Cortical integration of contextual information across objects

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 10, Issue , 2012, Pages 948-958

  Livne, Tomer ^a,b,c   Bar, Moshe ^a,b,d  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN ANALYSIS; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; PERCEPTION; PRECUNEUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPLENIAL CORTEX; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; BOLD SIGNAL; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; INFERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; LEFT HEMISPHERE; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; POSTERIOR CINGULATE; RETROSPLENIAL COMPLEX; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISION; YOUNG ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; THINKING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARIETAL LOBE; REACTION TIME; THINKING; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84959887737     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00944     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aguirre, G. K., Zarahn, E., & D’Esposito, M. (1998). An area within human ventral cortex sensitive to “building” stimuli: Evidence and implications. Neuron, 21, 373-383.
2. Aminoff, E., Gronau, N., & Bar, M. (2007). The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1493-1503.
3. Auger, S. D., & Maguire, E. A. (2013). Assessing the mechanism of response in the retrosplenial cortex of good and poor navigators. Cortex, 49, 2904-2913.
4. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 5, 617-629.
5. Bar, M., & Aminoff, E. (2003). Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron, 38, 347-358.
6. Bar, M., Aminoff, E., Mason, M., & Fenske, M. (2007). The units of thought. Hippocampus, 17, 420-428.
7. Bar, M., & Ullman, S. (1996). Spatial context in recognition. Perception, 25, 343-352.
8. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological, 57, 289-300.
9. Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177, 77-80.
10. Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W. (1973). Searching for objects in real-world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 22-27.
11. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
12. Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. L., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1-38.
13. Cheung, O., & Bar, M. (2013). The resilience of object predictions: Early recognition across viewpoints and exemplars. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 682-688.
14. Cox, D., Meyers, E., & Sinha, P. (2004). Contextually evoked object-specific responses in human visual cortex. Science, 303, 115-117.
15. Davenport, J. L. (2007). Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35, 393-401.
16. Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559-564.
17. De Graef, P., Christiaens, D., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317-329.
18. Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470-2473.
19. Droll, J., & Eckstein, M. (2008). Expected object position of two hundred fifty observers predicts first fixations of seventy seven separate observers during search. Journal of Vision, 8, 320a.
20. Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
21. Epstein, R. A. (2008). Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 388-396.
22. Epstein, R. A., Parker, W. E., & Feiler, A. M. (2007). Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 6141-6149.
23. Fletcher, P. C., Frith, C. D., Baker, S. C., Shallice, T., Frackowiak, R. S., & Dolan, R. J. (1995). The mind’s eye—Precuneus activation in memory-related imagery. Neuroimage, 2, 195-200.
24. Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (2003). An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 123-144.
25. Gronau, N., Neta, M., & Bar, M. (2008). Integrated contextual representation for objects’ identities and their locations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 371-388.
26. Hasson, U., Harel, M., Levy, I., & Malach, R. (2003). Large-scale mirror-symmetry organization of human occipito-temporal object areas. Neuron, 37, 1027-1041.
27. Haxby, J. V., Ungerleider, L. G., Clark, V. P., Schouten, J. L., Hoffman, E. A., & Martin, A. (1999). The effect of face inversion on activity in human neural systems for face and object perception. Neuron, 22, 189-199.
28. Joubert, O. R., Rousselet, G. A., Fize, D., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2007). Processing scene context: Fast categorization and object interference. Vision Research, 47, 3286-3297.
29. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
30. Kim, J. G., & Biederman, I. (2011). Where do objects become scenes? Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1738-1746.
31. Konkle, T., & Oliva, A. (2012). A real-world size organization of object responses in occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron, 74, 1114-1124.
32. Krause, B. J., Schmidt, D., Mottaghy, F. M., Taylor, J., Halsband, U., Herzog, H., et al. (1999). Episodic retrieval activates the precuneus irrespective of the imagery content of word pair associates—A PET study. Brain, 122, 255-263.
33. Lundstrom, B. N., Ingvar, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2005). The role of precuneus and left inferior frontal cortex during source memory episodic retrieval. Neuroimage, 27, 824-834.
34. Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A., et al. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 92, 8135-8139.
35. Mudrik, L., Lamy, D., & Deouell, L. Y. (2010). ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia, 48, 507-517.
36. O’Craven, K., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1013-1023.
37. Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory and Cognition, 3, 519-526.
38. Park, S., Chun, M., & Johnson, M. (2010). Refreshing and integrating visual scenes in scene-selective cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2813-2822.
39. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
40. Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 98, 676-682.
41. Rugg, M. D., & Vilberg, K. L. (2013). Brain networks underlying episodic memory retrieval. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23, 255-260.
42. Sestieri, C., Corbetta, M., Romani, G. L., & Shulman, G. L. (2011). Episodic memory retrieval, parietal cortex, and the default mode network: Functional and topographic analyses. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 4407-4420.
43. Shulman, G. L., Fiez, J. A., Corbetta, M. B., Miezin, F. M., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (1997). Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 648-663.
44. Troiani, V., Stigliani, A., Smith, M. E., & Epstein, R. A. (2014). Multiple object properties drive scene-selective regions. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 883-897.
45. Wolfe, J. M., Alvarez, G. A., Rosenholtz, R., Kuzmova, Y. I., & Sherman, A. M. (2011). Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1650-1671.
46. Xu, Y. (2008). Representing connected and disconnected shapes in the human inferior intraparietal sulcus. Neuroimage, 40, 1849-1856.