Erratum to: Capturing complexity: mixing methods in the analysis of a European tobacco control policy network[International Journal of Social Research Methodology, (2014), 10.1080/13645579.2014.897851];Capturing complexity: mixing methods in the analysis of a European tobacco control policy network

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 175-192

  Weishaar, Heide ^a   Amos, Amanda ^a   Collin, Jeff ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

plagiarism detection software; policy analysis; policy network; social network analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920595598     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2014.956481     Document Type: Erratum

References (60)

1. Bauer, M. W. (2000). Classical content analysis: A review. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 131–151). London: Sage.
2. Bellotti, E. (2012). Getting funded. Multi-level network of physicists in Italy. Social Networks, 34, 215–229.10.1016/j.socnet.2011.12.002
3. Blaikie, N. (2000). Chapter 5: Concepts, theories, hypotheses and models. In N. Blaikie (Ed.), Designing social research: The logic of anticipation (pp. 128–182). Malden, MA: Polity Press.
4. Bomberg, E., Stubb, A., & Peterson, J. (2008). Introduction. In E. Bomberg, J. Peterson, & A. Stubb (Eds.), The European union: How does it work? (pp. 3–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw software for network visualization. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
6. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
7. Börzel, T. A., & Heard-Lauréote, K. (2009). Networks in EU multi-level governance: Concepts and contributions. Journal of Public Policy, 29, 135–152.10.1017/S0143814X09001044
8. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Butts, C. T. (2009). Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science, 325, 414–416.10.1126/science.1171022
10. Cairney, P. (2007). A ‘Multiple Lenses’ approach to policy change: The case of tobacco policy in the UK. British Politics, 2, 45–68.
11. Campbell, R. B., & Balbach, E. D. (2011). Manufacturing credibility: The national energy management institute and the tobacco institute’s strategy for indoor air quality. American Journal of Public Health, 101, 497–503. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.19969510.2105/AJPH.2010.199695
12. Catanese, S. A., De Meo, P., Ferrara, E., Fiumara, G., & Provetti, A. (2011). Crawling facebook for social network analysis purposes. Paper presented at the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, Sogndal, Norway.
13. Christopoulos, D. C. (2006). Relational attributes of political entrepreneurs: A network perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 757–778.10.1080/13501760600808964
14. Christopoulos, D. C. (2008). The governance of networks: Heuristic or formal analysis? A reply to Rachel Parker. Political Studies, 56, 475–481.10.1111/post.2008.56.issue-2
15. Christopoulos, D. C., & Quaglia, L. (2009). Network constraints in EU banking regulation: The capital requirements directive. Journal of Public Policy, 29, 179–200.10.1017/S0143814X09001068
16. Council of the European Union. (2009). Council recommendation of 30 November 2009 on smoke-free environments (2009/C 296/02). Official Journal of the European Union, C 296/4–296/14.
17. Crossley, N. (2008). (Net)Working out: Social capital in a private health club. The British Journal of Sociology, 59, 475–500. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00204.x10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00204.x
18. Crossley, N. (2010). The social world of the network. Combining qualitative and quantitative elements in social network analysis. Sociologica, 1, 1–33. doi:10.2383/32049
19. Directorate General Health and Consumers. (2007a). Green paper. Towards a Europe free from tobacco smoke: Policy options at EU level. COM(2007) 27 final. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/life_style/Tobacco/Documents/gp_smoke_en.pdf
20. Directorate General Health and Consumers. (2007b). Report on the green paper consultation ‘Towards a Europe free from tobacco smoke: Policy options at EU level’. Retrieved May 14, 2010, from http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/life_style/Tobacco/Documents/smoke_free_frep_en.pdf
21. Directorate General Health and Consumers. (2007c). Submissions to the consultation on the European commission’s green paper ‘Towards a Europe free from tobacco smoke: Policy options at EU level’. Retrieved 22 March, 2010, from http://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/law/free_environments/free_environments_consultation/index_en.htm
22. Drope, J., Bialous, S. A., & Glantz, S. A. (2004). Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America. Tobacco Control, 13, i41–i47.10.1136/tc.2003.004101
23. Edwards, G. (2010). Mixed-method approaches to social network analysis. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Retrieved December 18, 2012, from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/842/1/Social_Network_analysis_Edwards.pdf
24. Edwards, G., & Crossley, N. (2009). Measures and meanings: Exploring the Ego-Net of Helen Kirkpatrick Watts, Militant Suffragette. Methodological Innovations Online, 4, 37–61.
25. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317.10.1086/ajs.1997.103.issue-2
26. Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411–1454.10.1086/ajs.1994.99.issue-6
27. Farquharson, K. (2003). Influencing policy transnationally: Pro- and anti-tobacco global advocacy networks. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62, 80–92.10.1111/ajpa.2003.62.issue-4
28. Finnegan, R. (1996). Using documents. In R. Sapsford & V. Jupp (Eds.), Data collection and analysis (pp. 138–151). London: Sage.
29. Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 7821–7826.10.1073/pnas.122653799
30. Harris, J. K., Luke, D. A., Burke, R. C., & Mueller, N. B. (2008). Seeing the forest and the trees: Using network analysis to develop an organizational blueprint of state tobacco control systems. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 1669–1678.10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.013
31. Heclo, H. (1975). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87–124). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
32. iParadigms LLC. (2012). Turnitin. Retrieved June 4, 2012, from http://turnitin.com/en_us/home
33. Jack, S. (2010). Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 120–137.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.010
34. John, P. (1998). Analysing public policy. London: Continuum.
35. Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36. Knox, H., Savage, M., & Harvey, P. (2006). Social networks and the study of relations: Networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society, 35, 113–140.10.1080/03085140500465899
37. Kossinets, G. (2006). Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks, 28, 247–268.10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002
38. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30, 330–342.10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.002
39. Lievrouw, L., Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C., & Nadel, E. (1987). Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks, 9, 217–248.10.1016/0378-8733(87)90021-9
40. Lubell, M., Scholz, J., Berardo, R., & Robins, G. (2012). Testing policy theory with statistical models of networks. Policy Studies Journal, 40, 351–374. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00457.x10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00457.x
41. Luke, D. A., Harris, J. K., Shelton, S., Allen, P., Carothers, B. J., & Mueller, N. B. (2010). Systems analysis of collaboration in 5 national tobacco control networks. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1290–1297.10.2105/AJPH.2009.184358
42. Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: An introduction. In P. Carrington & J. Scott (Eds.), The sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 11–25). London: Sage.
43. Marsh, D. (1998). The utility and future of policy network analysis. In D. Marsh (Ed.), Comparing policy networks (pp. 185–197). Buckingham: Open University Press.
44. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17, 13–17.10.3102/0013189X017002013
45. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 375–387.10.1080/13645570500402447
46. Padgett, J. F., & Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1259–1319.10.1086/ajs.1993.98.issue-6
47. Peterson, J. (2009). Policy networks. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (pp. 105–124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Peterson, J., Bomberg, E., & Stubb, A. (2008). Conclusion. In E. Bomberg, J. Peterson, & A. Stubb (Eds.), The European Union: How does it work? (pp. 222–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. QSR International. (2007). QSR NVivo Version 7.0.281.0.SP4. Southport: Author.
50. Read, M. (1992). Policy networks and issue networks: The politics of smoking. In D. Marsh & R. A. W. Rhodes (Eds.), Policy networks in british government (pp. 124–148). Oxford: Clarendon.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198278528.001.0001
51. Real, A., & Hasanagas, N. D. (2005). Complete network analysis in research of organized interests and policy analysis: Indicators, methodical aspects and challenges. Connections, 26, 89–106.
52. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). The European union, cohesion policy and sub-national authorities in the United Kingdom. In R. A. W. Rhodes (Ed.), Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability (pp. 137–162). Buckingham: Open University Press.
53. Sabatier, P. A. (1993). Policy change over a decade or more. In P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning (pp. 13–39). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
54. Sato, H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework and the policy process analysis: The case of smoking control in Japan. Policy Studies Journal, 27, 28–44.10.1111/psj.1999.27.issue-1
55. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.
56. Smith, K. E. (2013). Understanding the influence of evidence in public health policy: What can we learn from the ‘tobacco wars’? Social Policy & Administration, 47, 382–398.
57. Thompson, G. F. (2004). Is all the world a complex network? Economy and Society, 33, 411–424.10.1080/0308514042000225725
58. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815478
59. Wipfli, H. L., Fujimoto, K., & Valente, T. W. (2010). Global tobacco control diffusion: The case of the framework convention on tobacco control. Tobacco Control, 100, 1260–1266.
60. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.