Timing of the initiation of antenatal care: An exploratory qualitative study of women and service providers in East London

Midwifery

Volumn 36, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-7

  Hatherall, Bethan ^a   Morris, Joanne ^b   Jamal, Farah ^c   Sweeney, Lorna ^a   Wiggins, Meg ^c   Kaur, Inderjeet ^d   Renton, Adrian ^a   Harden, Angela ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UCL Institute of Education   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Access to health care; Antenatal care; Developed countries; Pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICE; MIDWIFE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERCEPTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRENATAL CARE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARDS; TIME FACTOR; TRENDS; URBAN POPULATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; LONDON; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDWIFERY; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PERCEPTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; PRENATAL CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TIME FACTORS; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 84960078033     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baker E.C., Rajasingam D. Using trust databases to identify predictors of late booking for antenatal care within the UK. Public Health 2012, 126:112-116.
2. Binder P., Borné Y., Johnsdotter S., Essén B. Shared language is essential: communication in a multiethnic obstetric care setting. Journal of Health Communication 2012, 17:1171-1186.
3. Binder P., Johnsdotter S., Essén B. Conceptualising the prevention of adverse obstetric outcomes among immigrants using the 'three delays' framework in a high-income context. Social Science & Medicine 2012, 75:2028-2036.
4. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3:77-101.
5. Cresswell J.A., Yu G., Hatherall B., et al. Predictors of the timing of initiation of antenatal care in an ethnically diverse urban cohort in the UK. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2013, 13.
6. Department of Health, 2012. Integrated performance measures monitoring - Midwifery. [19 September 2013]. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Statistics/Performancedataandstatistics/Integratedperfomancemeasuresmonitoring/DH_112544.
7. Dhange P., Breeze A.C.G., Kean L.H. Routine antenatal management at the booking clinic. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine 2013, 23:45-52.
8. Downe S., Finlayson K., Walsh D., Lavender T. 'Weighing up and balancing out': a meta-synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries. BJOG 2009, 116:518-529.
9. Finlayson K., Downe S. Why do women not use antenatal services in low- and middle-income countries? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Plos Medicine 2013, 10(1):e1001373. 10.1371/journal.pmd.1001373.
10. GLA Intelligence Unit, 2015. Births by parents' country of birth, Mayor of London, London.
11. Haddrill R., Jones G.L., Mitchell C.A., Anumba D.O.C. Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14.
12. Harper Bulman K., McCourt C. Somali refugee women's experiences of maternity care in west London: a case study. Critical Public Health 2002, 12:365-380.
13. Hollowell, J., Oakley, L., Vigurs, C., Barnett-Page, E., Kavanagh, J., Oliver, S., 2012. Increasing the early initiation of antenatal care by black and minority ethnic women in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of women's views and the literature on intervention effectiveness. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford.
14. HSCIC, 2009. Indicators for quality improvement - full indicator list. The Health and Social Care Information Centre.
15. Kupek E., Petrou S., Vause S., Maresh M. Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales. BJOG 2002, 109:265-273.
16. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2008. Antenatal care - routine care for the healthy pregnant woman.
17. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2010. Pregnancy and complex social factors: A model for service provision for pregnant women with complex social factors. NICE, London.
18. Oakley, L., Gray, R., Kurinczuk, J.J., Brocklehurst, P., Hollowell J., 2009. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to increase the early initiation of antenatal care in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women. Final report. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford.
19. Office for National Statistics, Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), 2010. Cited by ChiMat QIPP Maternity Resource Pack, Newham PCT.
20. Pope C., Ziebland S., Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Qualitative Research in Health Care 2006, 63-81. Blackwell Publishing Limited, Oxford. third edn. C. Pope, N. Mays (Eds.).
21. Redshaw, M. Heikkila, K., 2010. Delivered with care: a national survey of women's experience of maternity care. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford.
22. Rowe R.E., Garcia J. Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. Journal of Public Health Medicine 2003, 25:113-119.
23. Rowe R.E., Magee H., Quigley M.A., Heron P., Askham J., Brockehurst P. Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England. Public Health 2008, 122:1363-1372.
24. Smith, A., Shakespeare, J., Dixon, A. The role of GPs in maternity care - what does the future hold? King's Fund.