Patient and caregiver values, beliefs and experiences when considering home dialysis as a treatment option: A semi-structured interview study

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 133-141

  Walker, Rachael C ^a,b   Howard, Kirsten ^a,c   Morton, Rachael L ^a,d   Palmer, Suetonia C ^e   Marshall, Mark R ^f   Tong, Allison ^a,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Hawke's Bay District Health Board   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^f Baxter Healthcare Asia Pacific   (China)

^g CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT WESTMEAD   (Australia)

Author keywords

haemodialysis; home haemodialysis; patients; peritoneal dialysis; qualitative research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EMPLOYMENT; FAMILY RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HELP SEEKING BEHAVIOR; HEMODIALYSIS; HOME DIALYSIS; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROLOGY; NEW ZEALAND; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SAFETY; PEER GROUP; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENTIAL HOME; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SURVIVAL; TRUST; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; INTERVIEW; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAREGIVERS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS, HOME; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84960084728     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfv330     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Morton RL, Tong A, Howard K, et al. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ 2010; 340: C112
2. Tong A, Lesmana B, Johnson DW, et al. The perspectives of adults living with peritoneal dialysis: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 61: 873-888
3. Wyld M, Morton RL, Hayen A, et al. A systematic review and meta-Analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments. PLoS Med 2012; 9: e1001307
4. Marshall MR, Hawley CM, Kerr PG, et al. Home hemodialysis and mortality risk in Australian and New Zealand populations.AmJ Kidney Dis 2011; 58: 782-793
5. Noordzij M, Jager KJ. Survival comparisons between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 3385-3387
6. McDonald SP, Marshall MR, Johnson DWet al. Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20: 155-163
7. Nesrallah GE, Lindsay RM, Cuerden MS, et al. Intensive hemodialysis associates with improved survival compared with conventional hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 23: 696-705
8. Jun M, Jardine MJ, Gray N, et al. Outcomes of extended-hours hemodialysis performed predominantly at home. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 61: 247-253
9. Culleton BF, Walsh M, Klarenbach SW, et al. Effect of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis on left ventricular mass and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007; 298: 1291-1299
10. Agar JW, Knight RJ, Simmonds RE, et al. Nocturnal haemodialysis: an Australian cost comparison with conventional satellite haemodialysis. Nephrology (Carlton) 2005; 10: 557-570
11. Walker R, Marshall M, Morton RL, et al. The cost effectiveness of contemporary home haemodialysis modalities compared to facility haemodialysis: a systematic review of full economic evaluations. Nephrology 2014; 19: 459-470
12. Saran R, Li Y, Robinson B, et al. United States Renal Data System 2014 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66 (Suppl 1): S1-S306
13. Jain AK, Blake P, Cordy P, et al. Global trends in rates of peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 23: 533-544
14. Briggs N, Hurst K, McDonald SP. Methods and location of dialysis. In: Hurst K, McDonald SP (eds). The 35th Annual ANZDATA Report 2012. Adelaide, South Australia: ANZDATA Registry, 2013
15. USRDS Annual Data Report: International Comparisons. 2013. http://www. ajkd.org/issues/50272-6386(13)X0014-9 (22 July 2014, date last accessed
16. McLaughlin K, Manns B, Mortis G, et al.Why patients with ESRD do not select self-care dialysis as a treatment option. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 380-385
17. Liyanage T, Ninomiya T, Jha V, et al.Worldwide access to treatment for endstage kidney disease: a systematic review. Lancet 2015; 385: 1975-1982
18. Lauder LA, Ludlow MJ, Hawley CM, et al. Australian nephrology nurses views on home dialysis: a national survey. Ren Soc Aust J 2011; 7: 6-12
19. Ludlow MJ, Lauder LA, Mathew TH, et al. Australian consumer perspectives on dialysis: first national census. Nephrology 2012; 17: 703-709
