Assessing the impact of England's National Health Service R & D Health Technology Assessment program using the "payback" approach

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-5

  Raftery, James ^a   Hanney, Stephen ^d   Green, Colin ^b   Buxton, Martin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE

Author keywords

HTA; Impact; Payback

Indexed keywords

ENGLAND; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; HTA; IMPACT; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; PAYBACK; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS;

RESEARCH; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

HEALTH;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CASE STUDY; FUNDING; HEALTH SURVEY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLICATION; UNITED KINGDOM; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; STATISTICS;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; DATA COLLECTION; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STATE MEDICINE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 60749137396     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309090011     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Academy Medical Sciences/MRC/Welcome Trust. Medical research: Assessing the benefits to society. London: Academy Medical Sciences; 2006
2. American Gastroenterologist Association. American Gastroenterologist Association medical position statement: Evaluation of dyspepsia. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1753-1755. (Pubitemid 41597411)
3. Black N. Evidence based policy: Proceed with care. BMJ. 2001;323;275-279. (Pubitemid 32729118)
4. Buxton M, Hanney S. How can payback from health services research be assessed? J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996;1:35-43.
5. Department of Health. National service framework for older people. London: Department of Health; 2001. http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/07/12/83/ 04071283.pdf.
6. Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, et al. Management of adult rehabilitation care: A clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36:e100-e143.
7. Ferguson B, Kelly P, GeorgiouA, et al. Assessing payback from NHSreactive research programmes. J Manag Med. 2000;14:25-36.
8. Hanney S, Buxton M, Green C, Coulson D, Raftery J. An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Health Technol Assess. 2007 ;11:iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-180. http://www.ncchta.org/fullmono/mon1153.pdf. (Pubitemid 351247224)
9. Hanney S, Gonzalez-Block M, Buxton M, Kogan M. The utilisation of health research in policy-making: Concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Res Policy Syst. 2003; 1:2. (Pubitemid 39112029)
10. Hanney S, Grant J, Wooding S, Buxtom MJ. Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of research: The impact of funding by the UK's 'Arthritis Research Campaign'. Health Res Policy Syst. 2004;2:4.
11. Hanney S, Soper B, Buxton M. Evaluation of the NHS R&D Methods Programme. HERG Report No.29. Uxbridge: Brunel University; 2003.
12. Jacob R, Battista R. Assessing technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1993;9:564-572.
13. Jacob R, McGregor M. Assessing the impact of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:68-80. (Pubitemid 27138809)
14. Johnston SC, Rootenberg JD, Katrak S, Smith WS, Elkins JS. Effects of a US National Institutes of Health programme of clinical trials on public health and costs. Lancet. 2006;367:1319-1327.
15. Kalra L, Evans A, Perez I, et al. Alternative strategies for stroke care: A prospective randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;356:894-899. (Pubitemid 30706900)
16. Kalra L, Evans A, Perez I, et al. A randomised controlled comparison of alternative strategies for stroke care. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:iii-iv, 1-79.
17. Kingwell BA, Anderson GP, Duckett SJ, et al. Evaluation of NHMRC funded research completed in 1992, 1997 and 2003: Gains in knowledge, health and wealth. Med J Aust. 2006;184:282-286.
18. Kogan M, Henkel M, Hanney S. Government and research: Thirty years of evolution. 2nd ed. Dortrecht: Springer; 2003.
19. Kwan P, Johnston J, Fung AY, et al. A systematic evaluation of payback of publicly funded health and health services research in Hong Kong. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:121. (Pubitemid 47326495)
20. Shah S, Ward JE. Outcomes from NHMRC public health research project grants awarded in 1993. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25:556-560.
21. Stryer D, Tunis S, Hubbard H, Clancy C. The outcomes of outcomes and effectiveness research: Impacts and lessons from the first decade. Health Serv Res. 2000;35(pt 1):977-993. (Pubitemid 32003461)
22. Ward E, King M, Lloyd M, et al. Randomised controlled trial of nondirective counselling, cognative-behaviour therapy and usual general practitioner care for patients with depression. I: Clinical effectiveness. BMJ. 2000;321:1383-1388.