메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 392-402

Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of important bird and biodiversity areas

(20)  Di Marco, Moreno a,b   Brooks, Thomas c,d,e   Cuttelod, Annabelle f   Fishpool, Lincoln D C g   Rondinini, Carlo a   Smith, Robert J h   Bennun, Leon i   Butchart, Stuart H M g   Ferrier, Simon j   Foppen, Ruud P B k,l,m   Joppa, Lucas n   Juffe Bignoli, Diego o   Knight, Andrew T b,p,q   Lamoreux, John F r   Langhammer, Penny F s   May, Ian g   Possingham, Hugh P b,p   Visconti, Piero n   Watson, James E M t   Woodley, Stephen u  


Author keywords

Complementarity; Convention on biological diversity; Irreplaceability; Key biodiversity areas; Restricted range species; Systematic conservation planning; Threatened species

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIRD; COMPLEMENTARITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; IDENTIFICATION KEY; NATURE CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREA; RANGE SIZE; REPLACEMENT; SPECIES INVENTORY;

EID: 84960109805     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12609     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (25)

References (43)
  • 1
    • 73649137222 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation
    • Pages - in Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP, editors. . Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
    • Ball IR, Possingham HP, Watts M. 2009. Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation. Pages 185-195 in Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP, editors. Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
    • (2009) Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools , pp. 185-195
    • Ball, I.R.1    Possingham, H.P.2    Watts, M.3
  • 5
    • 84960089277 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Available from(accessed April 2013).
    • BirdLife International. 2015. Important bird and biodiversity area digital boundaries. BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Available from www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/ibadownload (accessed April 2013).
    • (2015) Important bird and biodiversity area digital boundaries
  • 6
    • 83655177863 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom and NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
    • BirdLife International and NatureServe. 2013. Bird species distribution maps of the world. Version 3.0. BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom and NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
    • (2013) Bird species distribution maps of the world. Version 3.0
  • 8
    • 77953018255 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines
    • Butchart SHM, et al. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164-1168.
    • (2010) Science , vol.328 , pp. 1164-1168
    • Butchart, S.H.M.1
  • 9
    • 84858668604 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets
    • Butchart SHM, et al. 2012. Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PloS ONE 7 (e32529). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0032529.
    • (2012) PloS ONE , vol.7
    • Butchart, S.H.M.1
  • 10
    • 84945443292 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets
    • Butchart SHM, et al. 2015. Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12158.
    • (2015) Conservation Letters
    • Butchart, S.H.M.1
  • 12
    • 84949798108 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • COP Decision X/2: strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020
    • (Accessed January 2015).
    • Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 2011. COP Decision X/2: strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020. Available from http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268 (accessed January 2015).
    • (2011)
  • 13
    • 0038738343 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot-the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa
    • Cowling R, Pressey R, Rouget M, Lombard A. 2003. A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot-the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation 112:191-216.
    • (2003) Biological Conservation , vol.112 , pp. 191-216
    • Cowling, R.1    Pressey, R.2    Rouget, M.3    Lombard, A.4
  • 16
    • 19944365178 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets
    • Eken G, et al. 2004. Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience 54:1110-1118.
    • (2004) BioScience , vol.54 , pp. 1110-1118
    • Eken, G.1
  • 17
    • 33244464260 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Establishing representative no-take areas in the great barrier reef: Large-scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas
    • Fernandes L, et al. 2005. Establishing representative no-take areas in the great barrier reef: Large-scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas. Conservation 9:1733-1744.
    • (2005) Conservation , vol.9 , pp. 1733-1744
    • Fernandes, L.1
