Tobacco control and health advocacy in the European Union: Understanding effective coalition-building

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 122-129

  Weishaar, Heide ^a   Collin, Jeff ^b   Amos, Amanda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG INDUSTRY; EUROPEAN UNION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SMOKING BAN; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; PASSIVE SMOKING; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; SMOKING; STANDARDS;

PASSIVE SMOKING;

CONSUMER ADVOCACY; EUROPEAN UNION; HEALTH CARE COALITIONS; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH; SMOKE-FREE POLICY; SMOKING; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION;

EID: 84960121911     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv016     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Chapman S. Public Health Advocacy and Tobacco Control. Making Smoking History. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 2007.
2. Princen S. Advocacy coalitions and the internationalisation of Public Health Policies. Int J Pub Pol. 2007;27:13-33.
3. Smith KE. Understanding the influence of evidence in Public Health Policy: what can we learn from the 'tobacco wars'? Soc Policy Admin. 2013;47:382-398.
4. Cairney P, Studlar DT, Mamudu HM. Global Tobacco Control: Power, Policy, Governance and Transfer. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
5. Harrison R, Hurst J. The Unwelcome Guest. How Scotland Invited the Tobacco Industry to Smoke Outside. 2005. http://www.ashscotland.org.uk/ash/4366. Accessed February 9, 2010.
6. Arnott D, Dockrell M, Sandford A, Willmore I. Comprehensive smokefree legislation in England: how advocacy won the day. Tob Control. 2007;16:423-428.
7. Currie LM, Clancy L. The road to smoke-free legislation in Ireland. Addiction. 2011;106:15-24.
8. Mamudu HM, Glantz SA. Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Glob Public Health. 2009;4:150-168.
9. Nathanson CA. Social movements as catalysts for policy change: the case of smoking and guns. J Health Polit Polic. 1999;24:421-488.
10. Sabatier PA. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. J Eur Public Policy. 1998;5:98-130.
11. Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1993.
12. Keck ME, Sikkink K. Activists beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1998.
13. Bomberg E, Peterson J. European Union Decision Making: the role of Subnational Authorities. Polit Stud-London. 1998;46:219-235.
14. Coen D. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. J Eur Public Policy. 2007;14:333-345.
15. Watson R, Shackelton M. Organized interests and lobbying. In: Bomberg E, Peterson J, Stubb A, eds. The European Union: How Does it Work? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008:92-111.
16. Mahoney C. Networking vs. allying: the decision of interest groups to join coalitions in the US and the EU. J Eur Public Policy. 2007;14:366-383.
17. Council of the European Union. Council Recommendation of 30 November 2009 on smoke-free environments (2009/C 296/02). Official Journal of the European Union. 2009;C 296/4.
18. Bauer MW. Classical Content Analysis: a review. In: Bauer MW, Gaskell G, eds. Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. A Practical Handbook. London, UK: Sage; 2000:131-151.
19. Boyatzis RE. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
20. QSR NVivo Version 7.0.281.0.SP4 [computer program]. Southport, UK: QSR International; 2007.
21. Weishaar H, Amos A, Collin J. Capturing complexity: mixing methods in the analysis of a European tobacco control policy network. Int J Soc Res Meth. 2015;18:175-192. doi:10.1080/13645579.2014.897851.
22. GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis. Tobacco Control Compendium for EU Policymakers. From Smoke Free Environments to Smoke Free Citizens-Smoking Cessation, Helping Europe to Quit. Brussels, Belgium: GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis;2008.
23. GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, European Network of Quitlines, et al. Flyer for an Evening Dinner Debate on 10 October 2006 in the European Parliament. Supporting Smoke Free Environments With Smoking Cessation. Brussels, Belgium: GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, European Network of Quitlines, Quit UK, Pharmaceutical Group of the European Union, Smokefree Partnership, Standing Committee of European Doctors;2006.
24. Klijn E-H, Edelenbos J, Steijn B. Trust in Governance Networks: its impacts on outcomes. Admin Soc. 2010;42:193-221.
25. Boessen S, Maarse H. A ban on tobacco advertising: the role of interest groups. In: Coen D, Richardson J, eds. Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, Actors, and Issues. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009:212-232.
26. Arnott D, Willmore I. Smoke and Mirrors. The Guardian. July 19, 2006. www.theguardian.com/society/2006/jul/19/health.healthandwellbeing. Accessed February 26, 2015.
27. Luke DA, Harris JK. Network Analysis in Public Health: History, Methods, and Applications. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2007;28:69-93.
28. Greenwood J. Interest representation in the European Union. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillian; 2003.
29. Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation in the EU. Bursting the Brussels Bubble. The Battle to Expose Corporate Lobbying at the Heart of the EU. Brussels, Belgium: Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation in the EU (ALTER-EU); 2010.
30. Christopoulos D. Relational attributes of political entrepreneurs: a network perspective. J Eur Public Policy. 2006;13:757-778.
31. Schneider M, Teske P. Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: evidence from local government. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1992;86:737-747. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1964135.Accessed December 19, 2014.
32. European Network for Smoking Prevention. Response to EC Consultation Green Paper: Towards a Europe Free from Tobacco Smoke: Policy Options at EU Level. 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/life_style/tobacco/documents/r-042_en.pdf.Accessed July 24, 2012.
33. Action on Smoking and Health England. ASH Response to the European Commission's Green Paper: 'Towards a Europe free from tobacco smoke: policy options at EU level'. 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/life_style/tobacco/documents/r-080_en.pdf.Accessed July 24, 2012.
34. German Cancer Research Center. Position of the Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (German Cancer Research Center) on Questions of the European Commission Regarding "Greenpaper: Towards a Europe Free from Tobacco Smoke: Policy Options at EU level". 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/life_style/tobacco/documents/r-088_en.pdf.Accessed June 19, 2012.
35. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Guidelines for Implementation. Article 5.3; Article 8; Article 11; Article 13. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.
36. European Public Health Alliance. EPHA Response to the Commission Green Paper on a Smokefree Europe. 2007. http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_determinants/life_style/tobacco/documents/r-046_en.pdf.Accessed July 24, 2012.