Using Trust databases to identify predictors of late booking for antenatal care within the UK

Public Health

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 112-116

  Baker, E C ^a   Rajasingam, D ^a  

^a ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Access to care; Antenatal care; Late booking; Quality standards; Vulnerable groups

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; DATABASE; ETHNIC GROUP; HEALTH CARE; LANGUAGE; PREGNANCY; WOMENS STATUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BODY MASS; CAUCASIAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; NEGRO; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PREDICTION; PRENATAL CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRUST DATA BASE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; BODY MASS INDEX; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; FORECASTING; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTERS; PRENATAL CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATE MEDICINE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

ENGLAND; LONDON [ENGLAND]; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84856561888     PISSN: 00333506     EISSN: 14765616     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer - 2003-2005. The seventh report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 2007, CEMACH, London. G. Lewis (Ed.).
2. Quick J., Greenlick M., Roghmann K. Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in an HMO and general population: a multivariate cohort analysis. Am J Public Health 1981, 71:381-390.
3. Villar J., Ba'aqeel H., Piaggio G., Lumbiganon P., Belizan J., Farnot U. WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet 2001, 357:1551-1564.
4. Department of Health Maternity matters: choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service 2007, Department of Health, London.
5. De Boo H.A., Harding J.E. The developmental origins of adult disease (Barker) hypothesis. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2006, 46:4-14.
6. National Institute of Clinical Excellence CG62 Antenatal care: NICE guideline 2008, NHS, London.
7. HES Online HES Online maternity data. Figure1: gestation period in weeks at first antenatal assessment date, 2006-07 2008, Information Centre, London.
8. Buller A.M., Murray S.F. Monitoring of access to maternity services in the UK: a basket of markers for local casenote audit 2007, King's College London, London.
9. Information Centre Indicators for quality improvement 2008, Information Centre, London, Available at:. https://mqi.ic.nhs.uk/PerformanceIndicatorChapter.aspx%3Fnumber%3D1.06.
10. Kupek K., Petrou S., Vause S., Maresh M. Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002, 109:265-273.
11. Rowe R.E., Magee H., Quigley M.A., Heron P., Askham J., Brocklehurst P. Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England. Public Health 2008, 122:1363-1372.
12. Heaman M.I., Green C.G., Newburn-Cook C.V., Elliott L.J., Helewa M.E. Social inequalities in use of prenatal care in Manitoba. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada 2007, 29:806-816.
13. Healthcare Commission Towards better births - a review of maternity services in England 2008, CQC, London.
14. Rowe R., Garcia J. Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. J Public Health Med 2003, 25:113-119.
15. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health CG 110 pregnancy and complex social factors 2010, NICE, London.
16. House of Commons Health Committee Inequalities in access to maternity services, Eighth report of session 2002-03 2003, The Stationery Office, London.
17. Hart J.T. The inverse care law. Lancet 1971, 1:405-412.
18. Watt G. The inverse care law today. Lancet 2002, 360:252-254.
19. Sebire N.J., Jolly M., Harris J.P., Wadsworth J., Joffe M., Beard R.W., et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes 2001, 25:1175-1182.
20. Chereshneva M., Hinkson L., Oteng-Ntim E. The effects of booking body mass index on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in an inner city UK tertiary referral centre. Obstet Med 2008, 1:88-91.
21. Rajasingam D., Seed P.T., Briley A.L., Shennan A.H., Poston L. A prospective study of pregnancy outcome and biomarkers of oxidative stress in nulliparous obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009, 200. 395.e1-395e.9.
22. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Management of women with obesity in pregnancy. CMACE/RCOG joint guideline 2010, RCOG, London.
23. D'Souza L., Garcia J. Improving services for disadvantaged childbearing women. Child Care Health Develop 2004, 30:599-611.
24. Trinh L.T.T., Rubin G. Late entry into antenatal care in New South Wales, Australia. Reprod Health 2006, 3:8.
25. Delvaux T., Buekens P., Godin I., Boutsen M. Barriers to prenatal care in Europe. Am J Prev Med 2001, 21:52-59.
26. Johnson A.A., El-Khorazaty N., Hatcher B.J., Wingrove B.K., Milligan R., Harris C., et al. Determinants of late prenatal care initiation by African American women in Washington, DC. Matern Child Health J 2003, 7:103-114.
27. Delgado-Rodríguez M., Gómez-Olmedo M., Bueno-Cavanillas A., Gálvez-Vargas R. Unplanned pregnancy as a major determinant in inadequate use of prenatal care. Prev Med 1997, 26:834-838.
28. Braveman P., Marchi K., Egerter S., Pearl M., Neuhaus J. Barriers to timely prenatal care among women with insurance: the importance of prepregnancy factors. Obstet Gynecol 2000, 95:874-880.
29. Pagnini D.L., Reichman N.E. Psychosocial factors and the timing of prenatal care among women in New Jersey's HealthStart Program. Fam Plann Perspect 2000, 32:56-64.
30. Information Standards Board National maternity services dataset: requirement for an operational information standard 2008, Information Centre, London.