20. Manns BJ, Taub K, Vanderstraeten C, et al. The impact of education on chronic kidney disease patients' plans to initiate dialysis with self-care dialysis: a randomized trial. Kidney Int 2005; 68: 1777-1783
21. National Institute of Care Excellence. Guidance on home compared with hospital haemodialysis for patients with end-stage renal failure. 2002. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11472/32449/32449.pdf (22 July 2014, date last accessed
22. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349-357
23. Marshall MR, van der Schrieck N, Lilley D, et al. Independent community house hemodialysis as a novel dialysis setting: an observational cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 61: 598-607
24. Walker RC, Hanson CS, Palmer SC, et al. Patient and caregiver perspectives on home hemodialysis: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 65: 451-463
25. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2009
26. Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008; 337: a288
27. Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Lillie E, et al. Setting research priorities for patients on or nearing dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 9: 1813-1821
28. Tong A, Crowe S, Chando S, et al. Research priorities in CKD: report of a NationalWorkshopConducted inAustralia. AmJ Kidney Dis 2015; 66: 212-222
29. Finkelstein FO, Story K, Firanek C, et al. Perceived knowledge among patients cared for by nephrologists about chronic kidney disease and endstage renal disease therapies. Kidney Int 2008; 74: 1178-1184
30. Walker R, Abel S, Meyer A. What do New Zealand pre-dialysis nurses believe to be effective care?. Nurs Prax N Z 2010; 26: 26-34
31. Wuerth DB, Finkelstein SH, Schwetz O, et al. Patients' descriptions of specific factors leading to modality selection of chronic peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 2002; 22: 184-190
32. In Australia, the government buys into home dialysis. Nephrol News Issues 2014. http://www.nephrologynews.com/wd-content/uploads/2015/06/TSAustralia-161576102.jpg (8 May 2015, date last accessed
33. Covic A, Bammens B, Lobbedez T, et al. Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: clinical advice from the European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) Advisory Board. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 1757-1759
34. Osterlund K, Mendelssohn D, Clase C, et al. Identification of facilitators and barriers to home dialysis selection by Canadian adults with ESRD. Semin Dial 2014; 27: 160-172
35. Winterbottom AE, Bekker HL, Conner M, et al. Patient stories about their dialysis experience biases others' choices regardless of doctor's advice: an experimental study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27: 325-331
36. Tong A, Palmer S, Manns B, et al. The beliefs and expectations of patients and caregivers about home haemodialysis: an interview study. BMJ Open 2013; 3; e002148
37. Amato D, Alvarez-Aguilar C, Castaneda-Limones R, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in an urban Mexican population. Kidney Int Suppl 2005; 68: S11-S17
38. Cass A, Cunningham J, Wang Z, et al. Regional variation in the incidence of end-stage renal disease in Indigenous Australians. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 24-27
39. Komenda P, Yu N, Leung S, et al. Secular trends in end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis in Manitoba, Canada: a population-based study. CMAJ Open 2015; 3: E8-E14
40. Anderson K, Cunningham J, Devitt J, et al. Looking back to my family: indigenous Australian patients' experience of hemodialysis. BMC Nephrol 2012; 13: 114
41. Legare F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013; 32: 276-284
42. Fortnum D, Smolonogov T, Walker R, et al.My kidneys, my choice, decision aid: supporting shared decisionmaking. J Ren Care 2015; 41: 81-87
43. Carruthers D, Warr K. Supporting peritoneal dialysis in remote Australia. Nephrology 2004; 9 (Suppl 4): S129-S133
44. Villarba A, Warr K. Home haemodialysis in remote Australia. Nephrology 2004; 9 (Suppl 4): S134-S137
45. Sanabria M, Devia M, Hernandez G, et al. Outcomes of a peritoneal dialysis program in remote communities within Colombia. Perit Dial Int 2015; 35: 52-61
46. Walker RC, Morton RL, Tong A, et al. Patient and caregiver preferences for home dialysis-The home first study: a protocol for qualitative interviews and discrete choice experiments. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e007405