., & Davies, W. (2012). The influence of sex-linked genetic mechanisms on attention and impulsivity. Biological Psychology, 89, 1–13.
62. Van der Elst, W., Van Boxtel, M., Van Breukelen, G., & Jolles, J. (2006). The stroop color-word test—influence of age, sex, and education; and normative data for a large sample across the adult age range. Assessment, 13, 62–79.