  • 18
    • 0034089328 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement
    • Ferrier S, Pressey R, Barrett T. 2000. A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biological Conservation 93:303-325.
    • (2000) Biological Conservation , vol.93 , pp. 303-325
    • Ferrier, S.1    Pressey, R.2    Barrett, T.3
  • 23
    • 84863413525 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the Key Biodiversity Area approach refined and tested for continental Africa
    • Holland RA, Darwall WRT, Smith KG. 2012. Conservation priorities for freshwater biodiversity: the Key Biodiversity Area approach refined and tested for continental Africa. Biological Conservation 148:167-179.
    • (2012) Biological Conservation , vol.148 , pp. 167-179
    • Holland, R.A.1    Darwall, W.R.T.2    Smith, K.G.3
  • 24
    • 0035988573 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history
    • Justus J, Sarkar S. 2002. The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history. Journal of Biosciences 27:421-435.
    • (2002) Journal of Biosciences , vol.27 , pp. 421-435
    • Justus, J.1    Sarkar, S.2
  • 25
    • 34547768849 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the key biodiversity areas approach for effective conservation planning
    • Knight AT, et al. 2007. Improving the key biodiversity areas approach for effective conservation planning. BioScience 57:256-261.
    • (2007) BioScience , vol.57 , pp. 256-261
    • Knight, A.T.1
  • 26
  • 28
    • 0034636577 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic conservation planning
    • Margules CR, Pressey RL. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243-253.
    • (2000) Nature , vol.405 , pp. 243-253
    • Margules, C.R.1    Pressey, R.L.2
  • 29
    • 84869143530 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs
    • McCarthy DP, et al. 2012. Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs. Science 338:946-949.
    • (2012) Science , vol.338 , pp. 946-949
    • McCarthy, D.P.1
  • 30
    • 84934094966 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Understanding characteristics that define the feasibility of conservation actions in a common pool marine resource governance system
    • Mills M, Pressey RL, Ban NC, Foale S, Aswani S, Knight AT. 2013. Understanding characteristics that define the feasibility of conservation actions in a common pool marine resource governance system. Conservation Letters 6:418-429.
    • (2013) Conservation Letters , vol.6 , pp. 418-429
    • Mills, M.1    Pressey, R.L.2    Ban, N.C.3    Foale, S.4    Aswani, S.5    Knight, A.T.6
  • 34
    • 0002368325 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks
    • Pages - in Ferson M, Burgman S, editors. . Springer Verlag, New York.
    • Possingham H, Ball HPI, Andelman S. 2000. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. Pages 291-305 in Ferson M, Burgman S,  editors. Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer Verlag, New York.
    • (2000) Quantitative methods for conservation biology , pp. 291-305
    • Possingham, H.1    Ball, H.P.I.2    Andelman, S.3
  • 35
    • 0028163181 scopus 로고
    • Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal
    • Pressey R, Johnson I, Wilson P. 1994. Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity & Conservation 3:242-262.
    • (1994) Biodiversity & Conservation , vol.3 , pp. 242-262
    • Pressey, R.1    Johnson, I.2    Wilson, P.3
  • 37
    • 19944373718 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network
    • Rodrigues ASL, et al. 2004. Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. BioScience 54:1092-1100.
    • (2004) BioScience , vol.54 , pp. 1092-1100
    • Rodrigues, A.S.L.1
  • 38
    • 58549090711 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing best practice for using Marxan to locate marine protected areas in European waters
    • Smith RJ, Eastwood PD, Ota Y, Rogers SI. 2009. Developing best practice for using Marxan to locate marine protected areas in European waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66:188-194.
    • (2009) ICES Journal of Marine Science , vol.66 , pp. 188-194
    • Smith, R.J.1    Eastwood, P.D.2    Ota, Y.3    Rogers, S.I.4
  • 40
    • 31044447916 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prime butterfly areas of Europe: an initial selection of priority sites for conservation
    • van Swaay CaM, Warren MS. 2006. Prime butterfly areas of Europe: an initial selection of priority sites for conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation10:5-11.
    • (2006) Journal of Insect Conservation , vol.10 , pp. 5-11
    • van Swaay, C.1    Warren, M.S.2
  • 41
    • 84903287204 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity
    • Venter O, et al. 2014. Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biology 12:e1001891. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891.
    • (2014) PLoS Biology , vol.12 , pp. e1001891
    • Venter, O.1
  • 42


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.