An equivalent frame model for seismic analysis of masonry and reinforced concrete buildings

Construction and Building Materials

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 40-53

  Belmouden, Y ^a   Lestuzzi, P ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Equivalent frame; Reinforced concrete; Seismic evaluation; Structural wall; Unreinforced masonry

Indexed keywords

ABS RESINS; AXIAL FLOW; BENDING (DEFORMATION); BUILDING MATERIALS; COMPOSITE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FOUNDATIONS; LINEARIZATION; MASONRY MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MODEL BUILDINGS; MODEL STRUCTURES; PIERS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMOLOGY; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

ANALYTICAL RESULTS; AXIAL FORCES; CONSTITUTIVE LAWS; EQUIVALENT FRAME; FAILURE CRITERION; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; FINITE ELEMENT PACKAGES; FRAME MODELS; INTERACTION RULES; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS; PUSHOVER METHODS; REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS; SEISMIC ANALYSIS; SEISMIC EVALUATION; SHEAR FORCES; SHIFTING; SIMPLIFIED MODELS; SMEARED CRACKS; STRUCTURAL MODELS; STRUCTURAL WALL; STRUCTURAL WALLS; UNREINFORCED MASONRIES; UNREINFORCED MASONRY; ZERO MOMENTS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 54049085824     PISSN: 09500618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.023     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Tzamtzis A.D., and Asteris P.G. FE analysis of complex discontinuous and jointed structural systems: part 1: presentation of the method - A state-of-the-art review. Electron J Struct Eng (2004) 1
2. Belmouden Y, Lestuzzi P. Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing buildings in Switzerland. Applied Computing and Mechanics Laboratory. Structural Engineering Institute. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. Research Report No 6, April 2006.
3. Roca P., Molins C., and Marí A.R. Strength capacity of masonry wall structures by the equivalent frame method. J Struct Eng 131 10 (2005) 1601-1610
4. Salonikios T., Karakostas C., Lekidis V., and Anthoine A. Comparative inelastic pushover analysis of masonry frames. Eng Struct J 25 (2005) 1515-1523
5. Kappos A., Penelis G., and Drakopoulos C. Evaluation of simplified models for lateral load analysis of unreinforced masonry buildings. J Struc Eng, ASCE 128 7 (2002) 890-897
6. ATC-40. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, vol. 1. Redwood City, California: Applied Technology Council; 1996.
7. Belmouden Y., and Lestuzzi P. Analytical model for predicting nonlinear reversed cyclic behaviour of reinforced concrete structural walls. Eng Struc 29 7 (2007) 1263-1276
8. ElMandooh K., and Ghobarah A. Flexural and shear hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete columns with variable axial load. Eng Struc 25 (2003) 1353-1367
9. Nuray Aydinoǧlu M. An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure based on inelastic spectral displacements for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation. Bull Earthquake Eng 1 (2003) 3-36
10. Kilar V., and Fajfar P. Simple pushover analysis of asymmetric buildings. Earthquake Eng Struc Dyn 26 (1997) 233-249
11. Lang K. Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. PhD thesis. Institute of Structural Engineering, Zürich, Switzerland, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, February 2002.
12. FEMA 356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000.
13. FEMA 306. Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings, basic procedures manual. Washington (DC): The Partnership for response and recovery; 1999.
14. Paquette J., and Bruneau M. Pseudo-dynamic testing of unreinforced masonry building with flexible diaphragm and comparison with existing procedures. Construct Build Mater 20 (2006) 220-228
15. Penelis G.R.G. An efficient approach for pushover analysis of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures. J Earthquake Eng 10 3 (2006) 359-379
16. Prakash V, Powell GH, Campbell S. DRAIN3DX: Base program description and user guide, UCB/SEMM-1994/07. Berkeley: Department of Civil Engineering, University of California; August 1994.
17. ETABS. Integrated building design software, computers and structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA, Version 9, November 2005.
18. Bachmann H, Dazio A. A deformation-based seismic design procedure for structural wall buildings. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, Bled/Slovenia, A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam; 24-27 June 1997.
19. Dazio A. Entwurf und Bemessung von Tragwandgebäuden unter Erdbebeneinwirkung. Institut für Baustatik und Konstruktion, ETH Zürich, Bericht Nr. 254. Birkhäuser Verlag: Basel; 2000 [in German].
20. Wilkinson S.M., and Hiley R.A. A non-linear response history model for the seismic analysis of high-rise framed buildings. Comput Struct 84 (2006) 318-329
21. Magenes G. A method for pushover analysis in seismic assessment of masonry buildings. Paper 186612WCEE; 2000.
22. Magenes G, Della Fontana A. Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of the fifth international masonry conference, London; 13-15th, 1998.
23. Magenes G., and Calvi G.M. In-plane response of brick masonry walls. Earthquake Eng Struc Dyn 26 (1997) 1091-1112
24. Tomazevic M. Seismic resistance verification of buildings: following the new trends, seismic methodologies for the next generation of codes. In: Fajfar P, Krawinkler H, editors. Balkema: Rotterdam; 1997.
25. Dolce M. Schematizzazione e modellazione per azioni nel piano delle pareti (Models for in-plane loading of masonry walls). Corso sul consolidamento degli edifici in muratura in zona sismica, Ordine degli Ingegneri, Potenza; 1989.