Looking back on 5 years of horizon scanning in oncology

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 32, Issue 1-2, 2016, Pages 54-60

  Nachtnebel, Anna ^a   Breuer, Johanna ^a   Willenbacher, Wolfgang ^b   Bucsics, Anna ^c   Krippl, Peter ^d   Wild, Claudia ^a  

^a LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR LUNG VASCULAR RESEARCH   (Austria)

^b INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^d Krankenanstaltengesellschaft M B H Krankenhausverbund Feldbach Fürstenfeld ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

Awareness; Biomedical; Cooperative behavior; Health policy; Key words: Program evaluation; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; ONCOLOGY; SURVEYS;

AWARENESS; BIOMEDICAL; CO-OPERATIVE BEHAVIORS; HEALTH POLICY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EVEROLIMUS; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHRONIC LYMPHATIC LEUKEMIA; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; E-MAIL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KIDNEY CANCER; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MULTIPLE MYELOMA; NONHODGKIN LYMPHOMA; ONCOLOGY; ONLINE SYSTEM; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; WEB BROWSER; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; AWARENESS; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COOPERATION; ECONOMICS; EXPERT WITNESS; INTERNET; MANAGEMENT; MASS COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; AWARENESS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EXPERT TESTIMONY; HUMANS; INTERNET; POLICY MAKING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 84960089335     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462316000052     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Nachtnebel A, Geiger-Gritsch S, Hintringer K, Wild C. Scanning the horizon: Development and implementation of an early awareness system for anticancer drugs in Austria. Health Policy. 2012;104:1-11
2. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment. Horizon scanning in oncology. http://eprints.hta.lbg.ac.at/view/types/ dsd-hso.html (accessed August 16, 2015)
3. Zechmeister I, Schumacher I. The impact of health technology assessment reports on decision making in Austria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:77-84
4. Douw K, Vondeling H. Selection of new health technologies for assessment aimed at informing decision making: A survey among horizon scanning systems. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:177-183
5. Packer C, Fung M, Stevens A. Analyzing 10 years of early awareness and alert activity in the United kingdom. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:308-314
6. Packer C, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I, Simpson S. The evolution of early awareness and alert methods and systems. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:199-200
7. EuroScan International Network. A toolkit for the identification and assessment of new and emerging health technologies. Birmingham: EuroScan International Network; 2014
8. Integrate-HTA. http://www.integrate-hta.eu/ (accessedAugust 10, 2015)
9. Shaping European Early Dialogues for health technologies. http://www.earlydialogues.eu/has/ (accessed August 10, 2015)
10. Advance-HTA. http://www.advance-hta.eu/ (accessed August 10, 2015)
11. Gerhardus A, Dorendorf E, Rottingen J, Santamera A. Health technology assessment and health policy making in Europe - Current status, challenges and potential. Brussels: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policy; 2008
12. Sheehan KB. E-mail survey response rates: A review. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2001;6
13. Zakosteletzki L, Nachtnebel A. Horizon scanning in oncology - Impact evaluation and environmental analysis. Wien, Austria: Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment; 2012
14. Hailey D, Babidge W, Cameron A, Lise A. HTA agencies and decision makers - An INAHTA guidance document. Alberta, Canada: INAHTA; 2010
15. Wanke M, Juzwishin D, Thornley R, Chan L. An exploratory review of evaluations of health technology assessment agencies. HTA Initiative. Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2006
16. Murphy K, Packer C, Stevens A, Simpson S. Effective early warning systems for new and emerging health technologies: Developing an evaluation framework and an assessment of current systems. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:324-330
17. Raftery J, Hanney S, Green C, Buxton M. Assessing the impact of Englands National Health Service R&D Health Technology Assessment program using the payback approach. Int J Technol Assess HealthCare. 2009;25:1-5
18. American Association for Public Opinion Research Response Rates - An Overview. http://www.aapor.org/AAPORKentico/Education-Resources/ For-Researchers/Poll-Survey-FAQ/Response-Rates-An-Overview.aspx (accessed January 18, 2015)
19. Hofmarcher M. Health systems in transition - Austria. Brussels: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policy; 2013
20. Huic M, Nachtnebel A, Zechmeister I, et al. Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): Four case studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:323-330
21. EUnetHTA. Work package 5 joint action: Relative effectiveness assessment of pharmaceuticals. HTA Core Model R- for rapid relative effectiveness assessment of pharmaceuticals. Copenhagen: EUnetHTA; 2013
22. HaileyD. Elements of effectiveness for health technology assessment programs. HTA Initiative. Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2003.