Flow Diverter Therapy with the Pipeline Embolization Device Is Associated with an Elevated Rate of Delayed Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Lesions

Stroke

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 789-797

  Safain, Mina G ^a   Roguski, Marie ^a   Heller, Robert S ^a   Malek, Adel M ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; embolization, therapeutic; ischemia; magnetic resonance imaging; stents; stroke

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL; HEPARIN;

ADULT; AGED; ANTICOAGULATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; BLOOD CLOTTING TIME; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN DAMAGE; COIL EMBOLIZATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DIZZINESS; FEMALE; FLOW DIVERTER THERAPY; FLUID ATTENUATED INVERSION RECOVERY; FLUID ATTENUATED INVERSION RECOVERY LESION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; INTRACRANIAL STENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARESTHESIA; PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME; PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF EXPANDING STENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING; STENT COMPLICATION; THROMBOCYTE AGGREGATION; THROMBOCYTE FUNCTION; X RAY SYSTEM; ADOLESCENT; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLIZATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; COHORT STUDIES; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84959489069     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010522     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Pierot L, Wakhloo AK. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status. Stroke. 2013;44:2046-2054. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000733.
2. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, McDougall CG, Szikora I, Lanzino G, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267:858-868. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13120099.
3. Moon K, Albuquerque FC, Ducruet AF, Webster Crowley R, McDougall CG. Treatment of ophthalmic segment carotid aneurysms using the pipeline embolization device: clinical and angiographic follow-up. Neurol Res. 2014;36:344-350. doi: 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000322.
4. Eller JL, Dumont TM, Sorkin GC, Mokin M, Levy EI, Snyder KV, et al. The Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014;11:137-150. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2014.877188.
5. Monteith SJ, Tsimpas A, Dumont AS, Tjoumakaris S, Gonzalez LF, Rosenwasser RH, et al. Endovascular treatment of fusiform cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:945-954. doi: 10.3171/2013.12.JNS13945.
6. Murthy SB, Shah S, Venkatasubba Rao CP, Bershad EM, Suarez JI. Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j. jocn.2013.03.014.
7. Heller RS, Dandamudi V, Lanfranchi M, Malek AM. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on thromboembolism after flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurosurg. 2013;119:1603-1610. doi: 10.3171/2013.7.JNS122178.
8. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44:442-447. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151.
9. Fischer S, Vajda Z, Aguilar Perez M, Schmid E, Hopf N, Bäzner H, et al. Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology. 2012;54:369-382. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x.
10. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:632-42, discussion 642. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU. 0000339109.98070.65.
11. McAuliffe W, Wycoco V, Rice H, Phatouros C, Singh TJ, Wenderoth J. Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:164-170. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2727.
12. Chiu AH, Nadarajah M, Wenderoth JD. Cost analysis of intracranial aneurysmal repair by endovascular coiling versus flow diversion: at what size should we use which method? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013;57:423-426. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12040.
13. el-Chalouhi N, Jabbour PM, Tjoumakaris SI, Starke RM, Dumont AS, Liu H, et al. Treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: cost comparison of flow diversion and traditional embolization strategies. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.089.
14. Colby GP, Lin LM, Paul AR, Huang J, Tamargo RJ, Coon AL. Cost comparison of endovascular treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device and stent-assisted coiling. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:944-948, discussion 948. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182690b8b.
15. Tan LA, Keigher KM, Munich SA, Moftakhar R, Lopes DK. Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline Embolization Device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7:217-221. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011111.
16. Fiorella D, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Kelly ME, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG, et al. Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2009;1:56-65. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2009.000083.
17. Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, Kadirvel R, Lewis DA, Cloft HJ. A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1153-1158. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1530.
18. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, Nelson PK. Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1115-1120, discussion 1120. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325873.44881.6e.
19. Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, Kadirvel R, Lewis DA, Cloft HJ. A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke. 2007;38:2346-2352. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576.
20. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Chapter 13: Marginal models: Generalized estimating equations (GEE) In: Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH, eds. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2012:353-394.
21. Heller RS, Dandamudi V, Calnan D, Malek AM. Neuroform intracranial stenting for aneurysms using simple and multi-stent technique is associated with low risk of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging lesions. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:582-590, discussion 590. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000053.
22. Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris SI, Rosenwasser RH, Gonzalez LF, Jabbour P. Flow-diversion panacea or poison? Front Neurol. 2014;5:21. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00021.
23. Castillo M, Mukherji SK. Clinical applications of FLAIR, HASTE, and magnetization transfer in neuroimaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2000;21:417-427.
24. Kates R, Atkinson D, Brant-Zawadzki M. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR): clinical prospectus of current and future applications. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;8:389-396.
25. Leung GK, Tsang AC, Lui WM. Pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review. Clin Neuroradiol. 2012;22:295-303. doi: 10.1007/s00062-012-0178-6.
26. Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, Marosfoi M, Vajda ZS, Lee W, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1139-1147. doi: 10.3174/ajnr. A2023.
27. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:34-40. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2421.
28. Huang KL, Ho MY, Chang CH, Ryu SJ, Wong HF, Hsieh IC, et al. Impact of silent ischemic lesions on cognition following carotid artery stenting. Eur Neurol. 2011;66:351-358. doi: 10.1159/000332614.
29. Capoccia L, Sbarigia E, Rizzo A, Mansour W, Speziale F. Silent stroke and cognitive decline in asymptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization. Vascular. 2012;20:181-187. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.oa0342.
30. Maggio P, Altamura C, Landi D, Migliore S, Lupoi D, Moffa F, et al. Diffusion-weighted lesions after carotid artery stenting are associated with cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci. 2013;328:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.02.019.
31. Altinbas A, van Zandvoort MJ, van den Berg E, Algra A, de Borst GJ, Hendrikse J, et al. The effect of white matter lesions on cognition after carotid revascularization. J Neurol Sci. 2013;334:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j. jns.2013.07.2512.