3D frame-type macro-element modeling for seismic analysis of masonry buildings

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 3230-3237

  Penna, Andrea ^a  

^a European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering   (Italy)

Author keywords

Equivalent frame model; Masonry; Nonlinear analysis

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FLOORS; MASONRY CONSTRUCTION; MASONRY MATERIALS; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

EQUIVALENT FRAME; MASONRY; ORTHOTROPIC MEMBRANES; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC SAFETY ASSESSMENTS; SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL; TIME HISTORY ANALYSIS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84959862272     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. M. Tomaževič (1978) The computer program POR, Report ZRMK, Ljubljana (in Slovenian)
2. F. Braga and M. Dolce (1982) A method for the analysis of antiseismic multi-storey masonry buildings, Proc. Of the 6th I.B.Ma.C., Roma, 1982, pp. 1088-1099 (in Italian)
3. M. Tomaževič (1987) Dynamic modelling of masonry buildings: Storey mechanism model as a simple alternative, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 15 (6): 731-749
4. G. Magenes and A. Della Fontana (1998) Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings, Proc. of the British Masonry Society, No. 8, October 1998, 190-195
5. A. Brencich and S. Lagomarsino (1998) A macro-elements dynamic model for masonry shear walls, Proc. STRUMAS IV - 4th Int. Symp. on Computer Methods in Structural Masonry, E&FN Spon, London, 1998, pp. 67-75
6. A. Galasco, S. Lagomarsino, A. Penna and S. Resemini (2004) NonLinear Seismic Analysis of Masonry Structures, Proc. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada
7. S.-Y. Chen, F.L. Moon and T. Yi (2008) A macroelement for the nonlinear analysis of in-plane unreinforced masonry piers, Engineering Structures, 30(8): 2242-2252
8. G. Magenes (2000) A Method for Pushover Analysis in Seismic assessment of Masonry Buildings, Proc. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, CD-ROM, Auckland, New Zealand
9. P. Roca, C. Molins and A.R. Marì (2005), Strength capacity of masonry wall structures by the equivalent frame method, Journal of Structural Engng, ASCE, Vol. 131, no. 10, 1601-1610
10. A.J. Kappos, G.G. Penelis and C.G. Drakopoulos (2002) Evaluation of simplified models for lateral load analysis of unreinforced masonry buildings, Journ. of Struct. Engineering, ASCE, 128(7): 890-897
11. Y. Belmouden and P. Lestuzzi (2009) An equivalent frame model for seismic analysis of masonry and reinforced concrete buildings, Construction and Building Materials, 23(1): 40-53.
12. G. Magenes, M. Remino, C.F. Manzini, P. Morandi and D. Bolognini (2006) SAM II, Software for the simplified seismic analysis of masonry buildings, University of Pavia and EUCENTRE
13. S. Lagomarsino, A. Penna and A. Galasco (2006), TREMURI Program: Seismic Analysis Program for 3D Masonry Buildings, University of Genoa
14. S. Lagomarsino, A. Galasco and A. Penna (2007) Non Linear MacroElement Dynamic Analysis of Masonry Buildings, Proc. ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rethymno, Crete, Greece
15. L. Gambarotta and S. Lagomarsino (1996) On the dynamic response of masonry panels, Proc. of the National Conference "Masonry Mechanics between Theory and Practice", Messina, Italy (in Italian)
16. A. Penna (2002) A macro-element procedure for the nonlinear dynamic analysis of masonry buildings, Ph.D. Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy (in Italian)
17. L. Gambarotta, S. Lagomarsino (1997) Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear walls. Part II: The continuum model and its applications, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 26, 441-463
18. A. Galasco, S. Lagomarsino and A. Penna, On the use of pushover analysis for existing masonry buildings, 1st ECEES, Ginevra 2006
19. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (2000) Action Plan for Performance-based Seismic Design. FEMA 349, Report, prepared by the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
20. J.E. Tanner, J.L. Varela, R.E. Klingner, M.T. Brightman and U. Cancino (2005) Seismic Testing of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Shearwalls: A Comprehensive Review, ACI Structural Journal, May-June 2005: 374-382
21. A.A. Costa, A. Penna, G. Magenes (2011) Seismic performance of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) masonry: from experimental testing of the in-plane capacity of walls to building response simulation, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 15(1): 1-31
22. A. Penna, M. Rota, G. Magenes and S. Frumento (2010) Seismic performance assessment of AAC masonry, Proc. 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pap. N. 1431, Ohrid, Macedonia
23. P. Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic spectra, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 28(9), 979-993
24. D. Vamvatsikos and C.A. Cornell (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3): 491-514
25. st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, Keynote Address K9, CD-ROM
26. G. Magenes (2010) Earthquake resistant design of masonry structures: rules, backgrounds, latest findings, Keynote Speech, Proc. 8th International Masonry Conference, Dresden, Germany
27. th European Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France, Balkema, Rotterdam
28. Applied Technology Council (1996) ATC40 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing concrete buildings, Redwood City (CA)
29. th International Masonry Conference, pap. N. 215, Dresden, Germany.
30. th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, Sydney, (2008), CD-ROM.
31. M. Rota, A. Penna, G. Magenes (2010) A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses, Engineering Structures, 32(5): 1312-1323.